Advanced Search Results

Ramchand Sharma and ors. Vs. Collector, Customs and Central Excise and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1991(33)LC95(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. B.C. Neema

ORDERA.G. Qureshi, J.1. This is a petition filed by two petitioners jointly. Petitioner No. 1 carries on the business of stitching HDPE woven sacks and petitioner No. 2 carries on the business of printing HOPE woven...

National Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 59 and 61; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(77)ECC621; 2002(139)ELT529(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. By filing this writ under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner in substance seeks issuance of writ of mandamus claiming refund of Rs. 22,85,790/- deposited by the petitioner...

Parenteral Drugs (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2003(157)ELT5(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Standing Counsel

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J. 1. By filing this writ under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order, dated 25-9-2002 (Annexure P-9) as also the order dated 29-11-2002 (Annexure...

Siddhartha Tubes Ltd. Vs. Cegat

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2002(82)ECC44; 2002(144)ELT540(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. This writ is under Article 227 of Constitution of India. In this writ challenge is to an order dated 7-9-2002 (sic) (Annexure P/1) passed by Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Klockner Supreme Pentaplast Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G

Reported in : 2002(79)ECC437; 2002(140)ELT370(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Patil, ;Arun Mehata and ;Sunil Jain, Advs.

1. Shri B.C. Neema, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India-appellant and Shri M.H. Patil along with Shri Arun Mehata and Shri Sunil Jain, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. With consent arguments were heard on...

Omprakash Neema Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111, 123 and 135; Maintenance of Internal Security Act - Sections 7; Jail Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22 and 22(5)

Reported in : 1992(61)ELT65(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.C. Neema, ;A.H. Khan and ;Kutumbala, Advs.

A.G. Qureshi, J.1. This order shall govern the disposal of Misc. Pet. Nis. 517 of 92 (Prahlad Das Neema v. Union of India and Anr.), 621 of 92 (Ramesh Chandra Shah v. Union of India and...

Deora Wire and Wires Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1993(68)ELT771(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.C. Neema, Standing Counsel

ORDER1. Heard Shri J.P. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri B.G. Neema, learned Standing Counsel, who appears on an advance copy of the petition and LA. being supplied to him.2. A very short question...

Ramkrishna Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India Fifty-fourth Amendment Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR1994MP94; 1994(0)MPLJ180

Advocate for Respondent : B.C. Neema, Adv.

V.S. Kokje, J. 1. The petitioner, in this case, was a Judge of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh till his retirement on 20-1-1986. At the time of his retirement the salary of a Judge of...

Mardia Steel Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35 and 35F

Reported in : 1998(60)ECC31; 1998(100)ELT23(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.C. Neema, Adv.

ORDERDeepak Verma, J.1. This order shall also govern disposal of W.P. No. 20 of 1998 [ Mardia Steel Ltd., Ratlam v. The Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise Bhopal] and W.P. No. 21 of 1998 [Mardia Steel Ltd.,...

Neo Sack Ltd. Vs. Commissioner (Appeals) C. Ex.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise (Appeals) Act; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 2000(119)ELT522(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.C. Neema, Standing Counsel

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Both these petitions are being decided by a common order because these petitions are being decided strictly on question of law.2. Shri I.C. Upadhyay, counsel for petitioner. Shri B.G. Neema, standing counsel for...