Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: aspi chinoy · Page 1 of about 120 results (0.108 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 27 2006

The Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai a Statutory Corporation Cons ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-27-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 110, 123, 125, 126, 128, 130, 132, 133, 134, 137, 138, 139 to 144A, 146, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 156 to 166, 166(2), 167, 167(2) and 217; Bombay Rent Control Act - Sections 2(10) and 7; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1); West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Sections 2(10); Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 123(1); Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988; Calcutta Municipalities Act, 1951 - Sections 168; Rent Restriction Act; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction Control) Act; Calcutta Munici

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR338; 2006(3)BomCR557

Advocate for Respondent : Aspi Chinoy and ;D.J. Khambatta, Sr. Advs., ;M.S. Mustafa and ;A.S. Doctor, Advs., i/b., Junnarkar & Associates for the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and ;Amjad Sayed, Additional Government Pleader for the

R.M. Lodha, J.1. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its functionaries have preferred this appeal aggrieved by the judgment and order dated October 14, 2004, passed by the learned Single Judge. The learned single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2004

Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Cabot International Capital ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-03-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities and Exchange Board in India Act, 1992 - Sections 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E, 15F, 15G, 15H, 15HA, 15HB, 15I and 15J; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulation 3, 3(1) and 3(4)

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR700; [2005]123CompCas841(Bom); (2004)2CompLJ363(Bom); [2004]51SCL307(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Aspi Chinoy and ;Suneep Sen, Advs.

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. Enlarged and projected issue is, whether mens rea is sine qua non, for imposing penalty for breach of the provisions of the SEBI Act and the Regulations framed thereunder, apart from the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1996

Suresh K. Mehta Vs. S.B. Chincholikar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-13-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(3), 6(4), 13A2, 15A and 31E(4); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 2, Rules 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 105 and 111

Reported in : 1997(3)BomCR315

Advocate for Respondent : Aspi Chinoy and ;Janak Dwarkadas, Advs., i/b., Desai and Diwanji for respondent No. 2

R.M. Lodha, J.1. In this Civil Revision Application filed under section 31-F of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (for short, 'Rent Control Act'), the petitioner impugns two orders passed on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 30 2005

Kesha Appliances P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Royal Holdings Services Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 81(1), 81(1A), 111A, 111A(2) and 111A(3); Securities Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11, 11(4), 11B, 11H, 12, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E, 15F, 15H, 15HA, 15HB, 15I, 15Z, 15Y, 20A, 21, 24 and 32; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969; Evidence Act, 1872; Inams Act - Sections 2A, 3(4), 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9, 10AS, 12, 13 and 14; Estate Abolition Act; Limitation Act; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 331, 332, 334, 343, 344, 345A, 347(3), 347B, 347D and 347E; Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 7; Interstate Water Disputes Act, 1956; Securities Exchange Board of India Rules; Securities Exchange Board of India Regulations; Companies (Passing of the Resolutions by Postal Ballot) Rules, 2001;

Reported in : 2006(1)BomCR545; [2006]130CompCas227(Bom); [2005]65SCL293(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Aspi Chinoy and ;Shrikant Doijode, Advs., i/b., Doijode Associates for Defendant No. 1, ;K.G. Munshi, Adv., i/b., Kanga and Co. for Defendant No. 2, ;Janak Dwarkadas, Adv. a/w. P.K. Samdani and ;Anuj

S.U. Kamdar, J.1. These two Notices of Motion are taken out for various interim reliefs in a suit which has been preferred by the shareholders of a company known as Spice Jet Ltd The defendant No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1992

Jamshed N. Guzdar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-29-1992

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay City Civil Court and Bombay Court of Small Causes (Enhancement of Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 1; Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution of India - Articles 2, 3, 4, 14, 19(1), 138, 214, 226, 230, 246, 247 and 254; Bombay High Court Letters Patent (Amendment) Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Act, 1977 - Sections 19; North America Act - Sections 101; Advocates Act, 1961; Calcutta City Civil Court (Amendment) Act, 1969; Andhra State Act, 1953 - Sections 28; States Reorganisation Act, 1956; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

Reported in : AIR1992Bom435; 1992(3)BomCR494; (1992)94BOMLR984

Advocate for Respondent : Aspi Chinoy, Adv. i/b.;Mulla and Mulla,;and C.B. and;E. for Bombay Bar Association in support,;Anil B. Divan, Sr. Advocate,;Miss Rajni Iyer i/b.;Kanga and Co., for;Indian Merchant Chamber in support.;

ORDER1. The Petitioner, who is the Chairman of Airfreight Limited and claims to be the Director of 14 other Public Companies espousing the cause of litigants in Greater Bombay, by way of public interest litigation has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1992

Darshan Anilkumar Patel Vs. Gitaneel Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-16-1992

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections Sections 162, 433, 450, 450(1) and (3), 582, 583, 643 and 643(1) and (2)

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR440; (1993)95BOMLR462; [1994]81CompCas805(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Aspi Chinoy, ;J.B. Chinai, ;Pravin Samdani and ;F.E. Devitre, Advs.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. This is an application for appointment of a provisional liquidator of the first respondent pending the hearing and final disposal of the petition for winding up of the first respondent-company. Some of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2008

Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Previous Known as Lokhandwala Bu ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 95A and 103B; Specific Relief Act; Mulla Indian Contract Act; Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 33(7) and 33(9)

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR743

Advocate for Respondent : A.Y. Sakhare and ;A.K. Savla, Advs. for B.M.C., ;C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. and ;Soma Singh, Adv., i/b., S. Udeshi & Co. for respondent No. 6, ;Aspi Chinoy, Sr. Adv. and ;R.M. Pethe, Advs. for Responden

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. Where some of the buildings constructed prior to 1940 on a large municipal plot are occupied by the tenants, whether the Municipal Corporation would be justified in permitting the developer appointed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2003

State Bank of India Vs. Alstom Power Boilers Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-21-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 87(2), 165 to 197, 235 to 251, 291(2) and 391 to 394; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2003(5)BomCR421; [2003]116CompCas1(Bom); [2003]43SCL449(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Aspi Chinoy and ;Rohit Kapadia, Advs.

D.G. Karnik, J.1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 31st October, 2002 passed by the learned Single Judge in the Company Petition No. 337 of 2002 and the Company Petition No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2006

Janhit Manch and Bhagvanji Raiyani Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-20-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(19), 2(9A), 9, 22, 31, 31(5), 37, 37(1), 37(IB), 38, 44, 45, 46, 54, 55, 56, 64, 113A, 126, 126(1), 135, 136, 152 and 158; Negotiable Instruments Act; Sea Customs Act - Sections 78A and 178A; Limitation Act; Slum Clearance Act, 1971; Bombay Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act - Sections 13; BMC Act - Sections 144B and 354(AAA); Environmental Protection Act; Water Pollution Act; Air Act; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 91 and 141 - Order 2, Rule 2; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 6; Draft Development Rules, 1989; Development Control Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1), 21, 31(2), 32, 178A and 226; Development Control Regulations for Greater Bomba

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR110; 2007(1)BomCR329

Advocate for Respondent : Ravi M. Kadam, Adv. General and ;Niranjan Pandit, Asst. Govt. Pleader for Respondent No. 1, ;K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Counsel, ;P.A. Purandhare and ;V. Mahadik for Respondent No. 2, ;Virendra V. Tulzapurka

F.I. Rebello, J.1. The creative judicial interpretation of Article 21 by our constitutional Courts, has broadened our vision, in understanding the expression 'right to life'. Preventing degradation of our ecology and protection of our environment, including...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2021

Amazon.com Nv Investment Holdings Llc Vs. Future Retail Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-06-2021

Subject : Arbitration

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4492-4493 OF2021AMAZON.COM NV INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC … APPELLANT VERSUS FUTURE RETAIL LIMITED & ORS. … RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4494-4495 OF2021CIVIL APPEAL...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial