Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: b h satish · Page 1 of about 41 results (0.084 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 31 1997

H.K. Shivanna Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-31-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 392

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1888

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Satish, HCGP

1. The instant appeal is filed by the accused to challenge the judgment and order of sentence dt. 25-3-91 passed by the Special Judge. Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore for the offence under Secs. 3 and 7...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1996

ismail S/O Ibrahim Saval Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-08-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 452(1) and 454

Reported in : 1997(1)ALT(Cri)523; 1997CriLJ1403; ILR1997KAR728; 1997(1)KarLJ761

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Satish, ;Govt Pleader

1. The instant appeal is filed under Section 454 Cr.P.C. to challenge the Judgment Dt- 28-3-94 in S.C. No. 75/91 in so far as the same related to an order to return a sum of Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1996

Ashok Anaraj JaIn and Another Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-25-1996

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1997CriLJ1261; ILR1996KAR1615; 1996(2)KarLJ278

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Satish, Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. The Petitioners who are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Special Case No. 7/88 on the file of the Court of the Special Judge, Bijapur have preferred this revision petition against an order dated 20-10-1990...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 25 1996

Arasappa Vs. State by Vijayanagar Police Station, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-25-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363 and 376; Evidence Act - Sections 118

Reported in : 1997CriLJ1456; ILR1997KAR283; 1997(1)KarLJ25

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Satish, HCGP

1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment dt. 16-4-91 passed by the learned XXII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore in S.C. No. 217/89, whereby the appellant herein was convicted and sentenced for an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2001

Prakash Leasing Limited Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-13-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 23, 50, 51, 51(1), 51(3) and 51(5); Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 55, 61 and 61(2); Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 - Schedule - Article 20(3); Companies Act, 1956; Karnataka Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1995

Reported in : ILR2002KAR1386; 2002(1)KarLJ517

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Satish, Government Pleader

ORDERThe Court 1. The petitioner in this petition is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and it is stated that it is engaged in non-banking financial activities like leasing, corporate financing, hire-purchase and other...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1990

Gaffarsab Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-26-1990

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2136

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Satish, High Court Pleader

ORDER1. Petitioners in these cases are residents of Ankarvalli village in Chandragutti Hobli, Sorab Taluk. Cases are registered against them for offences under sections 24, 62, 86 and 87 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1997

M.T. Joy Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-09-1997

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1445

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Satish, HCGP

ORDER1. This revision is directed against the order of the Principal Sessions Judge, Madikeri passed in Crl. A. No. 50 of 1995 dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner.2. The facts in brief are as follows...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1997

Mariswamy and Others Vs. State by the Police of Kuderu Police Station

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-25-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 142, 143, 146, 147, 149, 323, 324, 326, 329, 397, 423, 426 and 427; Constitution of India - Article 17; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1988; Untouchability Offences Act, 1955

Reported in : 2000(3)KarLJ234

Advocate for Respondent : Sri B.H. Satish, High Court Government Pleader

ORDER1. This revision is directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Mysore, convicting the accused petitioners for offences under Sections 143, 147, 323 read with Section 149,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2001

Sanjiva Matandooru Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-01-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 - Sections 2(25), 10(3), 11, 11(1) to (7), 11(9), 39, 41 and 44; Constitution of India - Article 14; Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) (Amendment) Ordinance, 1997

Reported in : ILR2001KAR4272; 2001(6)KarLJ509

Advocate for Respondent : B.H. Satish, High Court Government Pleader and ;B.G. Sridharan, Adv.

ORDERThe Court1. The petitioner is challenging the validity of Section 11(1)(ix) of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 (for short, 'the Act') to the extent of providing voting right to members nominated under this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1995

State of Karnataka Vs. D.S. Prabhakar Bhatta

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-01-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 307, 323, 324, 326, 341 and 409; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 377, 377(1) and 428

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT(Cri)457; 1996CriLJ2817; ILR1996KAR827; 1996(1)KarLJ516

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. Nagaraj, Amicus Curiae

1. This appeal is preferred under Section 377, Cr.P.C. and Section 11 of the Probation of Offenders Act questioning the legality of the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Chickmagalur dt. 2-5-90 passed in S.C. No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial