Advanced Search Results

Harekrishna Sarkar and Others Vs. State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 5A, 6(1) and 44(2);; West Bengal Estates Acquisition Rules - Rule 25;; West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1955 - Section 49(2)

Reported in : AIR1991Cal164

Advocate for Respondent : Bijon Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. This writ petition was moved on July 1, 1988, challenging the final order dated June 13, 1988, passed in a proceeding under Section 44(2a) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953, which was initiated...

Pfizer Limited & Anr vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t December, 2016. W.P.(C) No.2212/2016 PFIZER LIMITED & ANR Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR AND ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS 453...

Union of India and ors. Vs. Manager, M/S. JaIn and Associates

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilArbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 41 and 141 - Orders 8, IX and 20, Rules 1, 4(2), 5, 6, 9 and 13; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30, 33 and 43; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5, 15, 16, 17, 33, 35 and 39(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2001SC809; JT2001(2)SC286; 2001(1)SCALE635; (2001)3SCC277; [2001]1SCR889; 2001(2)LC1040(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok N. Desai, ; Mr. D.A. Dave, Sr. Advs., ; Mr. Syed

Shah, J.1. Leave granted.2. Question involved in this appeal is -whether provisions of Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short referred to as 'the CPC') or the principles thereof are applicable...

Ranjit Kumar Roy Vs. Smt. Sandhya Mandal @ Sandhya Rani Mandal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

GA No.807 of 2012 PLA No.211 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE In the goods of: Dr. Sr.Pulin Behari Mondal (Deceased) And Ranjit Kumar Roy Versus Smt. Sandhya...

Bijon Kumar Mallick and Ors. Vs. Associated Builders Corporation and A ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

In the High Court At Calcutta Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side GA1020of 2013 With CS464of 1981 Bijon Kumar Mallick & ORS.-vs.Associated Builders Corporation & Anr. Before : The Hon’ble Justice Mr.Arijit Banerjee For the petitioner...

P. Venugopal Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Act, 2007 - Sections 11 and 11(1A); All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 5, 6, 6(2), 10, 26 and 29; Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Amendment Act of 1987; Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (Amendment) Act, 2007; Central Provinces and Berar Sales of Motor Spirit and Lubricants Taxation Act, 1938; PGI Chandigarh Act, 1956; Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Amendment Act of 2007; Life Insurance Corporation (Modification and Settlement) Act, 1976; University Act - Sections 12(2) and 13A; Service Rules; Recruitment Rules; All India Institute of Medical Sciences Regulations, 1958 - Regulations 29, 30(2), 30(3), 30A, 31 and 35; All India Institute of Medical Sci

Reported in : (2008)4MLJ696(SC); 2008(7)SCALE255; (2008)5SCC1; 2008(3)SLJ189(SC); 2008(3)Supreme651; MANU/SC/2315/2008

Tarun Chatterjee, J.1. In this writ application under Article 32 of the Constitution moved at the instance of Dr.P.Venugopal, a renowned and internationally famed Cardio Vascular Surgeon, calls in question the constitutional validity of the proviso...

Jatindra Nath Ray Vs. Nagendra Nath Ray and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family Property

Reported in : AIR1928Cal289

B.B. Ghose, J.1. This appeal is by the plaintiff for recovery of possession of certain properties on the allegation that the is the preferential heir of the last male owner and is, therefore, entitled to succeed...

Bimalendu Ghose Vs. Smt. Mukti Ghosh

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 25, 26 and 28; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 2(2) - Order 20, Rule 6A - Order 47; ;Supreme Court Rules - Order 40

Reported in : (2008)2CALLT63(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, Adv.

Prabuddha Sankar Banerjee, J.1. This review application is at the instance of the petitioner who was also the petitioner in connection with CO. No. 1478 of 2001. By filing the instant review application, the petitioner prayed...

Nuddea Tea Co. Ltd. Vs. Asok Kumar Saha and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 108 and 155; ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 12

Reported in : [1988]64CompCas775(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Mukherjee, Adv.

Prabir Kumar Majumdar, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated December 16, 1983, passed by a learned single judge of this court on an application made by the respondent, Asok Kumar Saha,...

Jogesh Chandra Roy Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Bengal Excise Act, 1909 - Sections 8(3) and 20; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Bengal Excise Rules - Rule 58; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 107 and 115

Reported in : AIR1968Cal528

Advocate for Respondent : Tapash Chandra Ray, Adv. for Respondent No. 6 and ;N.C. Chakraborty, Govt. Pleader

D. Basu, J. 1. These two rules arise out of the same matter and involve the common facts even though the petitioners in the two cases are different persons. The controversy arises out of the settlement...