Advanced Search Results

Jeet Ram Kishore and ors. Vs. Sunder Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 12(1), 23A and 151 - Order 6, Rules 5, 10(4), 15, 17 and 18; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Section 111; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 7 and 16; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 16(2) - Order 6, Rule 17; ;Bengal Finance Sale Tax Act; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 111; ;Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act - Sections 6(1), 6(7), 13 and 13A; ;Income Tax Act; ;Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987; ;Press Council Act 1978; ;Parliament Act

Reported in : AIR2005HP21

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Sood, Adv.

ORDERArun Kumar Goel, J. 1. This revision is directed against the order dated 1-8-2003, whereby learned trial Court has dismissed the application under Order VI, Rule 17 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. filed by the...

Pradeep Kumar Abrol Vs. Rakesh Seth

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; ;Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 - Section 9; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166 and 166(3); ;Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 420; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 204 and 227

Reported in : 2006(2)ShimLC285

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Sood, Adv.

Deepak Gupta, J. 1. This appeal by the complainant is directed against the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sundernagar in case No. 6-I/2003/2-III/2003 dated 24.9.2005, whereby he has discharged the accused.2. The facts in...

Brij Lal and ors. Vs. Rai Sahib Puran Mall Trust Dharamshala, Shimla a ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : The H.P. Urban Rent Control Act 1987 - Section 14; The Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act 1947 - Sections 13, 13(c), 13(2)(iii); Constitution of India - Article 136

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Sood, Adv.

1. This revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 28.08.2010, passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Shimla in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 42-S/14 of 2009. 2. Material facts necessary for adjudication of this petition are...

Thakur Dass Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5, 6, 8 and 32(1); ;High Court Rules - Rules 3, 5 and 7; ;High Court Orders; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161 and 313; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2415

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Chauhan, Asstt. Adv. General

V.P. Bhatnagar, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated Sept. 14, 1990 of the learned Sessions Judge, Shimla, whereby he convicted accused Thakur Dass for an offence Under Section 302, IPC for having...

Leela Sood and ors. Vs. Manohar Lal

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 2008(2)ShimLC498

Rajiv Sharma, J.1. This revision petition under Section 24(5) of the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 21.2.2008 passed by the Appellate Authority in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal...

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gurbax Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : III(2006)ACC411,2007ACJ21

Deepak Gupta, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of two appeals being F.A.O. Nos. 240 and 241 of 2001 as they arise out of a common award and the same accident.2. The facts necessary for the decision...

Hans Raj and Others Vs. Ran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Raman Sethi

RAJIV SHARMA, J. 1. This regular second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Solan on 23.3.2002 in Civil Appeal No.51-S/13 of 2001. 2. Material facts necessary for...

State of H.P. and ors. Vs. Pankaj Sharma and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 5, Rule 1 - Order 8, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2006HP14

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Sood, Adv.

ORDERV.M. Jain, J.1. This revision petition has been filed by the defendants against the order dated 25-2-2005 passed by the learned trial Court vide which the defence of defendants 5 (a), 5(b), 5 (e) and 6...

Yudhister Lal Thukral Vs. Smt. Sumitra Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138

Reported in : [2002]112CompCas493(HP),[2003]44SCL509(HP)

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Sood, Adv. for respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 and; Naresh Thakur, Adv. for respondent No. 4

Arun kumar Goel, J.1. It is proposed to dispose of all these five criminal revisions by a common judgment, because except for cheques as well as memos issued by the bankers, all other questions of law...

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vidya Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1998ACJ162

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Gautam,; Pramod Thakur and; Ashok Sood, Advs.

A.L. Vaidya, J.1. The present claimant-respondent Nos. 1 to 7 preferred a petition under Sections 110-A and 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 for the grant of compensation against the present appellant, insurance company and...