Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: b n srikrishna · Page 1 of about 458 results (0.080 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 15 2002

Escotal Mobile Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-15-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]123TAXMAN134(Ker)

B.N. Srikrishna, C.J.These writ petitions under article 226 of the Constitution impugn the levy of service tax on the taxable service provided by cellular telephone service providers.O.P. No. 4973 of 2001 :2. The petitioner is engaged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2009

R.S. Sodhi and anr. and Vs. Partha Pratim Saikia

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-03-2009

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2009]151CompCas583(Gauhati)

I.A. Ansari, J.1. By this common judgment and order, I propose to dispose of both these criminal petitions inasmuch as both these petitions have arisen out of the same order, which stands impugned in these criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2022

Reliance Industries Limited Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-05-2022

Subject : MRTP

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1167 of 2022 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) No.3417/2022]. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED … APPELLANT VERSUS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS. …...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 26 2018

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2018

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dwivedi

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.494 OF2012JUSTICE K.S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) WITH TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.151 OF2013TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2009

Shradhanand Anathalaya thro' Its Secretary Vs. Asha Bhojraj Shende and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-26-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 30 and 44; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 25F, 25G and 44; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 8, Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : (2009)IVLLJ101Bom

Advocate for Respondent : Y.D. Shukla, Adv., ;A.R. Taiwade and ;T.D. Khade, A.G.Ps.

J.H. Bhatia, J.1. All these petitions may be disposed of by common judgment as the common question of law and facts are involved though the dates of appointments of the respondent No. 1 in each of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1999

B.J. Shetty and Others Vs. Air India Limited and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-14-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 9-A and 33(1); Air Corporations (Transfer of Undertakings and Repeal) Act, 1994 - Sections 4 and 8; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 226 and 311(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617

Reported in : 1999(4)ALLMR559; 2000(1)BomCR743; 2000(4)MhLj274

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Andhyarujina, ;S.C., ;E.P. Bharucha, ;S.K. Talsania and ;Z.S. Kamdin, Advs. i/b ;Mulla & ;Mulla & ;Craigie Blunt & ;Caroe

ORDERB.N. Srikrishna, J.1. Rules issued returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service through their respective Counsel. By consent, rules called out and heard finally.2. These three writ petitions, though marginally variant on facts, arise out of the same...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1992

Sharad R. Khanna and ors. Vs. Industrial Credit and Investment Corp. o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1992

Subject : Contract

Acts : Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 2, 9(2), 9(5) and 12(2); Presidency Towns Insolvency (Amendment) Act, 1978; Bombay Insolvency Rules, 1910 - Rule 52B(5); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 132 and 140

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR546

Advocate for Respondent : J.I. Mehta and ;Y.B. Pandya, Advs., i/b., ;Pandya & Poonawala

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. By this Notice of Motion, the judgment debtor is seeking to set aside the Insolvency Notice No. N/108 of 1991 dated 27th August, 1991. The judgment debtors had impugned the validity of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2000

Shramik Utkarsha Sabha Vs. Afcons Infrastructure Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-23-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : [2001(89)FLR124]; (2001)ILLJ654Bom

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Singhvi and ;Sushil Mahadeswar, Advs. i/b., P.K. Singhvi, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and ;P.K. Rele and ;Panna Mehta, Advs. for Respondent No. 1

B.N. Srikrishna & Ranjana Desai, JJ. 1. We have perused the record and heard Mr. Cama, learned counsel for the appellant atgreat length. 2. The order passed by the learned single Judge, which affirms the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2000

Viral Filaments Limited Vs. Indusind Bank Limited

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-01-2000

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 434(1), 442, 446, 446(1), (2) and (3), 529, 529-A, 529 (1) and (2), 530, 537; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8; Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 19(2) and 19, 22, 25 and 34(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 73

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR737; [2003]113CompCas85(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pravin Samdani, ;Mr. Prateek Seksaria, ;Mr. Simil Purohit and ;Mrs. Kiran Shah, Advs., ;i/b., Ashar and Co.

ORDERB.N. Srikrishna, J. 1. Appeal admitted. Respondent waives service through their Counsel. By consent. Appeal called out and heard.2. This Appeal under the Letters Patent impugns an order of the learned Company Judge dated November 23,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1992

Bombay Dyeing and Mfg. Co. Ltd. and Others Vs. Aditya Narayan Shyam Ch ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-26-1992

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1993(64)ELT201(Bom); (1993)ILLJ839Bom

Advocate for Respondent : N.M. Ganguli, Adv.

1. Rule. Respondent No. 1 waives service. By consent rule is made returnable forthwith.Heard parties. 2. The present petition is filed by the management seeking to impugned an order passed by the Industrial Court on October...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial