Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: b m sen · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.101 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 17 2001

international Security and Intelligence Agency Limited. Vs. Municipal ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-17-2001

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17, 20, 30, 32, 33 and 37 (1); Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 5, 43, 202 and 476 - Schedule - Articles 119, 137 and 158; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21; Telegraph Act, 1885

Reported in : 2001IIIAD(Delhi)87; AIR2001Delhi283a; 90(2001)DLT243; 2000(57)DRJ582; 2001(3)RLR25

Advocate for Respondent : Dr. K.S. Sidhu, Sr. Adv. ; with Mr. Apurb Lal, Adv.

ORDERVIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1. Suit No. 569-A of 1997 has been filed for making the Award relating to case No. ARB/JC/1 dated 14th March, 1997, passed by Justice Jagdish Chandra (Retd.) as Rule of the Court and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2000

Stick Travels (P) Ltd. Vs. Ethiopian Airlines

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2000

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 10

Reported in : 2001(58)DRJ119

Advocate for Respondent : Y.P. Narula and ; V. Seshagiri, Advs.

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. The controversy that has arisen in this present dispute centres upon the interpretation that is to be given to Section 10 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Ethiopian Airlines had appointed Messers Stic Travels...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1950

Kanai Lal Dwary Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-20-1950

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164 and 297; ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 24 and 145

Reported in : AIR1950Cal413

Advocate for Respondent : B.M. Sen, Adv.

Harries, C.J.1. This is an appeal by one Kanai Lal Dwary who was tried by a learned Assistant Sessions Judge and jury upon a charge of dacoity. The jury unanimously found the appellant guilty Under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 22 1952

Hari Narayan Das and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-22-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 253, 436 and 439

Reported in : AIR1953Cal496,57CWN68

Advocate for Respondent : B.M. Sen, Adv.

ORDERGuha, J.1. The petitioners were summoned under Section 411, Penal Code, to take their trial. It appears that the case dragged on for a very considerable period mainly owing to the complainant not offering himself for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 1988

Mohinder Pal Mohindra Vs. Delhi Administration and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-19-1988

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(1)

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi270; 1989(1)ARBLR326(Delhi); 37(1989)DLT345; 1989(16)DRJ244; 1989RLR139

P.K. Bahri, J.(1) These two petitions are being disposed of by this order. Facts, in brief, are that a contract was entered into between Delhi Administration and Mohinder Pal by virtue of the which the work...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1975

State of West Bengal Vs. A.K. Ghosh and Bros

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-11-1975

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 21, 30 and 34; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1975Cal227,79CWN349

Advocate for Respondent : Amiya Bose, ;Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Monisa Mitter, Advs.

M.M. Dutt, J. 1. This appeal is at the instance of the State of West Bengal and it arises out of a suit instituted by the respondent for recovery of money.2. The respondent entered into a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1961

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. B.M. Sen

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-10-1961

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299(1); ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 33

Reported in : AIR1963Cal456

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Mukherjee, Adv.

ORDERP.C. Mallick, J.1. This is an application challenging the existence and validity of an arbitration agreement and an award made thereunder.2. The Respondent is a Contractor who was entrusted with certain construction works to be done...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial