Advanced Search Results
Chinta Haran Biswas Vs. Uco Bank and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-31-1995
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 12
(1995)2CALLT167(HC),[1995(71)FLR933],(1996)IIILLJ820Cal
Subrata Roy and ;Gopal Chandra Sen, Advs.
Satya Brata Sinha, J.1. This writ application is directed against an order of transfer dated April 12, 1994 as contained in annexure 'B' to the writ application whereby and where-under the petitioner has been transferred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Consultancy and Services Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...
Kolkata
Jul-11-2002
Property
Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3)(A) and 17(4); ;West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control Act, 1947 - Section 10B; ;West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control (Temporary Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1986; ;West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control (Temporary Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1896
(2003)2CALLT302(HC)
Ashutosh Shaw and ;Tapash Kr. Chatterjee, Advs.
P.K. Chattopadhyay, J.1. Petitioners filed the instant writ petition challenging the acquisition proceedings whereby the respondents had sought to acquire an area approximately 1000 sq. ft. in the North Western portion of the ground floor of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: National Sugar Mills Ltd. (In Liquidation)
Kolkata
May-23-1975
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 543
[1978]48CompCas339(Cal)
Bikash Sen, Adv. for respondent No. 3
Ajay K. Basu, J.1. This is an application by the official liquidator under Section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956, against various directors who have been made respondents in this application. Of course some of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sushila Jaiswal Vs. C.E.S.C. Ltd. and Others
Kolkata
Oct-03-1994
Electricity
Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24, 24(1), 26 and 26(6);; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1995Cal186
Suchit Kr. Banerjee, Adv.
ORDER1. This writ application is directed for cancellation of an electric bill raised by the C.E.S.C. Ltd., for the month of March, 1990 and for necessary direction to submit correct bill after testing meter.2. The petitioner's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKumarapuram Gopal Krishnan Ananthakrishnan Vs. Burdwan-cutwa Railway C ...
Kolkata
Apr-04-1978
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 149(2A) and 433; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137
[1978]48CompCas611(Cal),82CWN774
S.C. Sen, ;P.K. Sen, ;B. Gupta and ;Ashutosh Law, Advs.
Salil Kumar Dutta, J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment and order of Ramendra Mohan Datta J., dated March 21, 1975 (see page 211 supra) whereby the application of the Registrar of Companies for winding...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Dhanuka Vs. Collector of Customs
Kolkata
May-11-1993
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15(1), 17, 18, 25(1), 47, 47(2), 59, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 68, 72, 72(1) and 72(2); ;Customs (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Section 50; ;Central Excises Act, 1944 - Section 37(B)
1993(66)ELT361(Cal)
Ashutosh Law and ;Samir Sengupta, Advs.
Ruma Pal, J.1. The subject matter of controversy in this writ application is the liability of the petitioner to pay interest on goods warehoused by the petitioner under Section 59 of the Customs Act, 1962.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradeep Ch. Saha Vs. Additional Collector of Customs
Kolkata
Jul-09-1993
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111, 112, 125, 125(1), 129A(1), 129B(2), 129B(4), 129D, 129D(2) and 129D(4); ;Customs Rules
1995(51)ECC110,1993(68)ELT525(Cal)
Ashutosh Law, Adv.
1. Two several consignments of Clove were imported by the appellants. The first consignment arrived on 12th May, 1993 and the second consignment on 19th May, 1993. So far as the first consignment is concerned the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSumanlal Parekh and ors. Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Customs, ...
Kolkata
Jan-24-1973
Customs
Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 2 and 8(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1974Cal158
ORDERT.K. Basu, J. 1. In this application the petitioners Sumanlal Parekh and Ram Chandra Varma challenge a notice dated 24th April 1971. The opening paragraph of the notice is in the following terms:--'Whereas, on the evidence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›