Advanced Search Results

Shyam Swarup Saksena Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6 and 9; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act

Reported in : AIR1963All426

Advocate for Respondent : P.L. Kaul, Adv.

ORDERN.U. Beg, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed by Shyam Swamp Saksena praying that a writ of mandamus, certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction may be Issued restraining opposite parties Nos. 1...

Ram Prakash and Bros. and ors. Vs. Nagar Mahapalika and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ753

ORDERS.C. Mathur, J.1. Ram Prakash and brothers through Sri Ram Prakash had directed this application under S- 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the Nagar Mahapalika, Lucknow and six of its officials viz....

Anwarul Hasan Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 297 and 423

Reported in : AIR1953All142

Advocate for Respondent : S.L. Suri, Adv. for ;Addl. Govt. Adv.

Malik, C.J. 1. The appellant Anwarul Hasan has been convicted under Section 408, Penal Code under two out of three counts and has been sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/-...

Ahibaran Singh and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 411; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 101 to 103; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 32

Reported in : AIR1953All493

Advocate for Respondent : B.L. Kaul, Adv. for ;Deputy Govt. Adv.

ORDERKaul, J.1. Ahibaran Singh and Gokaran were convicted by a Magistrate of the first Class, Hardoi, under Section 411, Penal Code, and sentenced to nine months' rigorous imprisonment each. An appeal preferred by them was dismissed...

Badri Prasad and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 21(9) and 353

Reported in : AIR1953All494

Advocate for Respondent : B.L. Kaul, Adv. for ;Deputy Govt. Adv.

ORDERKaul, J.1. Badri Prasad, Gur Prasad, Jagannath, Ram Prasad, Ram Singh and Mohammad Yakub were convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, Rae Bareili, for offence under Sections 147, 341/149 and 353/149, Penal Code. Under Section 147 they...

Tittar and anr. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 103 and 439

Reported in : AIR1953All506

Advocate for Respondent : B.L. Kaul, Deputy Govt. Adv.

ORDERKaul, J.1. Tittar Khatik and his son, Bhajan were convicted under Section 60 (b), U. P. Excise Act, and sentenced to six months' rigorous imprisonment. They preferred an appeal, which was unsuccessful. They have now come...

Dalip Chand and ors. Vs. the Mukhya Nagar Adhikari and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 298 and 298(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Uttar Pradesh Nagar Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959 - Sections 541, 577 and 581

Reported in : AIR1964All46

Advocate for Respondent : B.L. Kaul, Adv.

Jagadish Sahai, J.1. Dalip Chand and Ramdin have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on the following allegations.2. Dalip Chand was the owner of a rickshaw the number of which is...

Rahas Behari Panday Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 161

Reported in : AIR1955All75; 1955CriLJ246

Advocate for Respondent : B.L. Kaul, Adv. for ;Addl. Govt. Adv.

Randhir Singh, J.1. The appellant in this case has been convicted under Section 161, I. P. C. and has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period or one year and six months and a fine...

Sardar Iqbal Singh and ors. Vs. the Municipal Board, Lucknow

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 298(1), 298(2) and 301; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(6) and 226

Reported in : AIR1959All186

Advocate for Respondent : Iqbal Ahmad and ;B.L. Kaul, Advs.

O.H. Mootham, C.J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioners, who are five in number own between them a considerable number of rickshaws which they want to ply for hire within...

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Sat NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 6, 6(1) and 7(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 9 and 9(2); Constitution of India - Article 245; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1959All218; 1959CriLJ409

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Gupta, Adv. (for Nos. 4 and 5), ;Shankar Sharma, Adv. (for Nos. 6, 8 and 9), ;B.L. Kaul, Adv. (for No. 7) and ;R.S. Mathur, Adv. (for Nos. 12 and 13)

B. Mukerji, J. 1. This petition in revision has been directed against an order made by Sri A. C. Bansal, Civil and Sessions Judge of Lucknow, who was appointed a special Judge under the Criminal Law...