Advanced Search Results

S. Harjang Singh Vs. Gowardhan Das and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(3) and 49

Reported in : AIR1952P& H183

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Mahajan and; D.N. Awasthi, Advs.

Weston, C.J. 1. This is a Letters Patent Appeal from a Judgment of Mr. Justice Falshaw given on the 20th of May 1948 in Execution Second Appeal No. 2348 of 1945. 2. The facts of the...

indira Bai Vs. Nand Kishore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Rajashthan Pre-emption Act, 1966 - Sections 9; Muslim Law; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1991SC1055; JT1990(4)SC163; 1990(2)SCALE445; (1990)4SCC668; [1990]Supp1SCR349

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Ghose, ; M. Qamaruddin and ; M. Qamaruddin, Advs.

ORDERR.M. Sahai, J.1. Is Estoppel a good defence to 'archaic', Atam Prakash v. State of Haryana : [1986]1SCR399 , right of Pre-emption which is a 'weak right', Bishen Singh v. Khazan Singh : [1959]1SCR878 , and...

Praveen Sahani and anr. (Ku.) Vs. Smt. Sushila Devi

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Pre-emption Act, 1966 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR2004Raj206; RLW2004(3)Raj1400; 2004(2)WLC780

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Gupta and; D.K. Jain, Advs.

A.C. Goyal, J.1. The defendants-appellants seek to quash the judgment and decree dated 3.7.1999 whereby the learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Jaipur City, Jaipur decreed the suit of pre-emption in respect of the suit property....

Prahlad Kumar Vs. Kishan Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR2009Raj73; RLW2009(3)Raj2441

ORDERNarendra Kumar Jain, J.1. Defendant No. 2-appellant Prahlad Kumar has preferred this Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 9th July, 1992 passed by...

Harnam Singh Vs. Dharam Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : AIR1949P& H156

Achhru Ram, J.1. This is a. second appeal from the decree of the learned District Judge of Hoshiarpur affirming on appeal the decision of a Subordinate Judge dismissing the plaintiff's suit for possession of one-third share...

Raja Dhruv Dev Chand Vs. Harmohinder Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 56 and 56(2); ;Transfer Of Property Act - Sections 4 and 108

Reported in : AIR1968SC1024; (1968)70PLR1126; [1968]3SCR339

Shah, J.1. The appellant obtained from the Court of Wards, Dada Siba Estate, a lease of five squares of land in Tahsil Okara, District Montgomery in the undivided Punjab for the Kharif season 1947 and Rabi...

Bhup Kuar and anr. Vs. Balbir Sahai and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1922All342; 64Ind.Cas.885

Lindsay, J.1. This is an appeal against-a decree of the Subordinate Judge of Aligarh in a suit brought, by the plaintiffs-appellants to enforce a mortgage executed on the 12th of October 1904, in favour of one...

Union of India & Anr. versus Tarsem Singh & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.376

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Sadhna

[2025] 2 S.C.R. 376 : 2025 INSC 146 Union of India & Anr. v. Tarsem Singh & Ors. (Miscellaneous Application No. 1773 of 2021 In Civil Appeal No. 7064 of 2019) 04 February 2025 [Surya Kant*...

In Re: Bijay Singh Dudhuria

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : AIR1930Cal641,129Ind.Cas.782

Rankin, C.J.1. The question in this case arises out of the assessment to income-tax made upon Raja Bijay Singh Dudhuria of Azimganj in the year 1924-25 and the year of account is 1923-24.2. The assessee submitted...

The State Vs. Kali

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 162; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1941; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25 and 27; ;Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9 and 10

Reported in : AIR1951HP28

Advocate for Respondent : Bishen Singh, Adv.

Chowdhry, J. 1. This is a Government appeal against the acquittal of the respondent Kali of a charge under Section 9 (c), Opium Act, by a learned Magistrate of Nahan.2. One maund and twenty-nine seers of...