Advanced Search Results
Maistry Ramaiah (Deceased) by L.R. Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation o ...
Karnataka
Dec-11-1997
Property
Constitution of India - Article 226; Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Sections 114
ILR1999KAR1003; 1998(5)KarLJ197
Sri B.V. Muralidhar, ;Sri H.J. Sundar Kumar, ;Sri G. Balakrishna Shastry and ;Sri C.J.B. Rao, Advs.
ORDER1. In this writ petition, the petitioner had challenged endorsement dated 4-2-1986, copy as at Annexure 'T' to writ petition, whereby the respondent 1-Corporation had revoked the khata of the property in respect of 1/2 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.M.S. Rice and Flour Mills Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-11-1984
Commercial
Karnataka Rice Procurement (Levy) Order, 1984; ;Karnataka Rice Procurement (Levy) (Amendment) Order, 1993;
ILR1994KAR1440
B.V. Muralidhar, HCGP
ORDERHanumanthappa, J.1. The Point for Consideration in these Writ Petitions is whether the dealer is required to obtain both the Release Certificate and Transfer Certificate as required under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and liable to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH. Kemparaju Vs. the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore and ors.
Karnataka
Jun-28-2001
Service
Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 70(1); Constitution of India - Artilces 226 and 227; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 115
ILR2001KAR4722; 2002(4)KarLJ363
B.V. Muralidhar, Government Adv. for Respondents 1 and 2 and ;S.J. Chouta, Adv. for Caveator/Respondent 5
ORDERM.P. Chinnappa, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri Jayakumar S. Patil, the learned Government Advocate Sri B.V. Muralidhar for the respondents 1 and respondents 2. Though notices were served on the 3rd and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
C. Thyagarajan and anr. Vs. Corporation of the City of Bangalore and o ...
Karnataka
Apr-04-2000
Civil
2002ACJ1282
B.V. Muralidhar and ;H.J. Sundar Kumar, Advs.
V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus or direction directing the respondent No. 1 Corporation to pay a sum of Rs. 10,00,000 as compensation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK N Prabhakar S/O Ningappa Vs. the State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Nov-04-2010
Land Acquisition
SRI R G KOLLE. AGA ; SRI B V MURALIDHAR. ADV.
ORDERJ.S.KHEHAR, C.J. (Oral): 1. Sri Nagaraja N. Naidu, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri R.G.Kolle. learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No. 1 and Sri B.V. Muralidhar, learned counsel for respondent No.2.2. Learned counsel for the rival...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri P. Premchand, and ors Vs. Sri Moolendra Kumar Gandhi and ors
Karnataka
Nov-02-2010
Land Acquisition
Sri Paras Jain, Adv; Sri B.V. Muralidhar, Adv
1. This petition is filed seeking the review of the order, dated 4.10.2010 passed in W.P.No.2107/09. The review petition is filed by the respondent Nos.3 to 7 in the writ petition proceedings. To avoid the confusion,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. N. Ramalingegowda and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its Secr ...
Karnataka
Feb-07-2012
Land Acquisition
1. These three petitions, though filed a year apart from each of the previous petition, the subject matter of these three petitions is the same. The subject matter as noticed in the first writ petition is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Vs. Sri Munichandr ...
Karnataka
Jul-10-2012
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 43 Rule 2, Order 41 Rule 5, Order 39 Rule 1, 2, Section 151
M.RAVIKUMAR, PRAKASH T HEBBAR, M.I.ARUN, B.RAJANNA, Advs.
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):1. Sri B.V.Muralidhar, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant/B.B.M.P, after arguing the matter for sometime, submits that as the suit is of the year 2007, the trial Court may be directed to dispose of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.S.K.Consumer Products Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of City of ...
Karnataka
Nov-04-2010
MRTP
1. Appellant is the plaintiff before the court below, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20-7-2005. Made in O.S.No. 1539/1999 passed by the XVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore preferred this appeal.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Bojamma and ors. Vs. the Tahsildar
Karnataka
Jun-30-2008
Property
Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 14
2008(6)KarLJ240
B.V. Muralidhar, Additional Government Adv.
ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. The petitioners herein pursuant to the compromise decree passed in R.F.A. No. 2013 of 2004, filed an application praying for registration of their names as the owners of the Coffee Estate, under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »