Advanced Search Results
Sri Ramachandra Mardaray Deo Vs. Bhalu Patnaik and ors.
Orissa
Jan-18-1950
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 182 and 182(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 7; Consolidating Act
AIR1950Ori125
R.N. Sinha, ;B.K. Pal, ;S.K. Ray and ;B.M. Patnaik, Advs.
Narasimham, J.1. These six revision petitions are against the order of the District Munsif of Aaka rejecting six execution petitions Nos.269, 271, 272, 273, 276 and 277 of 1944 on the ground that they were barred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSheikh Makbul Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Orissa
Oct-30-1959
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72 and 74C; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 14, Rule 1; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 3
AIR1960Ori146
B.K. Pal, Adv.
S. Barman, J.1. This is plaintiff's second appeal from a reversing decision of the learned Subordinate Judge, Balasore in Appeal No. 8 of 1956, whereby he set aside the decision of the learned Munsif and dismissed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. R.N. Gupta
Orissa
Mar-13-1963
Commercial
Court-fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Article 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 6
AIR1963Ori174
B.K. Pal and ;K.N. Sharma, Advs.
Barman, J.1. Defendant is the appellant. This appeal arises out of a rice supplying contractor's suit for recovery of Rs. 36,854/3/- consisting of four several sums, namely Rs. 10,322/8/- as loss alleged to have been suffered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.A. Jayalakshmi Vs. H. Saradha and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-21-2009
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 8, Rule 9
JT2009(13)SC428; (2009)6MLJ1138(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)556
B.K. Pal, ; T.S. Shanthi and ; V. Balachandran, Advs.
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Distinction between Order VIII Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Order VI Rule 17 thereof is the question involved in this appeal. It arises out of a judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnandalal, Proprietor of Laxmichanda Sitaram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...
Orissa
Apr-12-1960
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 - Schedule - Article 31
AIR1961Ori108
B.K. Pal, Adv.
S. Barman, J.1. In this second appeal the plaintiff,--a claimant against the Railways for short delivery of goods,--is the appellant from a reversing decision of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuttack, whereby he reversed a decision...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNetramani Debi Vs. Lakhminarayan Kar and ors.
Orissa
Feb-02-1959
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 6 and 7 - Article 118
AIR1959Ori179
B.K. Pal, Adv.
Rao, J. 1. Plaintiff files this appeal against the confirming judgment of Sri T. V. Rao, Additional District Judge of Puri dismissing her suit for a declaration that the adoption of defendant No. 1 was not...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKshetromoni Panda and anr. Vs. Raghunath Patnaik and ors.
Orissa
Jan-20-1953
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145
AIR1953Ori255; 19(1953)CLT139
B.K. Pal, Adv.
Mohapatra, J.1. This is a revision against an order of Sri R. N. Dhal Samanta, Magistrate,Ghumsur Russelkonda, dated 30-5-51, passed under 145, Criminal P. C., confirming the possession of the members of the 1st party. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Balu
Supreme Court of India
Nov-05-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 377(3); Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR2005SC222; 2005CriLJ335; [2005(1)JCR153(SC)]; JT2004(10)SC461; 2004(9)SCALE378; (2005)1SCC108; 2005(1)LC161(SC)
B.K. Pal, Adv.
N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted. 3. The State of Madhya Pradesh has preferred this appeal for enhancement of sentence awarded by the High Court of Judicature at Madhya Pradesh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanyaka Parmeswari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Orissa
Sep-23-1959
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 47(1) and 72; General Acceptance, Carriage and Delivery of Goods Rules - Rule 31 and 31(2); Evidence Act - Sections 106 and 114
AIR1960Ori103
B.K. Pal, Adv.
S. Barman, J.1. The plaintiff is the petitioner in this civil revision directed against the judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Berhampur, exercising S.C.C. powers dismissing the suil against the defendant No. 1 and ex parte...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanyaka Parameswari Cloth Stores Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Orissa
Dec-24-1959
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77 and 80
AIR1960Ori154
B.K. Pal, Adv.
ORDERS. Barman, J.1. The plaintiff is the petitioner in this Civil Revision against an order of the learned Small Cause Court Judge, Berhampur in S.C.C. Suit No. 257 of 1956 whereby he dismissed the plaintiffs' suit.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »