Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: behram shroff · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.032 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 04 1999

Arun Construction Co. Vs. the Bombay Housing and Area Development Boar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-04-1999

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 173; Bombay Port Trust Act - Sections 87

Reported in : 2000(1)ALLMR3; 2000(2)BomCR450; (2000)1BOMLR509; 2000(2)MhLj239

Advocate for Respondent : Behram Shroff, Adv.

ORDERD.K. Deshmukh, J.1. Both the suits are filed by the same plaintiffs, defendants are also common, the question that arises for decision is also the same. Therefore, both the suits can be conveniently disposed of by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2000

Union of India Vs. Suresh Jayantilal Thanawala and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-17-2000

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11(d); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24 and 29(2) - Article 112; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 20

Reported in : 2000(2)ALLMR261; 2000(3)BomCR69

Advocate for Respondent : Y.S. Jahagirdar and ;Snehal Shah, Advs. i/b.; Purnanand & Co., ;G.P. Rege and ;Behram Shroff, Advs.

ORDERD.K. Deshmukh, J. 1. This is a notice of motion taken out by the defendants Nos. 1 & 2 for rejection of the plaint filed by the plaintiff under Order VII, Rule 11(d) of the Code...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 1993

Shriniwas Vithal Bhairi and ors. Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Gr. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-28-1993

Subject : CommercialLimitation

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 64(3), 92 and 407

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR269

Advocate for Respondent : U.J. Makhija and ;G.V. Murty, Advs. in W.P. 2420, 2263 and 3199/1988 and ;Behram Shroff, Adv. for respondent No. 3 in W.P. No. 2263 of 1988

B.P. Saraf, J.1. All these three writ petitions are directed against a Circular issued by the Sr. Ward Officer ( Markets ) Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay in regard to recovery of service charges from the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 22 2003

Jaysinh Morarji Popat and anr. Vs. Gulabben Hansraj Dedhia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-22-2003

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1977 - Sections 2(25), 76, 91(3) and 91(5); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(11)

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR665; 2003(6)BomCR206; 2003(4)MhLj795

Advocate for Respondent : U.J. Makhija, Adv., i/b., Rustomji Ginwala For Respondent Nos. 8 to 19, ;G.D. Dave, Adv., i/b., K.A. Sampat For Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and ;Behram Shroff, Adv. For Respondent Nos. 4 to 6

D. K. Deshmukh, J. 1. By this Appeal, appellants challenge the order dated 6/7th April, 1994 passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in WritPetition No. 1987 of 1988. That Writ Petition was filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial