Advanced Search Results
international Security and Intelligence Agency Limited. Vs. Municipal ...
Delhi
Jan-17-2001
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17, 20, 30, 32, 33 and 37 (1); Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 5, 43, 202 and 476 - Schedule - Articles 119, 137 and 158; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21; Telegraph Act, 1885
2001IIIAD(Delhi)87; AIR2001Delhi283a; 90(2001)DLT243; 2000(57)DRJ582; 2001(3)RLR25
Dr. K.S. Sidhu, Sr. Adv. ; with Mr. Apurb Lal, Adv.
ORDERVIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1. Suit No. 569-A of 1997 has been filed for making the Award relating to case No. ARB/JC/1 dated 14th March, 1997, passed by Justice Jagdish Chandra (Retd.) as Rule of the Court and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStick Travels (P) Ltd. Vs. Ethiopian Airlines
Delhi
Nov-13-2000
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 10
2001(58)DRJ119
Y.P. Narula and ; V. Seshagiri, Advs.
Vikramajit Sen, J.1. The controversy that has arisen in this present dispute centres upon the interpretation that is to be given to Section 10 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Ethiopian Airlines had appointed Messers Stic Travels...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanai Lal Dwary Vs. the State
Kolkata
Feb-20-1950
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164 and 297; ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 24 and 145
AIR1950Cal413
B.M. Sen, Adv.
Harries, C.J.1. This is an appeal by one Kanai Lal Dwary who was tried by a learned Assistant Sessions Judge and jury upon a charge of dacoity. The jury unanimously found the appellant guilty Under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hari Narayan Das and ors. Vs. the State
Kolkata
Feb-22-1952
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 253, 436 and 439
AIR1953Cal496,57CWN68
B.M. Sen, Adv.
ORDERGuha, J.1. The petitioners were summoned under Section 411, Penal Code, to take their trial. It appears that the case dragged on for a very considerable period mainly owing to the complainant not offering himself for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohinder Pal Mohindra Vs. Delhi Administration and anr.
Delhi
Jan-19-1988
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(1)
AIR1989Delhi270; 1989(1)ARBLR326(Delhi); 37(1989)DLT345; 1989(16)DRJ244; 1989RLR139
P.K. Bahri, J.(1) These two petitions are being disposed of by this order. Facts, in brief, are that a contract was entered into between Delhi Administration and Mohinder Pal by virtue of the which the work...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of West Bengal Vs. A.K. Ghosh and Bros
Kolkata
Feb-11-1975
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 21, 30 and 34; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115
AIR1975Cal227,79CWN349
Amiya Bose, ;Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Monisa Mitter, Advs.
M.M. Dutt, J. 1. This appeal is at the instance of the State of West Bengal and it arises out of a suit instituted by the respondent for recovery of money.2. The respondent entered into a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. B.M. Sen
Kolkata
Feb-10-1961
ArbitrationContract
Constitution of India - Article 299(1); ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 33
AIR1963Cal456
Arun Mukherjee, Adv.
ORDERP.C. Mallick, J.1. This is an application challenging the existence and validity of an arbitration agreement and an award made thereunder.2. The Respondent is a Contractor who was entrusted with certain construction works to be done...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›