Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: b nayak · Page 1 of about 95 results (0.101 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 04 2001

Anarkali Sarabhai Vs. Commissioner of Gift-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-04-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gift-tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2

Reported in : [2003]259ITR97(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Nayak, Adv. for R.P. Bhatt, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J.1. At the instance of the assessee as well at the instance of the Revenue, the following questions of law are referred to us for our decision in respect of the assessment year 1976-77...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1993

S.B. Jogdand Vs. Shrinivas S/O Shaligram Totla and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-22-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166, 192 and 218

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR86

Advocate for Respondent : B.A. Darak, Adv. for the respondent No. 1 and ;V.B. Nayak, A.P.P. for respondent No. 2

N.P. Chapalgaonker, J. 1. Applicant, who is in service of the State of Maharashtra and was working as Chief Officer of the Municipal Council at Parali Vaidyanath at the relevant time, has filed this application before...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1993

Prithviraj S/O. Ambalal Patel Vs. Bhupendra S/O. Jasubhai Patel and an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-06-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR719

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Deshpande, Adv. for respondent No. 1, ;V.B. Nayak, A.P.P., for State-respondent No. 2

M.S. Vaidya, J.1. The respondent No. 1-Bhupendra s/o Ambalal Patel was an employee of the petitioner as his Branch Manager-cum-Chief Accountant for several years prior to the year 1989. In an audit which was concluded on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 06 2003

Madhavgir S/O Gururatangir Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 304; Evidence Act - Sections 25

Reported in : 2005(1)MhLj161

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Nayak, A.P.P.

A.S. Bagga, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18-8-1998, passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded in Sessions Case No. 126 of 1997, thereby convicting the appellant/original accused for the offence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1999

Govind Chhapabhai Patel Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-13-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 142(1), 143(3), 147 and 148

Reported in : (1999)156CTR(Guj)353; [1999]240ITR628(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Nayak, Adv. for Manish R. Bhatt

B.C. Patel, J. 1. The petitioner has approached this Court by invoking Art. 226 of the Constitution of India challenging notice dt. 28th August, 1995, Annexure 'A', issued by the respondent under s. 148 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2002

AshwIn Vanaspati Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-25-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 43(1)

Reported in : [2002]255ITR26(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Nayak, Adv. for; Manish R. Bhatt, Adv.

D.A. Mehta, J.1. The applicant-assessee had proposed the following four questions of law under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2001

Sadhuram Gordhandas Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-14-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3) and 147

Reported in : (2002)172CTR(Guj)201; [2002]253ITR695(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Nayak, Adv. for Manish R. Bhatt, Adv.

D.A. Mehta, J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'B', has referred the following six questions for the opinion of this court in compliance with the directions issued by this court under Section 256(2) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2002

Usha Fertilizers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-29-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1)

Reported in : [2004]269ITR591(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Nayak, Adv. for; Manish R. Bhatt, Adv.

D. A. Mehta, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'A', has referred the following question :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2001

Navjivan Oil Mills Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-19-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143, 144, 145, 147 and 271(1)

Reported in : [2001]252ITR417(Guj)

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Nayak, Adv. for R.P. Bhatt, Adv.

D.A. Mehta, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench,'B', has referred the following two questions for the opinion of this court :'(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, theTribunal was justified...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2002

Cit Vs. Electric Control Gear Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-21-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN722(Guj)

A.R. Dave, J.At the instance of the revenue, the following questions have been referred to this court for its opinion by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench' B under the provisions of section 256(1) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial