Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: b v muralidhar · Page 1 of about 29 results (0.082 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 11 1997

Maistry Ramaiah (Deceased) by L.R. Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation o ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-11-1997

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Sections 114

Reported in : ILR1999KAR1003; 1998(5)KarLJ197

Advocate for Respondent : Sri B.V. Muralidhar, ;Sri H.J. Sundar Kumar, ;Sri G. Balakrishna Shastry and ;Sri C.J.B. Rao, Advs.

ORDER1. In this writ petition, the petitioner had challenged endorsement dated 4-2-1986, copy as at Annexure 'T' to writ petition, whereby the respondent 1-Corporation had revoked the khata of the property in respect of 1/2 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1984

K.M.S. Rice and Flour Mills Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-11-1984

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Rice Procurement (Levy) Order, 1984; ;Karnataka Rice Procurement (Levy) (Amendment) Order, 1993;

Reported in : ILR1994KAR1440

Advocate for Respondent : B.V. Muralidhar, HCGP

ORDERHanumanthappa, J.1. The Point for Consideration in these Writ Petitions is whether the dealer is required to obtain both the Release Certificate and Transfer Certificate as required under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and liable to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2001

H. Kemparaju Vs. the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-28-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 70(1); Constitution of India - Artilces 226 and 227; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 115

Reported in : ILR2001KAR4722; 2002(4)KarLJ363

Advocate for Respondent : B.V. Muralidhar, Government Adv. for Respondents 1 and 2 and ;S.J. Chouta, Adv. for Caveator/Respondent 5

ORDERM.P. Chinnappa, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri Jayakumar S. Patil, the learned Government Advocate Sri B.V. Muralidhar for the respondents 1 and respondents 2. Though notices were served on the 3rd and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 04 2000

C. Thyagarajan and anr. Vs. Corporation of the City of Bangalore and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-04-2000

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2002ACJ1282

Advocate for Respondent : B.V. Muralidhar and ;H.J. Sundar Kumar, Advs.

V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus or direction directing the respondent No. 1 Corporation to pay a sum of Rs. 10,00,000 as compensation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 2010

K N Prabhakar S/O Ningappa Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-04-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : SRI R G KOLLE. AGA ; SRI B V MURALIDHAR. ADV.

ORDERJ.S.KHEHAR, C.J. (Oral): 1. Sri Nagaraja N. Naidu, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri R.G.Kolle. learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No. 1 and Sri B.V. Muralidhar, learned counsel for respondent No.2.2. Learned counsel for the rival...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2010

Sri P. Premchand, and ors Vs. Sri Moolendra Kumar Gandhi and ors

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-02-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Paras Jain, Adv; Sri B.V. Muralidhar, Adv

1. This petition is filed seeking the review of the order, dated 4.10.2010 passed in W.P.No.2107/09. The review petition is filed by the respondent Nos.3 to 7 in the writ petition proceedings. To avoid the confusion,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2012

A. N. Ramalingegowda and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its Secr ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. These three petitions, though filed a year apart from each of the previous petition, the subject matter of these three petitions is the same. The subject matter as noticed in the first writ petition is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2012

The Commissioner Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Vs. Sri Munichandr ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-10-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 43 Rule 2, Order 41 Rule 5, Order 39 Rule 1, 2, Section 151

Advocate for Respondent : M.RAVIKUMAR, PRAKASH T HEBBAR, M.I.ARUN, B.RAJANNA, Advs.

H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):1. Sri B.V.Muralidhar, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant/B.B.M.P, after arguing the matter for sometime, submits that as the suit is of the year 2007, the trial Court may be directed to dispose of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 2010

M/S.S.K.Consumer Products Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of City of ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-04-2010

Subject : MRTP

1. Appellant is the plaintiff before the court below, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20-7-2005. Made in O.S.No. 1539/1999 passed by the XVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore preferred this appeal.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2008

Smt. Bojamma and ors. Vs. the Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-30-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 14

Reported in : 2008(6)KarLJ240

Advocate for Respondent : B.V. Muralidhar, Additional Government Adv.

ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. The petitioners herein pursuant to the compromise decree passed in R.F.A. No. 2013 of 2004, filed an application praying for registration of their names as the owners of the Coffee Estate, under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial