Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: b k bhargava · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.134 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 10 1962

The Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Firm LaxminaraIn Harnarain

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-10-1962

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 23(1); Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72 and 74C; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152, 160 and 161; Booking of Goods Traffic Rules - Rules 32, 45 and 47

Reported in : AIR1963Raj162

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Bhargava and; B.K. Acharya, Advs.

Chhangani, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendants Union of India through the General Manager, Northern and Western Railways, against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Alwar, dated the 4th July, 1955, decreeing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1961

Dr. Ram Kumar Vs. Mahadeo Lal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-22-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 38, 47, 148, 151 and 152 - Order 20, Rule 3 - Order 47

Reported in : AIR1962Raj54

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Dutt, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

Jagat Narayan, J.1. This is a judgment-debtor's execution second appeal against an appellate order of the District Judge- Jhunjhunu.2. The facts which have given rise to it are these. Mahadeo Lal respondent No. 1 brought a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1952

Mst. Gulab Bai and anr. Vs. Mt. Manphool Bai

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-19-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 133(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 109

Reported in : AIR1953Raj42

Advocate for Respondent : M.B. Bhargava and; B.K. Bhargava, Advs.

Wanchoo, C.J. 1. The following two questions have been referred to this Full Bench for decision--1. Whether in a case which involves a question of great public or private importance certificate for leave to appeal under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 12 1955

Hakim MartIn De Silva Vs. MartIn De Silva Ii and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-12-1955

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 8 - Schedule - Article 17; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 30 and 54; Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 30 and 54

Reported in : AIR1957Raj275

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Saksena and; B.K. Bhargava, Advs.

Bapna, J. 1. The present matter relates to the determination of proper court-fees in an appeal under section 54 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition. Act from the decision of the District Judge, Jaipur City, on a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 1951

Kashi Prasad Vs. Padamjit Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-09-1951

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Debt Law; Uttar Pradesh Eucumbered Estates Act, 1934 - Sections 2, 7(3), 11 and 44(2)

Reported in : AIR1953All557

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Bhargava, Adv. for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2

Ghulam Hasan, J. 1. This appeal by the decree-holder has arisen in the following circumstances 2. In 1943 Raja Sir Daljit Slngh, the father and grand-father of the respondents 1 and 2 respectively entered into an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1956

State Vs. Babulal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-17-1956

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 212A, 246, 372, 372(1) and 385; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 46; Rajasthan Adaptation of Central Laws Ordinance, 1950 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1957Raj28; 1956CriLJ550

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Bhargava, Adv.

Wanchoo, C.J. 1. This is a reference by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Fatehpur under Section 432, Criminal P. C. The question raised before him was that the Police Act (5 of 1861) was not legally enforced...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1950

Dwarka Prasad Vs. Gopi Nath and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-19-1950

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 1 - Order 34, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1952Raj69

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Bhargava, Adv.

Sharma, J.1. This is one of the defendants appeal and arises out of a suit for redemption, filed by the plaintiff respondents against the defendant appellants in the Court of the Munsiff, Bharatpur.2. It was alleged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1984

Rameshwar Prasad Srivastava Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-21-1984

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1984CriLJ996

ORDERN.N. Sharma, J.1. This revision is directed against order dated 25.11.1981 by Shri J.P. Singh, learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Varanasi in Criminal Appeal No. 265 of 1981 by which conviction of revisionist under Sections 325,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1990

N.A. Palkhivala and anr. Vs. Madhya Pradesh Pradushan Niwaran Mandal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-16-1990

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981- Sections 4, 21, 37, 39 and 40; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10, 40, 175, 252, 291 and 292; Iron and Steel Control Order, 1956; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 47, 47(1) and 47(2); Essential Commodities Act - Sections 3, 7, 10 and 40; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1856

Advocate for Respondent : M.V. Tamaskar, Adv. General

ORDERGulab C. Gupta, J. 1. This is an application under Section 482, Cr. P.C. invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court to quash criminal proceedings against the petitioners in Criminal Case No. 2820/1986 pending in the Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1978

Munir Ahmed and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-24-1978

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)103

K.D. Sharma, J.1. This appeal by Munir Ahmed, Pir Box, Bashir Khan, Hanif Khan, Bhanwaru Khan, Ghand Khan, Yusuf Khan and Mst. Patasi is directed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Churu, dated 27th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial