Advanced Search Results
Chhabi Lal and ors. Vs. Rajveer Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-24-2009
CivilProperty
2009(3)AWC2521
Sri. Arvind Srivastava
Sanjay Misra, J.1. Heard Sri Arvind Srivastava learned Counsel for the defendant-appellant and Sri H.M. Srivastava alongwith Sri Neeraj Srivastava learned Counsel who has put in appearance by caveat on behalf of the plaintiff respondent No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnand Kumar Rai Son of Late Sri Chandra Deep Rai Vs. Vice Chancellor, ...
Allahabad
May-01-2006
Constitution
2006(4)AWC3501
R.K. Jain, ;Pankaj Naqvi, ;V.K. Upadhyaya and ;Rahul Jain, Advs.
Arun Tandon, J.1. Banara Hindu University has been declared to be an Institute of national importance and accordingly included in Entry 63, List 1, (Union List) of Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India commonly known...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradutt Kumar Bharti Son of Shri Parshu Ram, Vs. Allahabad University ...
Allahabad
Apr-10-2007
Constitution
2007(4)AWC3673
Sri. P.S. Baghel
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri P.S. Baghel, learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.2. Petitioners, namely, Pradutt Kumar Bharti, Ambika Prasad Chaudhary and Prem Sagar, were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Aligarh Muslim University Through Its Vice-chancellor Vs. Malay Sh ...
Allahabad
Jan-05-2006
Constitution
Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1981 - Sections 2(1), 5(2), 8, 16, 17, 18, 20A, 21, 22, 23, 26, 26A, 27, 28, 29, 31, 34 and 35; Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920 - Sections 2, 3, 5(9A), 6, 8, 12(2) 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(5), 14, 15, 19, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 28(1), 28(2), 30, 30(2), 32, 32(1), 36, 36(2), 40 and 40(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28); Constitution of India - Articles 26, 28(2), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 32, 226, 245 and 246; Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1961 - Sections 11(1); Kerala University Act, 1969 - Sections 48 and 49; Gujarat University Act, 1949 - Sections 33A
2006(1)AWC992
Gopal Subramaniam,; Ravi Kant,; J.J. Munir,; Arvind Srivastava, ; Ravindra Srivastava, ; S.G. Hasnain, Advs. and S.S.C.
Ajoy Nath Ray, C.J.1. The short basic issue in all these appeals is whether the Aligarh Muslim University is a minority Institution. The point arises because suddenly some eighty five years after incorporation, they chose for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Aeronautics Limited Vs. Kanhaiya Lal Verma (Since Deceased) ...
Allahabad
Sep-04-2009
CivilProperty
2010(1)AWC89
Sri. Arvind Srivastava
Rakesh Sharma, J.1. Heard Sri S.D. Singh, learned Counsel for the appellant, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Chakeri, Kanpur (hereinafter referred to as the H.A.L.) and Sri Arvind Srivastava who is representing the respondent-applicants.2. The present first appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDilip Oil Co. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jun-13-2005
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Kerosene Oil Order, 1962; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Distributor Order, 2004 - Sections 28(1); Public Distribution System Control Order
2005(4)AWC3381
Arvind Srivastava, S.C. and ;Navin Sinha, Adv.
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri R.N. Singh senior advocate assisted by Sri A. K. Singh advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Navin Sinha senior advocate assisted by Sri Arvind Srivastava advocate on behalf of respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmIn Khan Son of Akbar Khan, Member, Three Members Committee Vs. State ...
Allahabad
Mar-05-2008
Civil
2008(2)AWC2002
Sri. Arvind Srivastava
B.S. Chauhan and Arun Tandon, JJ.1. The application for leave to appeal has been filed challenging the Judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 09-01-08 passed in Writ Petition No. 60988 of 2007 Smt....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarika Kedia Vs. Addl. District Judge and ors.
Allahabad
Oct-09-2009
Tenancy
2010(1)AWC26
Poonam Srivastav, J.1. Heard Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Tulika Prakash advocate for the contesting respondents.2. Two writ petitions are being decided by a common judgment since basic questions involved are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVikas Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Sep-14-2009
ServiceRight to information
2010(1)AWC104
Amitava Lala, J.1. Since both the aforesaid writ petitions are connected and have been heard analogously, the same are being decided by this common judgment and order having binding effect upon both the writ petitions.2. Both...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPanchami Singh Vs. Junior Director of Education and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-19-2002
Service
Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Regulation 3; Uttar Pradesh Recognised Basic Schools (Recruitment and Condition of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978
2003(3)AWC2227
V.K. Shukla, ;V.B. Khare, ;A.K. Shukla, Advs. and ;S.C.
Janardan Sahai, J.1. The issue in this writ petition is the determination of inter se seniority between the petitioner Panchami Singh and the third respondent Indrajeet Gaur. They are both teachers in the L.T. grade in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »