Advanced Search Results

B.D.A. Limited Vs. Shaw Wallace Company Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1) and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 17, 21 and 61

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR672

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Sen and ;V.A Bobde, S.Cs., ;Arvind Bobde, ;M.G. Ramchandran and ;A.V. Mohta, Advs.

B.U. Wahane, J.1. Blood is thick than water is exclaimed universally. No distance breaks the tie of blood; brothers are brothers evermore. Brothers foregoing world of pleasure for younger of same blood seems to have bared...

Management of the Advance Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gurudasmal, Supdt. of ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 2(2), 3, 4(1), 5(1) and 6, 72, 94(3), 100, 100(1), (2) and (4), 175(3) and 311(1); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 2(3), 5, 5(3) and 46(3); Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Act, 1952; Constitution of India - Articles 77(2), 166, 166(1), (2) and (3), 227, 239, 239(1), 245, 246(4), 278, 358, 372, 372-A(1), 372-A and 385; Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956; Adaptation of Laws Order, 1956; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58) and (60), 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 54, 58, 156, 160, 161, 165, 166(1) and (3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 56, 57, 62 and 63; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 405, 409 and 477-A; Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 104 and 105; Bombay Police Ac

Reported in : AIR1969Delhi330; ILR1969Delhi426

Advocate for Respondent : C.K. Daphtary, ; R.L. Mehta and ; Brij Bans Kishore, Ad

V.S. Deshpande, J.1. On the complaint dated 30-1-1968 by Shri S. Vanchinath, Income-tax Officer, Section X (Central), Bombay, against the petitioner company alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 120B read with 409 and 409 and...

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sampat Lal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173(8) and 482

Reported in : AIR1985SC195; 1985CriLJ516; 1985(1)Crimes86(SC); 1984(2)SCALE942; (1985)1SCC317; [1985]2SCR256

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Sen, ; Shankar Das Banerjee, Sr. Advs., ; D.N. Das,

Ranganath Misra, J.1. The appeal is under Article 134 with leave from the Calcutta High Court and is directed against the judgment of a Division Bench of that Court dated September 27, 1983. The Special Leave...

Union of India and ors. Vs. Lachmi Narain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 6(2); Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) (Amendment) Act, 1959; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21

Reported in : ILR1972Delhi475; [1973]32STC113(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Sen, Shri. Ashok Sen

Hardayal Hardy, C.J.(1) This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment dated the 13th January, 1971, passed by Shri v. S. Deshpande, a single Judge of this Court in Civil Writ No. 574-D of 1966,...

State of Tamil Nadu and Others Etc. Vs. L. Krishnan and Others Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Slum Improvement (Acquisition of Land) Act, 1954; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 9, 48A and 55; Madras City Improvement Trust Act, 1950; Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act - Sections 2, 12 to 69A and 70; T.N. Land Acquisition Rules - Rule 3; Tamil Nadu Housing Board Amendment, 1992

Reported in : AIR1996SC497; 1996(4)KarLJ331; [1995]Supp4SCR663

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Ashok Sen

ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. Civil Appeal Nos. 1865-66, 1868-70 of 1992.2. These appeals are preferred by the State of Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu Housing Board and others against the judgment of the Madras High Court allowing...

Rajender Prashad and ors. Vs. Devi Dayal Ravinder Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21 Rule 66, Order 21 Rule 90, Order 21 Rule 89

Reported in : 1993Supp(1)SCC444

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashoke Sen

B.C. Ray and; T.K. Thommen, JJ.1. Leave granted. Arguments heard.2. The instant appeal on special leave has been filed against the judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court whereby the High Court upheld...

State of T.N. and ors. Vs. L. Krishnan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 23(1A) and 48A; Tamil Nadu State Housing Board Act

Reported in : 1996AIHC497; JT1995(8)SC1; 1995(6)SCALE221; (1996)1SCC250

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Ashok Sen

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.Civil Appeal Nos. 1865 - 66/1868 - 70 of 19921. These appeals are preferred by the State of Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu Housing Board and others against the judgment of the Madras High...

Gobind Pritamdas Malkani Vs. Amarendra Nath Sircar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 314; ;Constitution of India - Article 311; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 39; Special Relief Act, 1963

Reported in : [1980]50CompCas219(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Sankar Das Banerjee, ;Ashoke Sen, ;Samiram Sen, ;Sankar Ghosh, ;Sudipla Sircar and ;R.C. Nag, Advs.

Padma Khastgir, J.1. A company formerly known as N. C. R. Corporation and since April, 1974, known as M/s. National Cash Registers Co. with limited liability incorporated in the U.S.A., having its registered office at U.S.A.,...

M/S. Priyanka Overseas Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Ot ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 15, 46, 58, 59, 68, 71, 112 and 124; West Bengal Jute Goods Future Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 2(1); Indian Sale of Goods Act - Sections 2(2)

Reported in : AIR1991SC583; (1990)3CompLJ3(SC); 1991(32)ECC189; 1991(51)ELT185(SC); JT1990(4)SC490; 1990(2)SCALE1028; 1991Supp(1)SCC102; [1990]Supp3SCR138

ORDERN.M. Kasliwal, J.1. Special leave granted.2. Two important questions are involved in the case out of which one is relating to Import Policy and the other is regarding the duty payable under the Customs Act, 1962.3....

N.K. Bapna Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationCustoms

Acts : Constitution of India; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Customs Act - Sections 2(23), 2(39), 2(43), 49, 59, 72, 111 and 125(2)

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas745(SC); 1992(60)ELT13(SC); JT1992(4)SC49; 1992(1)SCALE1135; (1992)3SCC512; [1992]3SCR267; 1992(2)LC417(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Subba Rao

S. Ranganathan, J. 1. The petitioner is the Managing Director of M/s. E.A.P. Industries Ltd., engaged in the business of manufacture and production of plastic compounds, plastic films and sheets and plastic chemicals. The petitioner says...