Advanced Search Results
In Re: Kalipada Sadhukhan
Kolkata
Jan-18-1982
Property
Partition Act, 1893 - Section 4
AIR1982Cal376,86CWN346
Bhupendra Kumar Panda, Adv.
ORDERSudhindra Mohan Guha, J.1. This application is directed against the order dated 5th December, 1981 passed by Sri D. Pal, Subordinate Judge, 1st Court, Howrah in T. S. No. 17 of 1946 rejecting the petitioner's application...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirmal Kumar Bag and ors. Vs. Santi Kumar Chakraborty and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-13-1981
ContractProperty
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115 - Order 39, Rule 1; ;Specific Relief Act - Section 6
AIR1981Cal320,85CWN453
B.K. Panda and ;M.K. Roy, Advs.
Sudhindra Mohan Guha, J.1. This application for revision is directed against the order passed by Shri A. K. Dutta (II), Subordinate Judge, Midnapore, allowing the plaintiff-opposite party's prayer for mandatory injunction and directing the petitioners to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsoke Naidu Vs. Raymond S. Mulu
Kolkata
Mar-01-1976
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Section 372; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 101; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 2 and 26; ;Hindu Law; ;Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act
AIR1976Cal272
Nagendra Mohan Saha, Adv.
N.C. Mukherji, J. 1. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 28th February 1975 passed by the Additional District Judge, 1st Court Midnapore in Misc. Appeal No. 189 of 1974 reversing those of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sarbeswar Panda and ors. Vs. Bibhabasu Panda
Kolkata
Feb-17-1976
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 18(2)
AIR1977Cal288,82CWN28
Chiruddin Kha, Adv.
B.C. Ray, J. 1. This revisional application under Section 115, C. P. C. is directed against the order No. 105 passed on December 3, 1970 in Title Suit No. 53 of 1962 and it arises out...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhir Chandra Jana Vs. Amulya Chandra Misra and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-04-1968
Criminal
1969CriLJ1079
N.C. Talukdar, J.1. This appeal is against an order dated the 27th March, 1965, passed by Shri M. Bhattacharyya, Magistrate, 2nd Class, Tamluk, acquitting the accused respondents, who are four in number, under Sections 143 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDewan Singh and anr. Vs. Golap Singh and anr.
Kolkata
Jan-30-1973
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 5; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1
AIR1973Cal302,77CWN566
Bhupendra Kumar Panda, Adv.
ORDERN.C. Talukdar, J. 1. These two Rules are taken up together for disposal as they are interconnected. C. R. No. 2285 (R) of 1972 is ancillary to C. R. No. 859 (R) of 1972, depending on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPattidhar Saw Mill Vs. Bimal Krishna Pal and anr.
Kolkata
Mar-26-1976
Tenancy
Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 4, 5 and 5(2); ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 106; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
AIR1976Cal234
Bhupendra Kumar Panda and ;Mrinal Kanti Roy, Advs.
ORDERSalil Kumar Dutta, J.1. This rule under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was obtained by the Thika tenant against an appellate order dated October 5, 1972 passed by the Additional District Judge, 11th Court,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Kumar Roy and ors. Vs. Sm. Satya Bala Dutt and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-03-1972
PropertyCivil
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 106
AIR1973Cal339,78CWN19
Bhupendra Kumar Panda, Adv.
M.M. Dutt, J.1.This appeal is at the instance of the defendants and it arises out of a suit for ejectment.2. The suit premises consists of three floors in premises No. 8/1, Baithakkhana First Lane now known...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShantilal Saraogi and anr. Vs. Mukund Lal Kothari and anr.
Kolkata
Sep-10-1980
Property
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(1) and 13(6); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 99 - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 14, Rule 3; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 106
AIR1980Cal381
Bhupendra Kumar Panda and ;Mrinal Kanti Roy, Advs.
B.N. Maitra, J. 1. The plaintiffs have alleged that previously they were the owners of premises No. 2, Bysack Street Calcutta. On the 1st September, 1972, there was a decree by the Calcutta High Court in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNrimal Kumar Moulik and ors. Vs. Sm. Champabala Roy and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-25-1971
PropertyCivil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115
AIR1971Cal407,76CWN556
Hariprasanna Mukherji, ;Bhupendra Kumar Panda and ;Jayindranath Nanda, Advs.
Salil Kumar Datta, J.1. This is an appeal by defendants Nos. 1 to 11 against a judgment of concurrence decreeing the plaintiff's suit. The suit property is comprised in C. S. Plot No. 1158, khatian No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »