Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: b k bachawat · Page 1 of about 35 results (0.046 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 28 2004

Pradip Kumar Dasgupta Vs. Official Liquidator, High Court and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-28-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 2004(4)CHN185,[2005]124CompCas168(Cal),[2005]58SCL194(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Bachawat, ;Mukti Chandra Ghosh, ;Bidyut Dutt and ;Mithua Sen, Advs.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. Since all the applications involve identical questions of fact and law those are disposed of by this common judgment.2. The Golden Biscuit Company Pvt. Ltd. in liquidation (hereinafter referred to as the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1990

Maddi Lakshmaiah and ors. Vs. Duncan Agro Industries Limited and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-13-1990

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 392, 392(1), 392(2) and 433

Reported in : (1991)2CALLT309(HC),95CWN720

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Bachawat, ;Pratap Chatterjee and ;R.P. Mookherjee, Advs.

Prabir Kumar Majumdar, J.1. By this Judge's summon the petitioners Maddi Lakshmaiah, Maddi Lakshmaiah & Co. Pvt. Ltd. and Maddi Lakshmaiah Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. seek, inter alia, appropriate direction against Duncan Agro Industries Ltd. to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1972

In Re: Prafulla Chandra Mitra

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-13-1972

Subject : Civil

Acts : Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Section 21; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 41

Reported in : AIR1973Cal99

Advocate for Respondent : Ahin Chowdhury and ;Gopal, Advs., Law led by S.K. Acharya, Adv.

ORDERHazra, J.1. The insolvent, in this case is one Prafulla Chandra Mitra. An order of adjudication was passed on February 16, 1971 by this Court on his own application. This application is made by thedecree-holder M/s....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 09 1999

Hindustan Copper Ltd. Vs. Rana Builders Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-09-1999

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Order 8, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1999Cal229,(1999)2CALLT95(HC),[2001]103CompCas702(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anindya Kumar Mitra, Adv.

M.H.S. Ansari. J. 1. The appellant herein was the respondent in an application being A.P. No.8 of 1998 filed by the respondent herein under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying for an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 1974

Mackinnon Mackenzie and Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Anil Kumar Sen and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-07-1974

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rules 2 and 3; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 6 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21, Rule 46C

Reported in : AIR1975Cal150,78CWN860

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghose, Adv.

B.C. Mitra, J.1. This appeal is directed against an order dated February 20, 1974, whereby the appellant was directed to pay to the Sheriff of Calcutta a sum of Rs. 1,40,873.15 attached in its hands by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1978

Eastern India Motion Pictures and ors. Vs. Performing Right Society Lt ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-25-1978

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 14(1), 17 and 35

Reported in : AIR1978Cal477

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Sen, Adv.

B.C. Basak, J.1. This appeal under Section 72 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) is directed against an order of the Copyright Board constituted under the said Act (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1973

United Bank of India Ltd. Vs. United India Credit and Development Comp ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-18-1973

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 53(3), 173, 372, 372(13), 372(14), 391, 392, 393 and 394; ;Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Section 6; ;Banking Regulation Act, 1949; ;Enemy Properties Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 7(3) and 8(1)

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas689(Cal)

Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Sections 391, 392, 393 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, for sanction of a scheme of amalgamation and other consequential orders and directions.2. The facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1982

Bijoli Grill Spencer's Product Vs. Spencers and Co. Ltd. and Anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-21-1982

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 27, 33 and 34

Reported in : AIR1983Cal175

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen, Adv.

ORDERPadma Khastgir, J. 1. This application has been taken out by Bijoli Gril Spencer's Product, a firm, against Spencers & Co. Ltd. and Spencer Acrated Water Factory Pvt. Ltd. (in Liquidation) for an order of injunction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 1981

Konsumex Vs. Anand and Co. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-10-1981

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 - Schedule - Article 3 - Rule 6; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1981Cal298

Advocate for Respondent : Sankar Mitra, Adv. for Defendant No. 3

ORDERDipak Kumar Sen, J. 1. The dispute in this case arises out of shipment of several consignments of men's under-garments by Anand & Co., the defendant No, 1, to Konsu-mex, the plaintiff, a company. 2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1977

Bejoy K. Swaika Vs. Shyam Sunder Swaika and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-25-1977

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39 and 41

Reported in : AIR1977Cal455

Advocate for Respondent : Saraf, Adv.

Hazra, J. 1. This is a petition for an order that fa) leave be given to the petitioner to file the Memorandum of Appeal on his undertaking (i) to have the order dated Apr. 22, 1977...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial