Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: b s bakshi · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 30 2001

Labh Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-30-2001

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 41, 42, 43, 50 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197

Reported in : 2002CriLJ28; 2002(1)WLC692; 2002(1)WLN545

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Vyas, Adv.

Hon'ble Garg, J.1. The abovenamed three appeals are being decided by this common judgment as they have been preferred against the common judgment and order dated 24.2.1999 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Bikaner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2003

Usmanbhai Chandbhai Mansuri Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-08-2003

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 29, 42, 53A, 67 and 114; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164

Reported in : (2003)3GLR1982

Advocate for Respondent : B.D. Desai, A.P.P. for respondent No. 1 and; Asim J. Pandya, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

H. H. MEHTA, J. 1.The appellant who was an accused in Sessions Case No. 358 of 1995 before the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 9, Ahmedabad, has, by preferring this appeal under Section 374(2)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2005

UnimIn India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(187)ELT377Tri(Mum.)bai

1. These stay applications seeking waiver of pre-deposit of duty demanded and penalties imposed and stay recovery thereof arose out of the order of Commissioner of Central Excise, Daman. The applicants are M/s Unimin India Limited,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 14 1971

Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, Jabalpur Vs. the Central India Elect ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-14-1971

Subject : ElectricityArbitration

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 6(1), 7, 7A, 7A(1), 7A(4), 12, 36 and 37; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 17 and 29

Reported in : AIR1972MP47; 1972MPLJ199

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Bakshi, Adv.

A.P. Sen, J.1. This order will dispose of Misc. (First) Appeal No. 34 of 1970 (The Central India Electric Supply Co., Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board).These are appeals under Section 39(1)(iii) of the Arbitration Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1971

Harbanssingh Vs. the Trust Committee Shri Gurusingh Sabha Gurudwara Tr ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-28-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1972MP61

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Bakshi, Adv.

Bishambhar Dayal, C.J. 1. This is a Letters Patent Appeal against an order of a learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing a miscellaneous first appeal. The question is whether this Letters Patent Appeal is competent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2004

Mahendra Doshi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Apr-23-2004

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(1)SLJ155CAT

1. Aggrieved by the order dated 28.8.2000 of the President imposing on him the penalty of dismissal from service the applicant has preferred the present O.A. He has sought for the quashing of the order.2. This...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1957

Surajmal Arjundas Vaidya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-09-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 226; Mineral Concession Rules, 1949 - Rule 60; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1958MP103

Advocate for Respondent : M. Adhikari, Adv., ;R.K. Thakur, Adv. (for No. 3), ;B.S. Bakshi, Adv. (for No. 5) and ;M.W. Puranik, Adv. (for Nos. 7 and 8)

M. Hidayatullah, C.J.1. The following question has been referred for the opinion of the Full Bench :'Can a writ of this High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution be issued to bind the Central Government...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1998

Balwan Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-20-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 323

Reported in : 1999CriLJ2261

Advocate for Respondent : Vasudev Singh, D.A.G.

V.K. Bali, J. 1. Appellants Balwan Singh, Jai singh and Inder Singh real brothers were tried with their co-accused Rakesh Kumar under Sections 302, 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Whereas their...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2002

Uniplas India Limited Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-03-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409, 415 and 420; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3488; 97(2002)DLT714; 2002(62)DRJ669

Advocate for Respondent : Mukta Gupta and ; Vikas Arora, Advs.

Khan, (J)1. Petitioner and respondent No. 2 are fighting it out for Rs. 12 lacs or more. The dispute has spilled over leading to lodging of FIR No. 65/01 u/s 420 IPC at PS Vasant Vihar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2008

Ex. Wing Commander V. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 124; Custom Rules; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Air Force Regulations, 1961; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(5) and 17; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT210

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Katyal and ; Ranjeet Kumar Jha, Advs.

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The Air Force personnel deputed to ferry AN-32 aircrafts from Russia to India, utilized the stoppage on the way at Dubai to purchase dutiable and contraband goods and on detection, the same...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial