Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: bhoopathy · Page 1 of about 171 results (0.065 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 15 1990

Seetha Bai Vs. Rent and Accommodation Controller

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-15-1990

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Parts II and III

Reported in : ILR1990KAR4072; 1990(3)KarLJ284

Advocate for Respondent : Bhoopathy, HCGP

ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J.1. The first respondent initiated proceedings under Section 10A of the Karnataka Rent Control Act to evict the unauthorised occupant. The petitioner who is the owner questioned the proceedings and asserted that the building...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 1992

Mundas Laxman and Rudramuniswamy Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-05-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 228

Reported in : ILR1992KAR3676

Advocate for Respondent : D. Bhoopathy, HCGP for R-1 and R-2, ;K. Raghavendra Rao, Adv. for R-3 and ;P. Vishwanatha Shetty, Adv. for R-4

ORDERHanumanthappa, J. 1. Sri M. Raghavendra Achar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri P. Vishwanatha Shetty, learned Counsel for R-3, Sri K. Raghavendra Rao, learned Counsel for R-4 & Smt. Bhoopathy, learned HCGP for R-1 &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1992

Ganganarasaiah Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-1992

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 18 and 28; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 323A

Reported in : ILR1992KAR2629; 1993(2)KarLJ385

Advocate for Respondent : Bhoopathy, HCGP

ORDERHanumanthappa, J. 1. The petitioner who was appointed as Hamali on 2-7-1984 by the Department of Commercial Taxes on daily wage basis was terminated on the report submitted by the Lokayuktha without even serving a notice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 29 1991

K.K. Vasant Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-29-1991

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 133 and 226; Karnataka Forest Act, 1964 - Sections 1; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976; Forest Act, 1963; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Environment Protection Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR1992Kant256; ILR1991KAR1301; 1991(2)KarLJ518

Advocate for Respondent : Smt. D. Bhoopathy, Govt. Pleader, ;W.K. Sundarmurthy, ;R.J. Babu, ;K.R.D. Karanth and ;A.M. Farooq

ORDERChandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. This writ petition is filed by one K.K. Vasant -- A practising Advocate of Bangalore. He has averred in the petition that the writ petition which is filed under Art. 226 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2001

M. Radhakrishna Murthy Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-16-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19, 22, 28 and 35(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 23, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 323-A

Reported in : 2001(3)ALD330

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M. Surender Rao and ;Mr. M. Ranta Reddy, Advs.

ORDERSatya Brata Sinha, CJ1. This petition raises an interesting question as regards interpretation of Order XXIII, Rule 1 CPC vis-a-vis the power of the Administrative Tribunal to entertain an application under Section 19 of the Administrative...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2021

Jayamma Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-15-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

-1- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH, 2021 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.9723 OF2020(SC/ST) C/W WRIT PETITION NOs.5008/2020 (SC/ST), 915/2020 (SC/ST) IN...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2021

M/s Unidesign Builders And Developers Pvt Ltd Vs. National Commission ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-15-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

-1- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH, 2021 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.9723 OF2020(SC/ST) C/W WRIT PETITION NOs.5008/2020 (SC/ST), 915/2020 (SC/ST) IN...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2021

M/s Unidesign Builders Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-15-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

-1- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH, 2021 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.9723 OF2020(SC/ST) C/W WRIT PETITION NOs.5008/2020 (SC/ST), 915/2020 (SC/ST) IN...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2005

Y. Vijayalakshmi @ Rambha Vs. Manickam Narayanan, Proprietor, Seventh ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-08-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 142; Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2 and 303; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 190, 198, 199, 200 to 203, 205, 273, 302 and 317; Contract Act - Sections 183

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)33; IV(2005)BC482; 2005CriLJ3572; 2005(3)CTC480

Advocate for Respondent : B. Sriramulu, Senior Counsel for ;Sai Bharath, Adv.

ORDERS.R. Singharavelu, J.1. Criminal Original Petitions No.1225 and 1226 of 2005 are filed to call for the records in C.C.No.7527 and 7764 of 2004 respectively on the file of XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet and quash the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 2008

M. Sekar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Senior Superintendent of Pos ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-10-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct and Employment) Rules, 2001; Extra-Departmental Agents (Conduct and Service) Rules, 1964 - Rules 3 and 16; GDS (Conduct and Employment) Rules, 2001; Service Rules; Department of Posts, Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct and Employment) Rules, 2001 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ1158

Advocate for Respondent : K. Balachandran, Adv. for Respondents 1 and 2

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard the arguments of learned Counsels for private parties and the learned Assistant Central Government Standing Counsel representing the Union of India and perused the records.2. In all these twenty writ petitions, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial