Advanced Search Results

Molay Kumar Acharya Vs. Chairman-cum-managing Director, W.B. State Ele ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(39) and 43; ;Poor Relief (Ireland) Act, 1838 - Sections 71 and 124; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 144(2)

Reported in : AIR2008Cal47,2008(3)CHN27

Advocate for Respondent : Bidyut Banerjee, ;Shila Sarkar, ;Arnab Roy and ;Sujit Sarkar Koley, Advs.

ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has prayed for an Order commanding upon the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to give a new Electricity connection in his name in the premises situated...

M/S. Oriental Ceramic Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Calcutta Municipal Corpor ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 115 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 8, Rules 6A(1) to 6G Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34;; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3(1) and (2), 4 to 24 - Schedule - Article 113

Reported in : (1999)3CALLT388(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bidyut Banerjee, ;Mr. Dipankar Chakraborty and ;Ms. Sima Chakraborty, Advs.

D.B. Dutta, J. 1. This is an application under section 115 of the CPC directed against the order dated July, 15, 1998 passed by the learned Assistant District Judge, first court. Barasat in Title Suit No....

Nanda Dulal Dey Vs. Maya Dey and Judhistir De

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bengal Money Lenders Act - Sections 8 and 13(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 41 and 47 - Order 9, Rule 13; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2005)3CALLT248(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Bidyut Banerjee, ;Shila Sarkar and ;Arnab Roy, Advs.

Narayan Chandra Sil, J.1. Both these civil revisions are taken up together for analogous consideration as both the civil revisions are directed against the same order being No. 56 dated 23.04.2004 passed by Sri N.K. Biswas,...

Satyajit Maity and anr. Vs. R.S.S. Bricks Works (Brand Deep) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69, 69(1), 69(2), 69(3) and 69(4); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2008)3CALLT504(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Bidyut Banerjee,; Kajal Roy and; S.G. Mukherjee, Advs.

Sailendra Prasad Talukdar, J.1. Order No. 15 dated 11.5.2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) at Amta, Howrah in Title Suit No. 118/05 is under challenge in this application under Article 227 of the...

Smt. Charubala Dev Nath Vs. Shri Niranjan Pathak,

Court : Kolkata

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1993Cal288,(1993)2CALLT449(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bidyut Banerjee and ;Mrs. Shila Sarkar, Advs.

ORDER1. The landlord defendant by this revision challenged order No. 42 dated 11-3-92 passed by Munsif, 1st Court, Baraset in Title Suit No. 241 of 89 directing the police to implement the order of e said...

M/S. Arun Kumar Samanta and Others Vs. M/S. Shree Ram Trading and Supp ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Act, 1890 - Section 23;; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1994Cal156,98CWN934

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sen

ORDERBhagabati Prasad Banerjee, J. 1. This is an appeal against the order dt. 4th June, 1991 passed in matter No. 1595 of 1991 passed by the learned trial Judge by which the learned trial Judge passed...

Kashinath Mondal and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 8, 17, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18A(2), 19, 19(1), 19(3), 19B(1), 21(3), 51A(5) and 51B; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24 and 29(2) - Schedule - Article 97; ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872; ;West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1960; ;Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 5; ;West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1970; ;West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1972; ;Mysore Tenancy Act - Section 37; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Original Side Rules - Rule 15

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN7

Advocate for Respondent : Saktinath Mukherfee, ;Subrata Talukdar, ;Mahendra Maskara and ;Tanmoy Roy, Advs.

1. The judgement and order dated 1st April, 2002 is assailed by this appeal. Upon reading of the impugned judgement and order we find that the only point raised before the learned Tribunal by the applicant...

indus Towers Limited and ors Vs. the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side/ Appellate Side Present: The Hon’ble Justice Soumitra Pal. W.P.No.11 of 2013 G.A.No.3503 of 2013 Indus Towers Limited & Ors Versus The Kolkata Municipal Corporation and...

Swapan Kumar Ganguly Vs. Smiritikana Ganguly

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10, 13 and 13(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : (2001)3CALLT148(HC),2001(3)CHN124,I(2002)DMC433

Advocate for Respondent : Pranab Gangopadhyay, Adv.

A.K. Banerjee, J. 1. The matrimonial suit was filed by the appellant against the respondent under Section 10 read with Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 principally on the ground of desertion. 2. The...

Basana Dutta and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : West Bengal Promotion of Construction and Transfer by Promoters Act, 1993; ;West Bengal Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 3 and 10; ; West Bengal Municipality Act, 1962 - Section 207(2); ;Bengal Municipal Act, 1932; ;West Bengal Municipal Building Rules, 1996 - Rules 13 and 50

Reported in : (2005)3CALLT67(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Bidyut Kumar Banerjee and ;Shila Sarkar, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 7 and 8, ;B.R. Bhattacharya, ;Nabanita Roy and ;Fazul Haque, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6 and ;Pinaki Banerjee, Adv.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 3rd December 1999 passed by the Chairman South Dum Dum Municipality being the respondent No. 2 herein purported to be...