Advanced Search Results

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Maan Bahadur and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(2007)ACC738

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B.P. Nautiyal

Rajeev Gupta, C.J.1. Mr. T.A. Khan, learned Counsel for the appellant, Mr. B.P. Nautiyal, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1.2. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the appeal is finally heard.3. This...

State of Uttarakhand and ors. Vs. Kilkileshwar Mining Company and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Commercial

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. B.P. Nautiyal

V.K. Bist, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 23.10.2008 passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 76 (M/S) 2008 'Kilkileshwar Mining Company and Anr....

Ramesh Chandra (Sri) and anr. Vs. Ist Additional District Judge and or ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Cantonment (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3 and 3(4); Cantonments (House Accommodation) Act, 1923 - Sections 3(1); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 1, 1(3), 2, 2(1), 3, 11, 12(3), 13(3), 14, 20(4), 21 and 21(1); Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(3), 3, 60 and 69; United Provinces Town Area Act - Sections 7; Uttar Pradesh Cantonment (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1952; United provinces Town Areas Act, 1914; Under the Public Health Act, 1875; Compulsory Purchase Act, 1965; Madras Buildings (lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 14 (1); Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 16 and 16(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 22

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC812

Advocate for Respondent : B.P. Nauityal and; Hari Mohari Bhatia, Advs.

Rajesh Tandon, J.Heard Sri Arvind Vashisth, Counsel for the petitioners and Sri. B.P. Nautiyal and Sri Hari Mohan Bhatia, Counsel for the respondents.FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:-1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed...

Deewan Chandra Giri S/O Late Shri Hari Giri Vs. Pooran Giri S/O Late S ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Civil

Prafulla C. Pant, J.1. This appeal preferred under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is directed against the Judgment and decree dated 20.11.1998, passed by V Additional District Judge, Nainital, in civil appeal No....

Dr. Chitra Agarwal Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2006Utr78

Cyriac Joseph, C.J.1. The petitioner claims to be a practising Doctor who is having an Ultrasound Centre and X-ray Clinic known as Chitra Ultrasound Centre at 5 - New Road, Dehradun. The said Ultrasound Centre has...

Sarvshri Satysheel and Company Kailash Gait, Muni Ki Reti, Tehri Garhw ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Heard Mr. B.P.Nautiyal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Jayavardhan Kandpal, Advocate, for the petitioners and Mr. K. C. Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 16.12.1996...

Tota Ram Panthari. Vs. Ratnambar Dutt Joshi and Others.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Civil

Acts : U.P. Urban Building (Regulation of Letting Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Section 21(1), 17, 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41 Rule 22 and 33; Municipality Act - Section 263

1. These petitions have been filed by the petitioners challenging the judgment and order dated 24.04.2007 passed by Prescribed Authority, Kotdwar, District-Pauri Garhwal in Rent Case No. 11 of 2005 Ratnamber Dutt Joshi and others vs....

Ram Lal and anr. Vs. Amar Jeet Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC132; 2005(4)AWC3119(UHC)

Advocate for Respondent : B.P. Nautiyal,; T.A. Khan and; D.S. Patni, Advs.

Rajesh Tandon and B. S. Verma, JJ.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 2.12.1994 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hardwar in Motor Accident Case No. 42 of 1990, Ram Lal and...

Kishan Chandra Vs. General Manager (Admn. and Personnel), Bharat Heavy ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 381 and 411; Evidence Act

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC74(UHC); [2005(104)FLR31]; (2005)1UPLBEC12

Advocate for Respondent : B.P. Nautiyal and; H.M. Bhatia, Advs.

Prafulla C. Pant, J.1. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought mandamus for arrears of salary, pensioner benefits including payment of provident fund dues...

Narender Singh (Shri) Vs. Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21; Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 16(1) and 16(2)

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC30

Advocate for Respondent : B.P. Nautiyal, Adv. for respondent No. 3

Prafulla C. Pant, J.1. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner- tenant has sought writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the orders dated 20.12.2002...