Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: bheemasenachari ashrit · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 27 1958

Mallangowda and ors. Vs. Gavisiddangowda and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-27-1958

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 18, Rule 2 - Order 22, Rules 3 and 11 - Order 41, Rule 4; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49; Hyderabad Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 602

Reported in : AIR1959Kant194; AIR1959Mys194

Advocate for Respondent : Bheemasenachari Ashrit, Adv.

Iqbal Hussain, J. 1. This is an appeal against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Koppal, Richer District passed in Appeal No. 4/4 of 1358 Fasli confirming the judgment and decree passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1965

S. Kavali and Sons Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, I Circle, Hubli and anr ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-01-1965

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax, Act, 1956 - Sections 8(2), 8(2A), 9(1), 9(3) and 13

Reported in : (1965)2MysLJ712; [1966]18STC94(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : Bheemasenachari Ashrit, High Court Government Pleader

ORDER1. The petitioner-firm is a registered dealer under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. They have been assessed to a tax of Rs. 8,926.28 nP. under the Central Sales Tax Act for the period from 12th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1963

Appayya Naika and anr. Vs. State of Mysore and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-18-1963

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145, 145(1), 145(4), 439 and 539-B

Reported in : AIR1964Mys177; 1964CriLJ313

Advocate for Respondent : Bheemasenachari Ashrit, Govt. Pleader and ;K.R.D. Karanath, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision petition is directed against the order passed by the Executive First Class Magistrate, Puttur, South Kanara, in M.C. 20 of 1962 declaring that the second respondent--'A Party' -- was in possession of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial