Advanced Search Results

Bhoop Singh Vs. Bhori Lal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1972Delhi245

Advocate for Respondent : Balmukand Gupta, Adv.

ORDER1. This Civil Revision has been filed by Bhoop Singh, defendant in Suit No. 1123 of 1967, on the file of Shri Jagdish Chandra, Judge, Small Cause Court, Delhi against the judgment and decree of the...

Balbir Singh, Yashin, Dulichand and Mohan Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 302 and 404; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164

Reported in : AIR1997SC1704; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)515; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)551; 1997CriLJ1179; 1997(1)Crimes67(SC); JT1997(1)SC491; RLW1997(2)SC247; 1997(1)SCALE334

ORDER1. These appeals arise out of the common judgment dated October 11, 1985 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in D.E. Criminal Appeal No. 788 of 1974. D.E. Criminal Appeal No. 64 of...

State Vs. Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 75(2), 93 and 307; Constitution of India - Articles 72, 161 and 361; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(12), 53(16), 81(1), 82(10), 89(3), 122, 123, and 146; Supreme Court Rules - Order 21, Rule 5

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR383; 1960CriLJ1558

Advocate for Respondent : Rajni Patel, ;N.A. Palkhiwala and ;S.R. Vakil, Advs., ;I/b., Mulla and Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caree, ;K.M. Nanavati, ;R.B. Kotwal and ;M.V. Paranjpe, Advs. for ;Western India Advocate Association

Chainani, C.J.(1) In Criminal Reference No. 159 of 1959, which was made to this Court under Section 307 Cr. P. C. by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, a Division Bench of this Court, consisting of Shelat...

Bhanwarlal Vs. Bhulibai and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1972Raj203; 1971(4)WLN416

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Rastogi, Adv.

C.M. Lodha, J. 1. A preliminary objection has been raised in this appeal on behalf of the respondents that the appeal has abated as a whole on account of the failure on the part of the...

Balmukand Vs. Pancham

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All400

Mahmood, J.1. The facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal may be briefly recapitulated as follows.2. One Musammat Umedi Kuar, by a sale-deed executed on the 10th July 1883, sold the property now in suit...

Smt. Manohari Devi and ors. Vs. Choudhury Sibanava Das and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1983Ori135

Advocate for Respondent : B. Patnaik, ;R. Mohanty and ;A.K. Padhi, Advs.

B.N. Misra, J. 1. Plaintiffs 1, 2 and 3 wives of brothers Puranmal, Matrumal and Prabhudayal respectively, have preferred this appeal against the judgment arsd decree of the learned 4th. Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuttack dismissing their...

Hari Singh and anr. Vs. Umrao Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1979All65

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Singh, ;N.P. Singh and ;N.S. Singhal, Advs.

M.N. Shukla, J.1. This is a defendants' appeal arising out of a suit for specific performance. The relief of specific performance was not granted by the Courts below but the suit was decreed for recovery of...

Present: Mr. B.S. Seemer Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

CWP No.20770 of 2012 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.20770 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.03.2014 Suresh Kumar ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents...

Savitri Ramayya Hegde Vs. Holebasappa Murgeppa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932Bom257; (1932)34BOMLR198; 137Ind.Cas.600

Baker, J.1. The facts are that one Govindappa owned the land in suit, and made a gift thereof to Venkappa subject to the condition that Rs. 25 was to be paid annually to one Vishweshwar Shastri...

Akella Venkata Rama Subrahmanya Sarma Vs. Annangi Sreeramamurti

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15, 17 and 22; Tenancy Act; Hindu Law

Reported in : 2008(5)ALD534; 2008(5)ALT369

Advocate for Respondent : R.V. Prasad, Adv.

P.S. Narayana, J.1. The unsuccessful defendant in O.S. No. 51 of 1983 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Amalapuram, had preferred the present appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree made therein directing the...