Advanced Search Results

V. Muneesan Vs. Indian Overseas Bank Rep. by Its Executive Director Ce ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ296Mad; (2003)3MLJ319

Advocate for Respondent : K. Srinivasamoorthy, Adv. for ;Row & Reddy

ORDERD. Murugesan, J. 1. The petitioner was proceeded with disciplinary proceedings while he was working in the East Mada Street Branch of the respondent bank during the year 1991-92. By charge sheet dated 12.12.91, the following...

V.K. Pathak. Vs. Food Corporation of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Education

1. Heard Sri Vikas Budhwar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Satya Prakash appearing for the Food Corporation of India. 2. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged between the parties and with the...

B.P. Sinha Vs. the Chairman and Appellate Authority, Steel Authority o ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Conduct Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1977

Reported in : [2004(3)JCR629(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : G.M. Mishra, Adv.

ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. The petitioner who was holding the post of Deputy Chief Material Manager in Grade E-5 in the Purchase Department of Bokaro Steel Plant was charge-sheeted and was proceeded depart-mentally for the following charges...

MamdIn Khan Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : ServiceCivil

Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj1464; 2005(3)WLC123

Advocate for Respondent : O.P. Sharma, Adv.

V.K. Bali, J.1. Challenge in the present D.B. Civil Special Appeal is to the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 12.2.2004 vide which CWP No. 1188/98 filed by the appellant was dismissed.2. Briefly put,...

L.Ashok Kumar Vs. the Commissioner of Municipal Administration and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Municipalities

Acts : Tamilnadu Municipal Service (Discipline and Appeals) Rules 1970 - Rule 8(2)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.R.Lakshmi Narayanan, Adv.

1. The prayer in the writ petition is for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the proceedings of the first respondent dated 3.10.2008, by the said proceedings, the first respondent directed the second respondent...

Ram Avtar and ors. Vs. the State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 149, 224, 225, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD(Cri)97; 2003CriLJ480; JT2002(9)SC615; (2002)10SCC52; 2003(1)LC18(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Arvind K. Shukla, ; Rasheed Saeed and ; Pramod Swarup, A

Sema, J. 1. These appeals have been preferred by eight appellants, who had been convicted by the learned VIII Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh which had been confirmed by the High Court. The High Court, while confirming...

Mr. Mir ZamIn Ali Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2001)(77)ECC24

1. The applicant before his retirement was served with a show cause notice on 6,7.90. Immediately after the charge sheet he was suspended from service. But he was allowed to retire on attaining the age of...

K.V. Ravindran and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2004)(3)SLJ252CAT

1. Since common question of law and facts are involved in the two original applications before us, they were heard together with the consent of the parties Counsel, for convenient disposal by a common judgment.2. Shri...

Subir Kumar Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ172CAT

1. The applicant in this O. A. is presently working as Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-Ill), Kochi. He has challenged the following Office Memoranda: (a) Annexure A-4 Memorandum dated 21.5.02 issued by order and in the...

Shyamal Kumar Das Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ServiceCivil

Advocate for Respondent : R. Dasgupta, Adv.

Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. Heard Mr. A.K. Bhowmik, learned senior counsel being assisted by Mr. A.K. Deb, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. Dasgupta, learned counsel for the respondents.2. Though there appears to be a...