Advanced Search Results

Swarnjee Singh Vs. Asharam Gamne

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 22, Rule 10; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1)

Reported in : 2001(1)MPHT396

Advocate for Respondent : Shri H.B. Agrawal, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. In this civil revision preferred under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') the defendant-petitioner has called in question the legal validity of the order...

Ranu Wd/O Sudhir Ghosh Vs. Rai Bahadur Bhootnath Dey and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12, 12(1), 13(1), 13(6) and 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 33

Reported in : 1999(1)MPLJ388

Advocate for Respondent : H.B. Agrawal, Adv. for non-applicant No. 1

ORDERR.S. Garg, J.Shri Alok Aradhe, learned counsel for the applicant.Shri H.B. Agrawal, Learned counsel for the non-applicant No. 1.1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is finally heard.2. In a suit filed under Section...

Smt. Snehlata Sharma and ors. Vs. Mohammad Ali and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT471

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Jain, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and ;H.B. Agrawal, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jabalpur, in Claim Case No. 53/89, dated 7-4-1992.2. On 26-1-1989, at about 12.50 a.m., deceased was going on his scooter...

Snehlata Sharma and ors. Vs. Mohammad Ali and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2002ACJ1129

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Jain and ;H.B. Agrawal, Advs.

Bhawani Singh, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jabalpur, in Claim Case No. 53 of 1989, dated 7.4.92.2. On 26.1.1989, at about 12.50 a.m., deceased was going on...

Prem Singh Chouhan Vs. L.M. Pandey

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10 and 22; Madhya Pradesh Lokayukt Evam Up-Lokayukt Adhiniyam, 1981 - Sections 17; Madhya Pradesh Lokayukt Evam Up-Lokayukt (Investigation) Rules, 1982 - Rule 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Prevention of Corruption Act

Reported in : 2003(1)MPHT38(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : H.B. Agrawal, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard.2. This revision has been preferred against the order dated 9-11-2001 passed by the IInd Additional District Judge, Durg whereby a direction has been issued by the Court to the Lokayukt, Raipur to enquire into...

Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board Vs. Ram Mohan Shrivastava and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1998ACJ651

Advocate for Respondent : V.P. Verma and; H.B. Agrawal, Advs.

S.K. Dubey and Shambhoo Singh, JJ.1. Misc. Appeal No. 262 of 1988 is by the owner, Misc. Appeal No. 293 of 1988 is by the insurance company, filed under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act,...

Prakash Shivajirao Deshmukh and ors. Vs. Shivajirao Ramchandrarao Desh ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : 2004(2)MhLj939

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Agrawal, Adv. For respondent Nos. 2 to 4

N.V. Dabholkar, J.1. Heard Advocate Shri R.M. Borde for petitioners and Advocate Shri S.B. Agrawal for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Respondent No. 1 is absent, although served.2. The revision petition challenges judgment and order dated...

Malu Shripati Gadekar and ors. Vs. Raosaheb S/O Sadashiv Gadekar Throu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 38E; Hyderabad Tenancy Rules - Rule 21

Reported in : 2005(1)MhLj999

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Choudhari and ;D.N. Suryawanshi, Advs. for respondent Nos. 2 and 3, ;Sangita Dhumal, Adv. for respondent No. 4, ;S.B. Agrawal, Adv. for respondent No. 6, ;N.P. Patil, Adv. for respondent Nos. 7 t

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Agricultural land in Survey No. 24 (Gat No. 33) and Survey No. 25 (Gat No. 34), admeasuring about 34 Acres and 29 Gunthas and 16 Acres 28 Gunthas, respectively, of village Vasangaon, was...

Asmi Jewellery India Ltd. and Another Vs. Godrej Consumer Products Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

P.C. For reasons to be recorded separately, both the summons for judgments are rejected. Un-conditional leave to the defendant granted. Defendant to file their written statement within 4 weeks. Within 2 weeks thereafter parties to file...

Smt. Sudha Tripathi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR1999MP188

Advocate for Respondent : Anurag Choudhary, Panel Lawyer;Kamlesh Tripathi, Adv., ;Party in person, ;V.K. Shukla, ;Nitin Pendharkar and ;Abhay Sapre, Advs.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for quashment of Annexure P-10 agreement entered into by Madhya Pradesh Financial Corporation (hereinafter...