Advanced Search Results

The Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Firm LaxminaraIn Harnarain

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 23(1); Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72 and 74C; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152, 160 and 161; Booking of Goods Traffic Rules - Rules 32, 45 and 47

Reported in : AIR1963Raj162

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Bhargava and; B.K. Acharya, Advs.

Chhangani, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendants Union of India through the General Manager, Northern and Western Railways, against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Alwar, dated the 4th July, 1955, decreeing...

Leima Singh Choudhury and ors. Vs. Tarini Mohan Das and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Sarma Barua, N. Rajkhowa and J.K. Parajuli, Advs.

P.P. Naolekar, C.J. 1. The plaintiffs-respondents had filed a suit for possession of the suit land described in the schedule of the plaint under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. According to the plaintiffs-respondents, their...

Himangshu Sekhar Chakravorty Vs. Tax Recovery Commissioner and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 46; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 224; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : B.P. Saraf, Adv.

K. Lahiri, J. 1. The following core questions have been propounded in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution : '(i) Whether on withdrawal or cancellation of the recovery certificate by the Income-tax Officer under...

Rameshwarlal and ors. Vs. the Pareek Commercial Bank Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 45B and 45T; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 58

Reported in : AIR1970Raj12; [1971]41CompCas635(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : C.D. Mundhra, Adv.

ORDERP.N. Shinghal, J. 1. There is a great deal of controversy about the maintainability of these four applications. Common questions of law and fact arise in all of them. They have been argued together, and I...

Remeshwarlal and ors. Vs. the Pareek Com. Bank Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1968WLN47

P.N. Shinghal, J.1. There is a greal deal of controversy about the maintainability of these four applications. Common questions of law and fact arise in all of them. They have been argued together, and I shall...

Smt. Chhagani and anr. Vs. Smt. Tara Kumari and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1972WLN972

Jagat Narayan, C.J.1. This is an application by the petitioners for setting aside the order dated 23-8-71 holding that the pauper appeal stood dismissed in accordance with the order 8-7-1971.2. The petitioners filed an application for...

Chimanlal Dalchand and ors. Vs. Maharajadhiraj H.H. Shri Sumersinghji ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfar of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105, 107 and 108

Reported in : AIR1961Raj17

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Acharya Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and; Chandmal Lodha, Adv. for Respondent No.2

Sarjoo Prosad, C. J. This appeal is by defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3, and arises out of a suit for recovery of rent instituted by the plaintiff respondent No. 1 in respect of a lease...

Putto Lal Vs. His Highness Maharaja Dhiraj Sumersinghji of Kishengarh

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 107 - Order 23, Rule 3; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR1963Raj63

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Acharya, Adv.

Modi, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff Putto Lal Sharma against a judgment and decree of the Senior Civil Judge, Ajmer, dated the 21st January, 1960, by which he recorded a compromise alleged to...

Kishorelal Vs. Surajmal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 96, 151 and 152 - Order 7, Rules 11 and 13 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1956Raj164

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Acharya, Adv.

Dave, J.1. This is a second appeal by the defendant in a money suit and arises in the following circumstances :2. The plaintiff-respondent Surajmal filed a money suit for Rs. 781/4/- in the court of Munsif,...

Anoop Chand Vs. Nathmal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 35 and 37; Rajasthan Stamp Rules - Rule 14; Rajasthan Court Fees - Rules 13 and 14; Suits Valuation Rules, 1961

Reported in : AIR1965Raj114

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Acharya, Adv.

ORDERJagat Narayan, J.1. This is a revision application by the defendant against an order of the Civil Judge, Bikaner, returning a promissory note to the plaintiff for getting it certified by the Collector to be duly...