Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: arun mohan · Page 1 of about 174 results (0.155 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 11 2006

Wipro Limited Vs. Beckman Coulter International S.A.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-11-2006

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27 and 28; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 41 and 42

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR118(Delhi); 2006(2)CTLJ57(Del); 131(2006)DLT681

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Mohan, Sr Adv. and ; Arvind Bhat, Adv.

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J. 1. In this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), the petitioner is seeking directions and/or orders restraining the respondent from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2001

Raj Kishan Dass Vs. Mrs. Kusum Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-2001

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 5, 6 and 43

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT359; 2001(60)DRJ803

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. Nandarajog, Adv.

ORDERJ.D. Kapoor, J 1. The short controversy to be settled at this stage is the determination of issue No.2 which has been framed as a preliminary issue and is as under :-'Whether a trust as alleged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1995

intercraft Ltd. Vs. Capital Boot House

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-24-1995

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 3

Reported in : 1995IIIAD(Delhi)798; 59(1995)DLT774; 1995(35)DRJ368

S.D. Pandit, J.(1) This application is filed by the defendant under Rule 4 of Order 39, Civil Procedure Code.(2) Suit No.2199/94 is filed by the plaintiff Intercraft Ltd. to get a decree of perpetual injunction to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 23 1995

Mahli Devi Vs. Chander Bhan and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 54; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2 and 110; Government of India Act - Sections 107 and 108; Land Acquisition Act, 1921 - Sections 26; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39; Trade Marks Act - Sections 76

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)1434; AIR1995Delhi293; 58(1995)DLT162; 1995(33)DRJ121

Advocate for Respondent : P.L. Kalra, Adv.

ORDERArun Kumar, J. 1. The question for consideration by the Full Bench is whether aLetters Patent appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent applicable to this court is maintainable in view of the provisions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 1997

Om Prakash Vs. Dev Raj Kohli

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-26-1997

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(10)

Reported in : 67(1997)DLT721; 1997(42)DRJ573; 1997RLR539

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arun Mohan

Usha Mehra, J. (1) Petitioner has felt aggrieved because of having not been granted leave to defend the petition of eviction filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 1980

Shashi Kapur Vs. Sulakshna Malhan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-23-1980

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 18(1980)DLT62

Harish Chandra, J.(1) This is a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order dated 22nd February, 1980 of Shri K.S. Gupta, Additional Distt. Judge, Delhi, dismissing an appeal against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1976

The Oriental Bank of Commerce Ltd. Vs. Raj Kumar and Company and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-02-1976

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 147

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi228

M.S. Joshi, J.(1) Gian Chand Jain purchased property built on plot No. 95, Block No. 5-C, Western Extension Area, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, at a public auction held in execution of a decree for Rs. 57,000.00...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2003

Aggarwal and Modi Enterprises (Cinema Project) Private Limited and anr ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-08-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : New Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 140, 141 and 141(2); Constitution of India - Article 14; Rent Act, 1995; Mulla's Transfer of Property Act; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 4

Reported in : 2003VIAD(Delhi)1; 106(2003)DLT113

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Mohan, Senior Adv. and ;Hima Kohli Adv.

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This writ petition seeks the setting aside of the order dated 13th November, 2001, passed by respondent New Delhi Municipal Council (hereinafter referred to as `N. D. M. C. '), holding the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2001

Meera Gupta Vs. Dinesh Chand and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-08-2001

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT10; 2002(63)DRJ264

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arun Mohan, Sr. Adv., ; Ms. Kavita Kumar and ; Mr. A.K.

ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. Property seems to be the genus of family disputes. Late Subhash Chand passed away on 20.3.1991 leaving behind his second wife, Meera Gupta, the appellant herein and his adopted daughter Rashi ,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2003

Bank Kreiss Ag Vs. Ashok K. Chauhan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-06-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 101 and 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi42; III(2003)BC91; [2004]122CompCas906(Delhi); 105(2003)DLT135; 2003(68)DRJ492

Advocate for Respondent : Rajiv Nayar and ; Arun Mohan, Sr. Advs., ; Vinay Garg,

J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. This is an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure seeking amendment in respect of paras 6A and 17 of the plaint. Relevant facts lie in moderate compass.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial