Advanced Search Results
Raymond Limited Vs. Steel Tubes of India Limited
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-11-2003
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15 and 22
III(2003)BC257
Vivek Saran, Adv.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The decision rendered in this company petition shall also govern the disposal of other connected company petitions being Company Petition Nos. 13 of 2000, 21 of 2000, 14 and 30 of 2001 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManohar Lal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-14-2001
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 132(6), 132B, 132B(4), 244A and 244A(1); Consitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
(2001)168CTR(MP)558; [2001]249ITR1(MP)
Arun Patnakar, Adv.
A.M. Sapre, J.1. The petitioner by filing this writ under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, claims the following relief :'A writ, direction or order in the nature of mandamus be issued to the respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSavitridevi Wd/O Kailashchandra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-18-1996
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1) and 6; Constitution of India - Article 226
1996(0)MPLJ592
Vinaya Zelawat, Govt. Adv. for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and ;B.A. Chitale, Adv. for Respondent No. 3
ORDERC.K. Prasad, J.1. The petitioner seeks quashing of notification dated 3-3-1991 (Ann. P/4) issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and notification dated 26-6-1992 issued under Section 6...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S.N. Kedare Vs. Ceat Tyres of India Ltd., Mumbai and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-12-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 9A
[2001(91)FLR922]; 2002(2)MhLj359
S.S. Parakh, Adv., i/b., Aditya Chitale, Adv.
D.Y. Chandrachud, J. 1. The petition is directed against an award of the Industrial Tribunal rendered on 18th October, 1996 in a reference to adjudication under Section 10 of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnchor Industries Employees' Union Vs. Anchor Industries and 33 Ors.
Mumbai
Nov-01-2002
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25FFF, 25G and 25O; Constitution of India - Article 227; Bombay Shops and Establishment Act
(2003)3BOMLR698
J.P. Cama, Sr. Adv., i/b., Aditya Chitale, Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;Haresh pai, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and ;C.U. Singh, Adv., i/b., ;Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 9
1. By this Petition filed by the Employees Union, the Union is challenging an order dated 30th December, 1995 passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra, Mumbai, whereby the Industrial Court has dismissed the complaint (ULP No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinder Kumar Panchal and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-21-1999
Civil
Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 346; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2000MP28; 1999(2)MPLJ660
B.A. Chitale, Govt. Adv., ;V.K. Dubey and ;S.S. Samvatsar, Advs.
Khan, J. 1. PETITIONERS claim to be members of Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Indore and social workers also. They claim that 'Nav Durga Mata Temple' situate at Manish Bagh Colony looked after by one Ishwarlal, was illegally...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHiralal Jitmal Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-24-1957
Sales Tax
Madhya Bharat Sales Tax Act, 1950 - Sections 2 and 3(1)
AIR1957MP37; [1957]8STC325(MP)
K.A. Chitale, Adv.
Dixit, J.1. This is a reference under Section 13 (1) of the Madhya Bharat Sales Tax Act, 1950, by the Sales Tax Commissioner. The assessee is a printer and dyer of textile cloth purchased by Mm...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKothari and Sons and Others Vs. N. Subramanian, Income-tax Officer, Ce ...
Chennai
Mar-06-1990
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245D(1), 245D(1A), 245D(4), 245E, 245F, 245F(1), 245F(2), 245F(4), 245H, 245H(1), 245-I, 245M, 276C, 277 and 278; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 193, 196 and 420
[1992]196ITR82(Mad)
Ramasamy K., Adv.
Arunachalam, J. 1. A common question arises for decision in all these petitions and hence they are isposed of together. The question is whether an assessee who had filed an application before the Settlement Commission under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›