Advanced Search Results
Smt. C. Rajeshwari Devi and Others Vs. Karegowda Alias Shanthaveera an ...
Karnataka
Mar-21-2000
Family
Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 10 and 19; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
II(2001)DMC158; ILR2000KAR4003; 2001(3)KarLJ74
Sri Bapu Heddur Shetty and ;Sri V.B. Shivakumar, Advs. and ;Sri V.K. Narayan Swamy, Government Pleader
ORDER1. The first petitioner who is the wife and the second and third petitioners who are the children of the first respondent are aggrieved of the order passed by the second respondent-Family Court in exercise of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. Nagaraju Vs. Union of India and Another
Karnataka
Jun-14-1990
Property
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 4(1), 5(1) and 6(1)
AIR1991Kant60; 1991(1)KarLJ118
Bapu Heddur Shetti, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel
ORDER1. The short point for consideration is whether the order passed under Annexure-O purported to be in exercise of the power conferred on the authority under S. 6(1) of the Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorised occupants)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Rohit Dandekar Vs. Dr. Raj Kavitha
Karnataka
Aug-21-2003
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 26; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19
ILR2003KAR4431
Bapu Heddurshetti, Adv. For C/R
Nayak, J.1. Both the Appeals are preferred by Dr. Rohit Dandekar, who is the father of the ward, Paranukush by name, being aggrieved by the common Judgment and Order dated 6.2.2001 made on I.A.s 5 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Nalini Sunder Vs. Sri G.V. Sunder
Karnataka
Sep-21-2002
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2
AIR2003Kant86; I(2003)DMC254; ILR2002KAR4734
Bapu Heddur Shetty, Adv.
Tirath S. Thakur, J. 1. This appeal by the wife calls in question the correctness of a Judgment and Decree passed by the Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bangalore in M. C. No. 419/1988 whereby the said...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWorkmen of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others
Karnataka
Aug-05-1992
Labour and Industrial
Employees State Insurance (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rule 50; Payment Of Bonus Act - Sections 2(13) and 11; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Payment Of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(4), 2(9) and 95; The Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1928 - Sections 4
ILR1992KAR2689; 1992(3)KarLJ610; (1993)ILLJ833Kant
Bapu Heddur Shetty, ;Smt. D. Bhoopathy, ;M. Panna and Cariappa, Advs.
1. The workmen of Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, represented by their Association, are calling in question the constitutional validity of Section 2(9) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, as amended by Act, 29 of 1989...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBoskails Westminster Deadging by Rosmolenwag Vs. New Mangalore Port Tr ...
Karnataka
Nov-25-1994
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 14
ILR1995KAR224; 1994(5)KarLJ473
B.V. Acharya, Adv. General for R-1 and ;Bapu Heddur Shetty, Central Government Stdg. Counsel for R-2
ORDERRaveendran, J 1. This Writ Petition relates to the award of a Civil Engineering Contract known as 'CONTRACT C-3 : Capital Dredging' by New Mangalore Port Trust (the first Respondent herein, also referred to as NMPT)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPatel Enterprises Vs. M.P. Ahuja
Karnataka
Nov-04-1992
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 27 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 43(2)
ILR1992KAR3772
H.R. Venkataramanaiah, Adv. for R-1, ;Bapu Heddur Shetti, Addl. Central Govt. Stdg. Counsel for R-2 and R-3
ORDER 39 RULES 1 & 2 - Prima facie case includes nature of suit and maintainability - No temporary Injunction, if suit not maintainable. One of the factors to be considered by the trial Court while...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSgt. Jeevan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Karnataka
Mar-04-1992
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 20, 22, 24, 73 and 189(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 15(2), 13 to 18; Constitution of India - Article 20(2)
ILR1992KAR1027; 1992(2)KarLJ408
Bapu Heddur Shetty, Addl. Central Govt. Stdg.
Venkatachala, J.1. These Writ Appeals, W.A.Nos. 78/92, 141/92 and 152/92, are preferred under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, by the petitioners respectively in Writ Petitions, W.P.Nos. 20048/89, 12320/90 and 5850/90, questioning the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Behroze Ramyar Batha Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer
Karnataka
Aug-28-1991
CivilProperty
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A and 6
ILR1991KAR3556; 1992(1)KarLJ589
S. Shivaram, Govt. Adv. for R-1, R-3 and R-4, ;H.B. Datar, Sr. Adv., ;M.H. Datar, Adv. for R-2 and ;B.V. Acharya, Sr. Adv. for R-5
S. Mohan, C.J.1. All these four Appeals can be dealt with under a common Judgment. They arise out of the Judgment of Justice Murlidher Rao dated 20-7-1987 in W.Ps.10881 & 82/87 and 10895 & 86/87.2. What...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›