Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ashutosh srivastava · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.060 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 07 2002

Saurabh Gupta Vs. Chairman, Counselling Board, C.P.M.T., 2000-01 and a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-07-2002

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC890

Advocate for Respondent : Ashutosh Srivastava, Adv.

V.M. Sahai, J. 1. The petitioner appeared in C.P.M.T. Examination, 2001 under physically handicapped category. In the result the petitioner's over-all rank was 2126 and his rank in physically handicapped category was 18. He was required...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2000

Naveen Jamval and Others Vs. Arvind Kumar Kankane and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-11-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 28(5)

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC880; (2000)2UPLBEC1537

Advocate for Respondent : Ashutosh Srivastava, Adv.

G. P. Mathur, J.1. All the threespecial appeals arise out of Writ Petition No. 41814 of 1999 filed by Dr. Arvind Kumar Kankane, and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order.2. The controversy...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1998

Jagdamba and Others Vs. Sub-divisional Officer, Sadar, Mirzapur and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-10-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3(4), 4(2), 132, 195, 197, 198, 198(4), (5) and (6) and 333; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rules 5, 176, 176A and 176A(2)

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC1505

Advocate for Respondent : Ashutosh Srivastava, Adv. and ;S.C.

D. K. Seth, J.1. By an order dated 26.10.1991 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate in exercise of power conferred under Rule 176 (2) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952, the lease...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 11 2002

Anurag Verma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-11-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 28(5); Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 32; Post Graduate Medical Education Rules, 2000 - Rule 9

Reported in : AIR2002All370

Advocate for Respondent : Ashutosh Srivastava, S.C.

ORDERAshok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri Dinesh Dwivedi, senior Advocate assisted by Sri S.D. Kautilya for the petitioner, Sri Ashutosh Srivastava for respondent No. 2 and learned standing counsel,2. Counsels for both the parties have prayed that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2005

Sonu Pal Son of Awadh Pal Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-09-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3, 4, 323, 376, 498A and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 5

Reported in : II(2005)DMC745

Advocate for Respondent : Ashutosh Srivastava, Adv. and ;A.G.A.

Ravindra Singh, J.1. Heard Sri Vinod Sinha learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and Sri Ashutosh Srivastava learned counsel for the complainant.2. From the perusal of the recored it reveals that in the present case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1999

Km. Priyanka Agrawal Vs. Director General, Medical Education and Train ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-02-1999

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15(4), 16(4), 29 and 340; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Physically Handicapped, Dependents of Freedom Fighters and Ex-servicemen) Act, 1993 - Sections 2 and 3;

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC473; (2000)1UPLBEC503

Advocate for Respondent : Hanuman Upadhyay, Addl. ;Chief S.C. and ;Ashutosh Srivastava, Adv.

Yatindra Singh, J.1. Does a candidate in order to qualify as a dependent of a freedom fighter, should be financially dependent upon him? What is the interpretation of the word 'dependent' In the Uttar Pradesh Public...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2005

Devendra Kumar Arora Son of Mohan Lal and Smt. Sheela Devi Wife Mohan ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-16-2005

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2437

Advocate for Respondent : Kapil Kumar Pandey, ;Ashutosh Srivastava, ;V.K. Srivastava, ;V. Singh, Advs. and ;S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri S.S. Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 2 and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 3,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1995

Ashutosh Srivastava and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-27-1995

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 71, 205, 313 and 317

Reported in : II(1996)DMC670

I.S. Mathur, J.1. This petition under Section 482, Cr. P.C. is directed against the order dated 31.1.1995 requiring personal appearance of the petitioners in the Court in Criminal Case No. 545 of 1994 under Section 406,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2011

Chandrama Singh and ors. Vs. Mirza Anis Ahmad

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-25-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 145;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 100; Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 - Section 2; Indian Registration Act, 1908; Registration Act - Section 17 (1) (b), 49

Advocate for Respondent : R.K.Jain; J.N.Srivastava; J.N.Verma; M.D.Singh Shekhar; S.C.Srivastava, Advs

1. This is a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 29.09.1988 passed in Civil Appeal No. 152 of 1986 (Mirza Anis Ahmad vs. Chandrama Singh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2009

Wasan Shoes Ltd. and ors. Vs. Chairperson, Debts Recovery Appellate Tr ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-29-2009

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009All163; 2009(4)AWC3881

ORDERTarun Agarwala, J.1. Heard Shri Ravi Kant, the learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Shri Kushal Kant, the learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri Siddharth, the learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4, and Shri Shashi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial