Advanced Search Results
Anarkali Sarabhai Vs. Commissioner of Gift-tax
Gujarat
Sep-04-2001
Direct Taxation
Gift-tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2
[2003]259ITR97(Guj)
B.B. Nayak, Adv. for R.P. Bhatt, Adv.
M.S. Shah, J.1. At the instance of the assessee as well at the instance of the Revenue, the following questions of law are referred to us for our decision in respect of the assessment year 1976-77...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.B. Jogdand Vs. Shrinivas S/O Shaligram Totla and anr.
Mumbai
Sep-22-1993
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166, 192 and 218
1994(2)BomCR86
B.A. Darak, Adv. for the respondent No. 1 and ;V.B. Nayak, A.P.P. for respondent No. 2
N.P. Chapalgaonker, J. 1. Applicant, who is in service of the State of Maharashtra and was working as Chief Officer of the Municipal Council at Parali Vaidyanath at the relevant time, has filed this application before...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrithviraj S/O. Ambalal Patel Vs. Bhupendra S/O. Jasubhai Patel and an ...
Mumbai
Jan-06-1993
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138
1993(3)BomCR719
A.P. Deshpande, Adv. for respondent No. 1, ;V.B. Nayak, A.P.P., for State-respondent No. 2
M.S. Vaidya, J.1. The respondent No. 1-Bhupendra s/o Ambalal Patel was an employee of the petitioner as his Branch Manager-cum-Chief Accountant for several years prior to the year 1989. In an audit which was concluded on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Madhavgir S/O Gururatangir Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-06-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 304; Evidence Act - Sections 25
2005(1)MhLj161
V.B. Nayak, A.P.P.
A.S. Bagga, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18-8-1998, passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded in Sessions Case No. 126 of 1997, thereby convicting the appellant/original accused for the offence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovind Chhapabhai Patel Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
Gujarat
Jul-13-1999
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 142(1), 143(3), 147 and 148
(1999)156CTR(Guj)353; [1999]240ITR628(Guj)
B.B. Nayak, Adv. for Manish R. Bhatt
B.C. Patel, J. 1. The petitioner has approached this Court by invoking Art. 226 of the Constitution of India challenging notice dt. 28th August, 1995, Annexure 'A', issued by the respondent under s. 148 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshwIn Vanaspati Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Gujarat
Jan-25-2002
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 43(1)
[2002]255ITR26(Guj)
B.B. Nayak, Adv. for; Manish R. Bhatt, Adv.
D.A. Mehta, J.1. The applicant-assessee had proposed the following four questions of law under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSadhuram Gordhandas Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Gujarat
Sep-14-2001
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3) and 147
(2002)172CTR(Guj)201; [2002]253ITR695(Guj)
B.B. Nayak, Adv. for Manish R. Bhatt, Adv.
D.A. Mehta, J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'B', has referred the following six questions for the opinion of this court in compliance with the directions issued by this court under Section 256(2) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUsha Fertilizers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Gujarat
Aug-29-2002
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1)
[2004]269ITR591(Guj)
B.B. Nayak, Adv. for; Manish R. Bhatt, Adv.
D. A. Mehta, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'A', has referred the following question :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNavjivan Oil Mills Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Gujarat
Jul-19-2001
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143, 144, 145, 147 and 271(1)
[2001]252ITR417(Guj)
B.B. Nayak, Adv. for R.P. Bhatt, Adv.
D.A. Mehta, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench,'B', has referred the following two questions for the opinion of this court :'(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, theTribunal was justified...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Electric Control Gear Ltd.
Gujarat
Nov-21-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]129TAXMAN722(Guj)
A.R. Dave, J.At the instance of the revenue, the following questions have been referred to this court for its opinion by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench' B under the provisions of section 256(1) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »