Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: b n sen · Page 1 of about 58 results (0.135 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 19 1966

Mica Export Promotion Council and ors. Vs. G.C.L. Joneja and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-19-1966

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Section 256

Reported in : [1968]38CompCas371(Cal),72CWN117

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Sen and ;B.N. Sen, Advs.

A.N. Sen, J.1. Mica Export Promotion Council is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. Disputes have arisen with regard to the election of the committee members of the said company. The petitioners in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 1966

Arun Kumar Bhattacharjee and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-19-1966

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 166(3), 226 and 311(2)

Reported in : AIR1968Cal35,(1969)ILLJ45Cal

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen, Adv. for Respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 11

ORDERB.C. Mitra, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution, in which the petitioners claim a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 12 to forbear from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1977

Puspabala Ray Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-06-1977

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 25 and 29

Reported in : AIR1978Cal221

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen, Adv.

ORDERManjula Bose, J. 1. One Radheshyam Roy, since deceased instituted this suit on Sept. 19, 1956 against the defendant Life Insurance Corporation of India for recovery of a sum of Rs. 26,000/- alleged to be due...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 14 1965

S.P. Consolidated Engineering Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) an ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-14-1965

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 299 and 300; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 5 and 7; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20, 20(2), 26 and 80 - Order 6; ;Calcutta High Court Rules - Rule 20; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 20

Reported in : AIR1966Cal259; MANU/WB/0060/1966

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen, Adv.

P.C. Mallick, J.1. This is an application under Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act for filing an arbitration agreement. The arbitration agreement is a clause in the contract subsisting between the parties. The petitioner is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 1990

Shri Amrit Lal Basumatari, Recrimination Vs. Shri Abdul Muhib Mazumdar ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-09-1990

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 87, 97(1), 100 and 101(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 8, Rule 6A

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen, M.K. Sharma, S.S. Dey, K.P. Pathak, M. Nath, N. Saikia, S.A. Laskar and A.B. Chaudhury, Advs.

Manisana, J. 1. In election petition No. 23 of 1989, the election petitioner has claimed two reliefs, one under Section 100 for declaration that the election of the respondent-2 Sri Basumatary, the returned candidate, is void,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1982

Ritu Sachdev Vs. Anita Jindal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-25-1982

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1982Cal329

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen, Adv.

B.N. Pyne, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 19th Feb., 1980 of Mrs. P. Khastgir, J, dismissing the appellant's application made in the court of the first instance for amendment of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1961

Harbans Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-09-1961

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 20, 31, 31(4) and 34

Reported in : AIR1961Cal659,65CWN913

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen, Adv.

ORDERP.C. Mallick, J. 1. This is an application to supersede an arbitration agreement, to revoke the authority of the arbitrator and to vacate an order for stay of the suit instituted by the plaintiff in this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1982

Bijoli Grill Spencer's Product Vs. Spencers and Co. Ltd. and Anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-21-1982

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 27, 33 and 34

Reported in : AIR1983Cal175

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen, Adv.

ORDERPadma Khastgir, J. 1. This application has been taken out by Bijoli Gril Spencer's Product, a firm, against Spencers & Co. Ltd. and Spencer Acrated Water Factory Pvt. Ltd. (in Liquidation) for an order of injunction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1965

Amritraj Kothari Vs. Golecha Financiers

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-18-1965

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34 and 41 - Schedule - Rule 4; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 12, Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1966Cal315

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen, Adv.

ORDERP.C. Mallick, J.1. This is an application for stay of a suit under Section 34 of the Indian Arbitration Act. It is not disputed that the disputes in suit are covered by the arbitration clause in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1962

Mrs. Maniluxmi Patel and anr. Vs. Hindusthan Co-operative Insurance So ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-30-1962

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; ;Limitation Act - Section 19 - Article 86; ;Life Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 4; ;Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - Section 7(1); ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 229

Reported in : AIR1962Cal625,66CWN774

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen and ;M. Banerji, Advs.

S.P. Mitra, J.1. This is a suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 10,000/- and for other reliefs. The plaintiffs' case is that the defendant No. 1 namely, the Hindusthan Co-operative Insurance Society Limited...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial