Advanced Search Results

Nirmal Verma Vs. Mcd and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : CCS (Conduct) Rules - Rule 5 and 5(2); CCS (Pension) Rules - Rule 26(4) and 26(5)

Reported in : 118(2005)DLT665; 2006(1)SLJ243(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Bhasin, Adv.

ORDERReference to your application dated 01.04.2002, requesting for withdrawal of resignation from the post of H.M.In this regard, it is inform you that your request of withdrawal of resignation has been turned down by competent authority....

Puneet Industrial Controls (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Aditya Enterprises Pv ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1999IIAD(Delhi)820; 78(1999)DLT811

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Bhasin and ; Mr. P.L. Sebastain, Advs.

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed the this application for injunction. The point involved in the case lies in a very narrow compass. The plaintiffs filed the Suit No.2852-94 against M/s. Classic Electronics and Mr....

B.W.L. Ltd. vs. M.T.N.L.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)165; 85(2000)DLT84; 2000(53)DRJ437

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Bhasin Sr. Advocate, ; Mr.B.K. Aggarwal and ;

ORDERVikarmajit Sen, J.1. By this judgment I propose to decide three petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitration Application No. 45/1998 is directed against the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.; and...

Asha Rani Gupta Vs. Rajender Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Mr. Anubhav Bhasin, Mr. Arav Kapoor

* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A.No. 18877/12 in CS(OS) No. 288/12 Date of Decision:8. h May, 2013 + # ! ASHA RANI GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr....

Mohd. Farooq Vs. Aneesa Begum and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 115 - Order 7 Rule 11; Land Acquisition Act - Section 6

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjiv Sindhwani; Mr. Ashok Bhasin; Mr. Tarique Siddique, Advs.

1. The revision petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure ('CPC' in short) against the order dated 15-12-2010 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge whereby the application of the...

Oruj Ahmed Vs. RashiduddIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anwar Ali Khan, Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Mr. Zubair Khan, Mr. Tamim Qadri, Mr. Arav Kapoor, Mr. Anubhav Bhasin

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No. 17544/2011 in CS(OS) No. 2310/2011 Date of Decision:10. h July, 2013 + # ! ORUJ AHMED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Y.D. Nagar, Advocate...

Ryan International School Employees Welfare Associ Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Mr. Atul Kumar, Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Mr. Jaideep Bedi, Mr. Sunklan Porwal, Mr. Anubhav

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 6470/2010 % 12th August, 2013 RYAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION &ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Dhingra, Adv. versus UOI & ORS....

Ryan International School Employees Welfare Associ Vs. Director of Edu ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Atul Kumar, Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Mr. Jaideep Bedi, Mr. Sunklan Porwal, Mr. Anubhav, Ms. Anjana Gosain

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 3128/2011 12th August, 2013 RYAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Dhingra, Adv. versus DIRECTOR OF...

Allahabad Bank Vs. Krishan Chander Ramesh Chander and Bors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 21, 151; Suit Valuation Act - Section 11

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Ashok Bhasin; Mr.Sunklan; Ms.Shuchisnita Ojha, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest? 1. By this appeal the appellant-bank seeks to...

S. Rajdeo Singh and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Requisitioning and Acquisition of Imoveable Property Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3, 6(2) and 17; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 4 and 9(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 300A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 6, Rule 17; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105

Reported in : AIR1991Delhi1; ILR1990Delhi220

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Bhasin, ; Harish Patni, ; M.S. Dutta, ;

ORDERP. N. Nag, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ of ,mandamus directing the respondents to deliver the possession of Flat No. G-2, Connaught Circus, New Delhi, presently in occupation of...