Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ashokan · Page 1 of about 1,744 results (0.203 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 25 1999

Veekesy Rubber Industries Vs. Sales Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-25-1999

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 10(3) and 19

Reported in : [2000]118STC372(Ker)

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Ashokan, Special Government Pleader for Taxes

S. Sankarasubban, J. 1. Petitioner--Veekesy Rubber Industries--is an assessee under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the KGST Act'). The original petition has been filed to quash exhibit P4 notice issued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 2007

Dhirajlal Chhotalal Parekh and anr. Vs. Appropriate Authority and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-05-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UC, 269UD and 269UD(1)

Reported in : [2008]298ITR27(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Ashokan, Adv.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners are challenging the order dated February 24,1993, passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 269UD(1) of the Income-tax, Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1997

State of Karnataka by Nazarabad Police, Mysore Vs. N. Somashekar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-14-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 28, 174, 378 and 386; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 300, 302, 304, 341 and 506

Reported in : ILR1998KAR53; 1998(1)KarLJ551

Advocate for Respondent : Sriyuths C.G. Sundar, ;N. Samba Murthy and ;B. Anand, Advs.

Acts/Rules/Orders:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 28, 174, 378 and 386;Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 201, 300, 302, 304, 341 and 506Cases Referred:State of Uttar Pradesh v. Krishna Gopal and Another, AIR 1988 SC 2154,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 23 2007

Lis (Registered), Palakkal Court Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-23-2007

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Kerala Tax on Paper Lotteries Act, 2005 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6, 6(2), 7, 7(1), 8, 10, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2; Revenue Recovery Act; Karnataka Tax on Lotteries Act, 2004; Sale of Goods Act

Reported in : AIR2007Ker178; (2008)17VST432(Ker)

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Ashokan, Spl. G.P. (Taxes)

K.S. Radhakrishnan, Actg. C.J.1. Petitioner was served with a notice dated 15-5-2006 from the office of the Assistant Commissioner (Assmt.) Special Circle-I (KGST) Ernakulam directing it to furnish complete details of lottery tickets purchased and sold...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2007

Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. Vs. State of Keral ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-29-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 9; ;Central Sales Tax Act, 1956

Reported in : (2008)15VST384(Ker)

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Ashokan, Special Government Pleader (Taxes)

ORDERH.L. Dattu, C.J.1. H. L. Dattu C.J.-M/s. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. is the revision petitioner in this sales tax revision petition. It is a co-operative society dealing in milk and milk products. The petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2007

Mrs. Amarjit Thapar and ors. Vs. S.K. Laul, Chief Engineer and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-04-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269U(1), 269UD and 269UD(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2007)212CTR(Bom)185; [2008]298ITR336(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Ashokan and ;Vishal Kanade, Advs., i/b., Mahimtura and Co.

V.C. Daga, J.1. This petition is directed against the order dt. 15th Jan., 1993 (Exh. G) passed by the Appropriate Authority, Bombay under Section 269UD(1) of the IT Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) for compulsorily purchase...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2007

Vishwa Bandhu Pearyelal Gupta and Santosh Vishwa Bandhu Gupta Vs. S.K. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-11-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD(1)

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Bom)385; [2008]302ITR157(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Ashokan, Adv.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. In this petition, the challenge is to the order dated 25th February, 1993 passed by the Appropriate Authority under Section 269UD(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short) whereby 'Abhishek...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2007

Govardhandas Odhavji Dhakan and anr. Vs. Appropriate Authority

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-24-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD(1)

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Bom)114; [2008]304ITR168(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Ashokan, Adv.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. Whether the Appropriate Authority was justified in passing the impugned order on 25th Feb., 1993 under Section 269UD(1) of the IT Act (the Act' for short) for purchase of Flat No. 11 (3rd...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 2007

Kishor Tulsidas Choksi and ors. (Also Known as Kishorchandra Tulsidas ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-05-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD, 269UD(1) and 269UL(3)

Reported in : (2008)215CTR(Bom)414; [2008]298ITR228(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Ashokan, Adv.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners are challenging the order dated February 18, 1993, passed by the appropriate authority under Section 269UD(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2007

Shrikrishan Jindal and ors. Vs. S.K. Laul and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-03-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD(1)

Reported in : [2008]305ITR353(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Ashokan, Adv.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. This petition is filed to challenge the order dated February 25, 1993, passed by the appropriate authority under Section 269UD(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short).2. The facts relevant for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial