Advanced Search Results

Union of India Vs. V. Sriharan @ ,Murugan and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRL.) No.48 OF2014Union of India …Petitioner VERSUS V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors. …Respondents With Writ Petition (Crl.) No.185/2014 Writ Petition (Crl.) No.150/2014 Writ...

In Re: Mohamed Rahimullah and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : CriminalFamily

Reported in : AIR1947Mad461; (1947)1MLJ70

ORDERYahya Ali, J.1. This is a reference by the Chief Presidency Magistrate, under Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, made in the following circumstances. Kurshid Begum filed an application under Section 488 of the...

Mohamad BIn B Pocker Vs. the Reserve Bank of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 14TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 29360 of 2012 (T) PETITIONER: ------------ MOHAMAD BIN B POCKER AGED...

Pudusseri Vadakkethil Vikraman Alias Kunhikuttan Nair Vs. V. Krishnan ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Oaths Act, 1873 - Sections 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1953Mad396; (1952)IMLJ452

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Janakiram, Adv.

ORDERBasheer Ahmed Sayeed, J.1. The defendant who is the petitioner in tins civil revision petition seeks to revise the order of the Small Cause Judge who gave a decree in favour of the plaintiff under the...

Pavitri Vs. Katheesumma

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Muhammadan Law; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1959Ker319

Advocate for Respondent : B. Pocker, Adv.

Vaidialingam, J. 1. The short point for decision in this Second Appeal is as to whether an illegitimate daughter of a Mohammadan is entitled to get maintenance from the assets of her putative father in the...

Vemana Venkama Naidu and ors. Vs. Sayed Vilijan Chisty and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Muhammadan Law; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 41; Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 44 and 91

Reported in : AIR1951Mad399; (1950)2MLJ587

Advocate for Respondent : B. Pocker and ;T. Venkatadri, Advs.

Viswanatha Sastri, J.1. Defendants 1, 3 and 4 are the appellants. Plaintiffs, who are Muslims, sued for partition and recovery of possession of certain lands on the ground that they had been improperly sold when they...

Kochu Muhmmad Kunju Ismail Vs. Mohmmad Kadeja Umma

Court : Kerala

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Muhammadan Law; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 494

Reported in : AIR1959Ker151; 1959CriLJ591

Advocate for Respondent : B. Pocker, Adv.

Varadaraja Iyengar, J.1. This appeal is by the complainant in a private prosecution for offences under Section 494 and Section 114 I.P.C. and is directed against the judgment of acquittal entered by the court below.2. The...

Avalath Kunhikoya Thangal and anr. Vs. Dappoyil Ahmad Kutty and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 21, Rule 58; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3 and 52

Reported in : AIR1952Mad59; (1951)2MLJ496

Advocate for Respondent : B. Pocker, Adv.

Balakrishna Ayyar, J. 1. In O. S. No. 1193 of 1944 on the file of the Court of the District Munsiff, Calicut, there was a decree for the redemption of a 'kanom.' Subsequent to the decree...

State of Madras Vs. Sayed Abdurahiman Baffakki Thangal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1 and 123

Reported in : AIR1954Mad926; (1954)IIMLJ236

Advocate for Respondent : B. Pocker, Adv.

Rajagopala Ayyangar, J.1. The State of Madras who is the petitioner in this revision petition is the second defendant in the suit filed for recovery of certain transport charges stated to have been incurred by the...

Narayana Kekunnaya and anr. Vs. Meloth Chathukutti Nambiar and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : PropertyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 90; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 76; Kerala Revenue Recovery Act - Sections 59

Reported in : AIR1959Ker94

Advocate for Respondent : V.P. Gopalan Nambiar,; B. Pocker and; Srinivasa Rao,

C.A. Vaidialingam, J. 1. The pfaintiffs, whose suit O. S. 212/1951 for redemption of the mortgage after taking an account has been dismissed by the learned Subordinate Judge of South Kanara, are the appellants before us.2....