Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: birju prasad · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.040 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 05 2004

Dablu @ Manish Kumar Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-05-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 - Sections 53

Advocate for Respondent : Birju Prasad, Adv. and Shyameshwar Dayal, Addl. P.P.

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J.1. This revision application has been preferred under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order dated 30th September, 2003 passed by the 2nd Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2017

Anil Pandey Alias Anil Kumar Pandey Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-25-2017

Subject : Criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2686 of 2016 Anil Pandey @ Anil Kumar Pandey ….. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party WITH A.B.A. No. 2688 of 2016 Dhananjay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2006

Ram Kishore Singh and Braj Kishore Prasad Sandilya Vs. the State of Bi ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-18-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act - Sections 29 and 30; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 403, 405, 406, 408, 409 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Advocate for Respondent : Sunil Kumar Mandal, Addl. Public Prossecutor for O.P. No. 2 and Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv.

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J.1. In both the applications, common questions of law with little variation on facts arise and as such, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Prayer of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 04 2011

Commssioner of Customs. Vs Amar Kishore Prasad

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-04-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

1.These two Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') have been preferred by the Commissioner of Customs, Patna against the common judgment and order dated 16th February 2006...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2011

Commssioner of Customs Vs Amar Kishore Prasad

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-04-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

1.These two Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') have been preferred by the Commissioner of Customs, Patna against the common judgment and order dated 16th February 2006...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 1996

Dasarath Prasad Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Dec-03-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 9(1) and 74

Advocate for Respondent : Birju Prasad, Jr. Counsel to Standing Counsel No. 6

N. Pandey, J. 1. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is for an appropriate writ, quashing the Gazette notification, contained in Bihar Gazette Extraordinary dated 11-10-1982 (Annexure-2), whereby, the State Government in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2016

Soma Munda and Ors Vs. Water Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-26-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6388 of 2014 1. Soma Munda son of late Mangra Munda, resident of Sardula Bantoli, P.O. Sangar P.S. Karra, District Khunti 2. Harakh Nath Sahu son...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2006

Deba Prasad Chakraborty and Smt. Bimla Devi and ors. Vs. State of Jhar ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-29-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR216(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Manjul Prasad, S.C. (L and C)

ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. In both the writ petitions, as almost similar orders are under challenge, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Petitioner Deo Prasad Chakraborty [W.P. (C) No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial