Advanced Search Results

Sher Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2187

Advocate for Respondent : B.T. Singh, Adv.

S.D. Pandit, J. 1. Sher Singh s/o Teja Singh r/o house No. 2. Village Tikri, Delhi stands convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions case No. 112/87 on 12th November, 1987 and is sentenced to...

Manohar Singh and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2(1), 10(7) and 17

Reported in : 14(1978)DLT37; ILR1978Delhi53

Advocate for Respondent : B.T. Singh, Adv.

S. Rangarajan, J.1. Eight petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (New) and Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order, dated 20th October,...

Farida and Another Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)230; 81(1999)DLT119; (1999)123PLR20

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Amita Gupta and ; Mr. B.T. Singh, Advs.

ORDERCrl. W.No. 720/99. 1.Issue notice to the respondents to show cause why the petition be not admitted, returnable on 26th October, 1999. 2. Mr. B.T. Singh accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 & 3. 3....

Mukesh Alias Muki Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 307; Evidence Act - Sections 27 and 114

Reported in : 1994IVAD(Delhi)990; 1995CriLJ1769; 1995(3)Crimes317; 57(1995)DLT203; 1995(32)DRJ74

Advocate for Respondent : B.T. Singh, and ; A.S. Anand, Advs.

P.K. Bahri, J.1. The appellant-Mukesh alias Muki has been convicted of an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code vide judgment dated August 29, 1989 and has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for...

Sita Ram Pandey Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437

Reported in : 1995(32)DRJ722

Mohd. Sharnim, J.(1) This is an application by the petitioner for release on bail. (2) Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Lekhi, Senior Advocate, has contended that the petitioner is innocent. He has been falsely implicated...

State Vs. Dinesh Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313(3); Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1986CriLJ1527; 1986(11)DRJ1

Malik Sharief-ud-din, J. (1) This appeal is again it the acquittal recorded by Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, on 8-5-85 in favor of the respondent under Section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (for short...

Delhi Bottling Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and an ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1979CriLJ290

ORDERR.N. Aggarwal, J.1. The facts relevant for the decision of this petition are these : on 1st May, 1967, Food Inspector M. M. Kathpalia had purchased a sample of gold spot (carbonated water) for analysis from...

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Het Ram and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7

Reported in : 15(1979)DLT195

Dalip K. Kapur, J.(1) This is a revisional petition under the criminal procedure code (Section 40 read with Section 397) arising out of the conviction of the respondent under Section 7 read with Section 16 of...

Dildar Ahmed and Ram Kartar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 7

Reported in : 1977RLR389

F.S. Gill, J. (1) On 19.7.73, appellant Ram Kartar was driving a truck with 20 milk cans. 4 Food Inspectors took 4 samples from 4 milk cans. Driver on enquiry told Inspectors that Dildar Ahmed owned...

Prabhu Dayal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1986CriLJ383; 1986(1)Crimes3; 1986(10)DRJ147

R.N. Aggarwal, J.(1) The appellant Prabhu Dayal has been convicted for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life. Dissatisfied with the conviction and sentence, he has...