Advanced Search Results
M.J. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and an ...
Mumbai
Oct-17-2007
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 115JB, 115JB(2), 143(3), 147, 148 and 151(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
(2008)216CTR(Bom)130; [2008]297ITR119(Bom)
B.M. Chatterji, ;P.P. Bhosale and ;P.S. Sahadevan, Advs.
J.P. Devadhar, J.1. Heard. Rule. Rule, returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing.2. This petition is filed to challenge the notice dated December 27, 2006 issued under Section 148...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAllana Cold Storage Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-25-2006
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(2), 143(3) and 148
(2006)206CTR(Bom)401; [2006]287ITR1(Bom)
B.M. Chatterji, Adv.
1. All these four petitions are filed by companies which are sister concerns. They are all about the assessment orders passed by the first respondent-Income-tax Officer for the assessment year 2001-02. Rule on petitions. Reply has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Hassan Ali Khan Vs. Settlement Commission,
Mumbai
Jan-28-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act - Sections 245(1), 245C, 245BA(5A), 245D(1), 245D(2C), 245D, 245D(4), 245D(2B), 245I, 245J and 245L; Wealth Tax Act; Finance Act, 2007; Constitution of India - Article 255
(2008)217CTR(Bom)163; [2008]299ITR127(Bom)
B.M. Chatterji, ;P.P. Bhosale and ;P.S. Sahadevan, Advs. in Writ Petition Nos. 2422 and 2423 of 2007
F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule in all the Petitions. By consent, heard forthwith.2. All these petitions have been disposed off by this common judgment as the facts are more or less similar as also the issue involved....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Samson John Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-29-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(47), 131, 132, 158BC, 222 and 222(1); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 53
(2008)215CTR(Bom)131; [2008]300ITR188(Bom); 2008(4)MhLj771
B.M. Chatterji and ;P.P. Bhosale, Advs.
F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule. By consent of parties heard forthwith.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the 1st respondent in taking steps to sell the land and house standing thereon which according to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCitibank N.A. Vs. S.K. Ojha and ors.
Mumbai
Feb-22-2002
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147 and 148
(2003)179CTR(Bom)124; [2002]257ITR663(Bom)
B.M. Chatterji, Adv. i/b., H.D. Rathod, Adv. for respondents Nos. 1 to 3
1. Heard both sides at length. Perused the petition, affidavit-in-reply and the rejoinder tendered today in court on behalf of the petitioner.2. The petitioner by this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStar Television News Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secr ...
Mumbai
Aug-07-2009
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245A, 245(2A), 245C, 245C(1), 245C(3), 245D, 245D(1), 245D(1A), 245D(2A), 245D(2B), 245D(2C), 245D(2D), 245D(4), 245D(4A), 245D(4A)(1), 45D(4A)(2A), 45D(4A)(2D), 245D(4A)(4), 245H, 245H(1), 245HA, 245HA(3), 245(I), 245(4), 246C, 245HA(1), 245HA(2), 245HA(3) and 254(2A); Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008 - Sections 273AA, 273AA(1), 273AA(3), 278AB, 278AB(1) and 278AB(3); Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, 1975; Wealth-tax Act; Right to Information Act (RTI); Central Excise Act - Sections 35C(2A); Income Tax Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Indian Penal Code
2009(111)BomLR3617; (2009)225CTR(Bom)140; [2009]317ITR66(Bom); [2009]184TAXMAN400(Bom)
B.M. Chatterji, ;Abhay Ahuja, ;R. Ashokan, ;N.R. Prajapati, ;A.S. Shivsharan, ;Anamica Malhotra and ;P.S. Sahadevan, Advs.
Ferdino I. Rebello, J.1. The petitioner herein is a non-resident company. They filed an application before the Income Tax Settlement Commission on 5th March, 2007 under Section 246-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter shall...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaji N. Abdulla Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-08-2007
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 44AE, 132, 148, 245C, 245C(1), 245D(1), 249 and 249(4)
(2008)214CTR(Bom)471; 2009(235)ELT609(Bom); [2008]299ITR119(Bom); 2008(2)MhLj614
B.M. Chatterji, ;P.P. Bhosale and ;P.S. Sahadevan, Advs.
F.I. Rebello, J.1 Rule. Heard forthwith.The petitioner an individual has filed his returns of income for the 'asst. yrs. 1995-96 to 2000-01 with the ITO, Ward 2, Udupi. The petitioner also filed regular returns of income...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsteroids Trading and Investments P. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of I ...
Mumbai
Jul-10-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80M, 143(3), 147, 148, 154, 254(2) and 263; Evidence Act - Sections 114
(2009)223CTR(Bom)144; [2009]308ITR190(Bom)
B.M. Chatterji and ;P.P. Bhosale, Advs.
1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. The petitioner is a company engaged in the business of trading and investments. The petitioner is regularly assessed to income-tax. This petition relates to the assessment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsian Paints Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-10-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(1), 143(3), 147 and 148; Companies Act, 1956; Evidence Act - Sections 114
(2009)223CTR(Bom)141; [2009]308ITR195(Bom)
B.M. Chatterji and ;P.P. Bhosale, Advs.
1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. The petitioner by this petition challenges the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as also the order dated May 14, 2008, rejecting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDiamond Services International (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...
Mumbai
Dec-12-2007
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 44BB, 195, 195(3) and 197(1)
(2008)216CTR(Bom)120; [2008]304ITR201(Bom)
B.M. Chatterji, ;P.P. Bhosale and ;P.S. Sahadevan, Advs.
F.I. Rebello, J.1. The petitioner is a company incorporated in Singapore and is also a tax resident of Singapore. The tax residency certificate of the petitioner has been issued by the Singapore tax authorities. The petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »