Advanced Search Results

D.P. Hirematt and ors. Vs. State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Mysore Munsiffs (Recruitment) Rules, 1958 - Rule 3 and 3(2); Mysore Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 16(1)

Reported in : AIR1971Kant229; AIR1971Mys229

Advocate for Respondent : Byra Reddy, Govt. Adv., ;H.B. Datar, ;Murlidhar Rao, ;S.D. Chatre, ;Tukaram S. Pai and ;K.N. Haridasan Nambiar, Advs.

K. Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This Writ Petition raises the question of seniority between the petitioners and respondents 8 to 12. The petitioners are direct recruits whereas respondents 3 to 12 are promotees to the cadre of...

Y. Shantha Vs. the Selection Committee for Post Graduate Degree and Di ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Medical College (Selection for Post Graduate Courses) Rules, 1977 - Rules 3, 6, 6(2), 8(1), 9 and 9(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 228A

Reported in : AIR1978Kant66

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Byra Reddy, Adv. General

ORDER1. Dr. Y. Shanta, petitioner before me having completed M.B.B.S. and Senior Horsemanship was an applicant for selection to a Post Graduate Degree in Paediatrics, Micro Biology and five other subjects, the selection of which is...

T. Krishnappa and anr. Vs. H. Lingappa

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 196l - Sections 21 (1) and 50; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 114 and 151

Reported in : AIR1982Kant58; ILR1981KAR1276; 1981(2)KarLJ225

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Byra Reddy, Adv.

ORDER1. The tenant-petitioner has filed I. A. V and wants the Court to consider the subsequent events and consider if the respondent has failed to establish his reasonable and bona fide need treating the application as...

Basappa and ors. Vs. the Textile Commissioner, Bombay 1 and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 141, 226 and 245; Cotton Textiles (Control) Order, 1948; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3 and 8

Reported in : AIR1980Kant130

Advocate for Respondent : U.L. Narayanarao, Sr. Central Govt. Standing Counsel and ;R.N. Byra Reddy, Adv. General

ORDER1. As common questions of law arise for determination in these cases. I propose to dispose of them by a common order. 2. Among others, the petitioners, who own lea than five powerlooms claim to be...

Mckenzies Ltd. Vs. State of Mysore (Karnataka) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 and 115(1); Constitution of India - Article 133(1); Evidence Act

Reported in : AIR1978Kant89; 1978(1)KarLJ57

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Byra Reddy, Adv.

Malimath, J. 1. M/s. Mckenzies Ltd., Engineers and Contractors, Bombay, have challenged in this revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the order of the Second Additional Civil Judge, Bangalore City,...

Workmen of Davangere Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Bangal ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F, 33(2) and 33A

Reported in : [1974(28)FLR162]; ILR1973KAR11; (1973)ILLJ306Kant; (1973)1MysLJ262

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sundaraswamy

A. Narayana Pai, C.J.1. This writ petition by the workmen of the Davangere Cotton Mills Limited, represented by the Davangere Cotton Mills Employees' Association is directed against an award dated 12th July, 1967, made by the...

Muniyamma and ors. Vs. Arathi Cine Enterprises P. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155

Reported in : [1992]74CompCas256(Kar); ILR1991KAR527

Advocate for Respondent : A.G. Holla and K.B. Adhyapak, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;Md. Saifulla and ;A.N. Jayaram, Advs. for respondent Nos. 4 and 6

K. Shivashankar Bhat, J. 1. The petitioners seek rectification of the register of members of the first respondent company (referred to as 'the company'), with a declaration that the 21 persons named in the petition are...

Auduth Modu Timblo and Another Vs. Dilip Modu Timblo and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. All these Company Appeals involve common and connected questions of law and fact. As such, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. 2. These four appeals represent two sets of cross appeals, one...

Nanjundappa (R.N.) and ors. Vs. Thimmayya (T.) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Mysore Education Department Services (Technical Education Department) (Special Recruitment) Rules, 1967; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309; Mysore Education Department Services (Technical Education Department) (Special Recruitment) Rules, 1957; Mysore State Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1957 - Rule 16; Mysore Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1957 - Rule 1A; Mysore Absorption of Instructors and Assistant Instructors in Tailoring Rules, 1965; Mysore State Civil Service (General Recruitment) (Amendment) Rules, 1958; Cadre and Recruitment Rules, 1964

Reported in : (1970)ILLJ160Kant

ORDERGopivallabha Ayyangar, J.1. The petitioners in these writ petitions challenge the validity of the rules called 'the Mysore Education Department Services (Technical Education Department) (Special Recruitment) Rules, 1967,' made by the Governor of Mysore in exercise...

R.N. Nanjundappa and ors. Vs. T. Thimmiah and ors. Overruled

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Mysore Education Department Services (Technical Education Department) (Special Recruitment) Rules, 1967; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309; Mysore State Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1957 - Rule 16; Mysore Government Servant Seniority Rules, 1957 - Rule 1-A; Mysore Absorption of Instructors and Assistant Instructors in Tailoring Rules, 1965 - Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1969Kant208; AIR1969Mys208; (1969)1MysLJ22

Gopivallabha Iyengar, J.1. The Petitioners in these Writ Petitions challenge the validity of the Rules called 'The Mysore Education Department Services (Technical Education Department) (Special Recruitment) rules 1967') made by the governor of Mysore in exercise...