Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: b b narzary · Page 1 of about 31 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 28 2001

Md. Mazibulla Mandal and ors. Vs. Md. Abbas Ali and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-28-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 107 and 115 - Order 43, Rule 1

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Narzary, Adv.

H.K.K. Singh, J. 1. Heard Mr. B.C. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. B.B. Narzary, learned counsel for the respondents.2. This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the CPC is against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1992

Gumaniram Sharma Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-21-1992

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 16 and 16(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 401

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Narzary, Public Prosecutor

D.N. Baruah, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 31-8-85 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jorhat, dismissing the Criminal Appeal No. 4(4) of 1983, affirming the judgment dated 24-9-83 passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 1991

Shri Sampatmall JaIn Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-06-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 to 19, 20, 20(8) and 20(9); Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules; Evidence Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 6, 21(1), 154(1), 156, 157, 157(1), 159, 164, 164(2), 167, 167(1), 167(2), 167(3), 260(1), 262, 268(4), 366 to 371, 392, 401, 437, 438, 438(7), 439 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 143, 336, 338, 343, 353, 365, 427, 448 and 506; Civil (H.C.) Rules, 1991; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Advocate for Respondent : M.A. Laskar, Addl. Adv. General, C.R. De and B.B. Narzary, Public Prosecutors

S.N. Phukan, J.1. By this common judgment and order I propose to dispose of two petitions filed under Section 401/482, Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution. The said petitions have been registered as Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 11 2003

Fairly Syiem Vs. the Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-11-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : U.K. Jaintia Hills Autonomous District (Appointment and Succession of Chiefs and Headmen) Act, 1959

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Narzary and N.D. Chullai, Advs.

B. Lamare, J.1. Heard Mr. T. T. Diengdoh, learned counsel for the petitioner assisted by Mr. E.C. Suja, learned counsel and also heard Mr. B.B. Narzary, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 5 and Mr. N.D....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1994

South Kamrup (Meghalaya) Timber Merchant Association, Mirza and anr. V ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-07-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Meghalaya Forest (Removal of Timber) (Regulation) Act, 1981 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 301; Meghalaya Forest (Removal of Timber) (Regulation) Rules, 1982 - Rule 3

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Narzary and A. Sharma, Sr. Advs. and P.C. Goswami, Adv.

J.N. Sarma, J. 1. Civil Rule No. 455 of 1987 has been filed by South Kamrup (Meghalaya) Timber Merchant Association, Mirza. It is a registered body under the Societies Registration Act, having its registered office at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1990

Shew Chander Mathu and anr. Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-29-1990

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 16(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rules 14 and 16

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Narzary, Public Prosecutor

J.M. Srivastava, J.1. The petitioners were prosecuted on charge under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, hereafter 'Act', on the allegations that on 28-6-80, the Food Inspector, hereafter referred as the 'Inspector', had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 1989

Md. Abdul Matlib Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-21-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Assam Liquor Prohibition Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Opium Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1974 - Sections 293, 293(4), 294 and 360; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1898 - Sections 510

Advocate for Respondent : B.B. Narzary, Govt. Adv.

J.M. Srivastava, J. 1. This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 6-1-83 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Now-gong.2. Briefly, the facts are that the petitioner was prosecuted for having committed offence under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1989

Kajal Dey and ors. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-22-1989

Subject : Criminal

S.K. Homchaudhury, J.1. By this petition the petitioners who have been kept in the jail custody since 14-1-89 during the pendency of investigation have approached this Court for enlargement on bail after their applications for bail...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2005

Chandan Das and anr. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-11-2005

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 14, 14A, 19 and 19(2); Prevention of Food Adulteration (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 12 and 12A

Advocate for Respondent : F.H. Laskar, Adv.

P.G. Agarwal, J.1. All the above three revisions have been heard together and disposed of by this common judgment as the question of law raised in these revisions are identical.2. Heard Mr. J M Choudhury, Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1995

U. Swindro Lyngdoh Vs. U. Dwik Syiemiong and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-28-1995

Subject : Civil

Acts : Khasi Hills (Establishment, Management and Control of Markets) Regulation, 1979 - Sections 2, 6(3) and 8; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : M.Z. Ahmad and S.S. Nongrum, Advs.

Khanna, C. J. 1. This Writ Appeal has been filed against the judgment of the learned single Judge dated 14-3-95, in Civil Rule No. 16(SH) 94. 2. At the admission stage we have heard Mr. N....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial