Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: borade · Page 1 of about 360 results (0.139 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 27 1992

Deepak Mahajan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-27-1992

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT593; 1992(23)DRJ160

Dalveer Bhandari, J.(1) The petitioner has preferred a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and has prayed, inter alia, that the writ of habeas corpus be issued quashing an order of detention...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 1992

Ajay Kumar JaIn Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-27-1992

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1992(22)DRJ629

Dalveer Bhandari, J.(1) The petitioner has preferred a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and has prayed, inter alia, that the writ of habeas corpus be issued quashing an order of detention...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2006

Chandrashekhar S/O Rangrao Deshmukh Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-29-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304B, 306 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 437(1), 437(2), 437(5), 439(1) and 439(2)

Reported in : 2006(5)MhLj711

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Borade, APP for respondent No. 1 and ;Shrikishan Shinde, Adv. for respondent Nos. 2 to 4

S.P. Kukday, J.1. This is an application for cancellation of bail.2. Relevant facts stated in nutshell are that sister of applicant married respondent No. 2 on 20-1-2002. She was nicely treated for two-and-half year. Subsequently there...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 01 2008

S. Manik Reddy Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-01-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2)

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3498

Advocate for Respondent : Borade, APP

ORDERB.R. Gavai, J.1. This is an application for suspension of conviction.2. The appellant accused has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to suffer R.I....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2007

Babasaheb Thombre Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-27-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 84 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2935

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Borade, APP

S.P. Kukday, J.1. The appellant is found guilty of committing murder of his wife Sanjivani on 20th April 2004, by Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon. He is convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 302 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2007

Bhaskar S/O Bhaurao Solankhe Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 32(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304B, 307 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3139

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Borade, A.P.P.

S.P. Kukday, J.1. Appellant, his mother Gangubai (accused no. 2), brother Balasaheb (accused No. 3) and sister-in-law Vandana (accused No. 4) were tried for the offences punishable under Section 302, 304-B, 498-A read with Section 34...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2000

Nana S/O Narayan Shinde and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-05-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 2(1), 3, 3(1) and 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 193 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 323, 504 and 506

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4778

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Borade, APP (for No. 1) and ;S.D. More, Adv. (for No. 2)

ORDERB.B. Vagyani, J.1. Heard Shri S. B. Talekar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri N. H. Borade, learned A.P.P. for respondent No. 1 and Shri S.D. More, learned counsel for respondent No. 2.2. The petitioner Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2004

Nivrutti S/O Shankar Shewale Since Deceased Through Lrs. Chandrakant S ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-02-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act, 1976 - Sections 2(10) and 11; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR668; 2004(4)MhLj147

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Borade, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 5

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard Shri S.K. Shinde, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri N.H. Borade, learned A.G.P. for the respondents.2. This petition takes an exception to the Government Notification dated January 25, 1988 issued by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2003

Gopichand Ana Baviskar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-22-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 299, 302, 304(2) and 323

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR239

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Borade, A.P.P.

P.B. Gaikwad, J.1. Appellants-original accused Nos. 1 to 3, being dissatisfied with the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner dated 10-1-1996 in Sessions Case No. 13/91, convicting the accused for the offence punishable under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2004

Ramanlal Hemlal Bhatiya and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-06-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 - Sections 7, 8, 8A, 8B and 10; Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 7; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 - Sections 9D; Maharashtra Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1966 - Rule 132

Reported in : 2005(2)MhLj1121

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Borade, A.G.P. for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 and ;A.H. Kasliwal, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

D.S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. Nitin R. Bhavar, Advocate holding for Mr. R. N. Dhorde, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. N. H. Borade, learned A.G.P. for the respondents No. 1 to 3 and 5 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial