Advanced Search Results
Smt. Tara Sundari Ghosh Vs. Smt. Chhayarani Dandapath
Kolkata
Oct-03-1994
TenancyCivil
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 13 and 17(3);; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order1, Rule 9 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
AIR1995Cal123
Sakti Nath Mookherjee, ;Bhaskar Ghose and ;Saptangsu Basu, Advs.
ORDER1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 13th June, 1986 passed in Title Appeal No. 679 of 1985 by the Additional District Judge, 6th Court, Alipore whereby the learned Additional District Judge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSk. Salam Vs. Sant Singh and Another
Kolkata
Dec-01-1989
Family
Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 24, 25(III), 27(1), 34 and 34(2);; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 366
AIR1990Cal315,I(1991)DMC371
Asoke Kumar Sengupta and ;Binayak Kumar Ghoshal, Advs.
ORDERHaridas Das, J.1. This civil revisional application by the respondent/petitioner Sk. Salam is directed against an order dt. Mar. 27, 1989 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Tenth Court, Alipore rejecting the petitioner's application under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSailendra Kumar Neogi Vs. Santosh Kumar Neogi and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-13-1991
Property
Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 3, 4 and 4(1); ;Evidence Act - Section 35
(1992)2CALLT89(HC)
Ashok Kumar Sengupta, ;Binayak Kumar Ghosal and ;Anilendu Mukherjee, Advs.
Lilamoy Ghosh, J.1. In a suit for partition against the defendant, the plaintiffs, who are the successors-in-interest of Late Sidhheswar Neogi, urged that both the 'A' and 'B' Schedule properties belonged to Sidhheswar. The plaintiffs 1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Trambaklal Dayalal Kothari Vs. L.K. Dey and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-30-1981
Civil
Court-fees Act, 1870 - Section 19H(3)
AIR1982Cal217
Ashok Kumar Sengupta and ;Tapan Kumar Sengupta, Advs.
ORDERManashnath Roy, J. 1. In this Rule, which was obtained with a corresponding interim order On 21st June, 1974, the petitioner, Trambaklal Dayalal Kothari, has impeached certain orders made by the Probate Deputy Collector, being Respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHemanta Kumar Dey Vs. Taramani Devi Tibriwalla
Kolkata
Feb-09-1971
Limitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 100; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5
AIR1973Cal144,76CWN710
Ashoke Kumar Sengupta, Adv.
ORDERSantosh Kumar Chakravarti, J.1. An application under Order 21, Rule 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure had been filed by the opposite party No 1 on the 2nd August, 1968 and the allegations are that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRathindra Nath Bose Vs. Jyoti Bikash Ghosh and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-07-1975
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 94, 104, 105, 115, 141 and 151 - Order 9, Rule 9 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1
AIR1975Cal377,79CWN873
Shyama Charan Mitter, ;Ashok Kumar Sengupta, ;Shyama Prasanna Roy Chowdhury, ;Pradip Kumar Guha, Advs. (for Nos. 1 and 2), ;Joyanta Mitra, Adv. (for No. 4), ;R.C. Deb and ;Samar Kr. Dutta, Advs. (for
ORDERSalil Kumar Datta, J. 1. This Rule has been obtained against the order passed on appeal by the Additional District Judge, 1st Court, Alipore, dissolving the injunction granted by the trial court. The facts in short...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Smt. Dalia Ghosh; in Re: Subramanian Rajamani
Kolkata
Jul-03-1991
Civil
West Bengal Court Fees Act, 1970 - Section 7
(1991)2CALLT304(HC),96CWN77
Ashok Kumar Sengupta, ;Tarun Kumar Banerjee and ;Binayak Kumar Ghoshal, Advs.
Samir Kumar Mookherjee, J.1. We directed both these revisional applications to be heard together as the point involved in the same, namely, when the question of pecuniary jurisdiction is raised by filing an objection Under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›