Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Rajkumar Kochhar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR797

Vimadalal, J.1. This case has had a long and chequered career in the course of which it has paid brief visits to the Supreme Court thrice. The facts of the prosecution case as well as the...

Western Coalfields Ltd. Through the Chief General Manager Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 4(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 64, 64(4), 68 and 69; Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(1), 9, 9(1), 10, 10 (1), 10(2), 11, 11(1) and 11(2); Land Acquisition Act; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5(1), 7(2), 13 and 18; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Rules; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 12 (1), 12(3), 21 to 24 , 31, 33 and 34; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 123, 124 and 127A(2); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act. 1956 - Sections 136; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR414; 2009(111)BomLR502

Advocate for Respondent : Bharati Dangre, Additional Government Pleader, ;T.R. Kankale, Asst. Govt. Pleaders, ;D.B. Patel and ;R.N. Kothari, Advs.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Common question involved in all these Writ Petitions is, .whether State Government can levy and demand any sum as amount of nonagricultural assessment from Petitioners WCL.... Petitioner- Company is incorporated under the Companies...

Arts and Commerce College, Pen, District Raigad Vs. State of Maharasht ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR309; 1994CriLJ172

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Gokhale, Asst. Govt. Pleader, ;S. Radhakrishnan, ;R.A. Rodrigues and ;K.P. Jain, Advs.

V.A. Mohta, J.1. Arts and Science College, Pen, District Raigad, has filed this petition under S. 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 2. In a Writ petition no. 3123 of 1991 filed by the...

Kanbi Vaghji Savji Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60 and 157; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162

Reported in : AIR1968Guj11; 1968CriLJ54

Advocate for Respondent : B.R. Shah, Asst. Govt. Pleader, In Cr. App No. 82/64,; A.D. Shah, Adv.

1. Karamshi Vasara had for sons Arjan, Nathu, Laxman and Jeran, who were living separate from each other. However Karamshi Vasaram with his wife was living with his son Nathu. Since last 4 or 5 years...

Surja Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 397; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 406

Reported in : AIR1951Raj68

Advocate for Respondent : Sumer Dan, Asst. Govt. Adv.

ORDERGupta, J.1. This is a reference made by the Ses J., Ganganagar who has recommended that the order of the Sub-divisional Mag, Ganganagar, contained in his judgment dated the 25-2-1950, by which he has ordered that...

Ramlal Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 112, 117, 117(1) and 117(3)

Reported in : AIR1951Raj116

Advocate for Respondent : Sumerdan, Asst. Govt. Adv.

ORDERGupta, J.1. On 4-3-1950, the city police of Bikaner filed a complaint before the City Mag, First Class, Bikaner, that Ram Lal had distributed certain pamphlets directed against the Hon'ble Shri Raghuwar Dayal Goyal, Pood Minister,...

Motilal Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342

Reported in : AIR1951Raj119

Advocate for Respondent : Sumerdan, Asst. Govt. Adv.

ORDERGupta, J.1. This is a reference by the Dist Mag, Jodhpur, recommending that the judgment of the City Mag, Jodhpur, dated 22-8-1949, convicting one Vazira under the Influx from Pakistan Control Ordinance, 1948, & sentencing him...

State of Gujarat Vs. Jagdishbhai Kevarbhai

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Law Officers Rules - Rules 132 and 133

Reported in : (2001)GLR342

Advocate for Respondent : Mukesh R. Shah, Adv.

M.R. Calla, J.1. These eight First Appeals against the order dated 30-3-1998 passed by the Assistant Judge at Himatnagar in LAQ Cases No. 3396/89 to 3403/89 were filed before this Court on 5-4-1999. Subsequently the Civil...

Yerikala Sunkalamma & Anr. versus State of Andhra Pradesh, Departm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1011

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Prerna Singh

[2025] 3 S.C.R. 1011 : 2025 INSC 383Yerikala Sunkalamma & Anr. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Revenue & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 4311 of 2025) 24 March 2025 [J.B. Pardiwala* and R. Mahadevan, JJ.]Issue...

Subodh S. Shah and ors. Vs. Director, Food and Drugs, Food and Drugs C ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3, 5, 6(2), 8, 8(2), 12, 16, 16(1), 17, 17A, 17B, 18, 18(C), 21, 27, 33 and 33(2), ; Constitution of India - Article 226; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rules 2, 62, 69, 76, 122F to 122P and 124; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment Rules), 1993

Reported in : AIR1997Guj83; (1997)1GLR362

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. Shah, AGP

ORDERS.D. Shah, J.1. Is human blood a 'drug'? AND Are Pathologists tapping blood from human beings manufacturing 'drug' so as to incur liability to obtain licence under Section 18(c) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940?are the...