Advanced Search Results

Union of India and anr. Vs. Charanjit S. Gill and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 34 to 68, 69, 71, 108, 109, 110, 112, 118, 130, 153, 154, 158, 160, 162, 164, 191 and 192; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 37, 39, 40, 44, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 60, 61, 62, 66(1), 69, 70, 71, 89, 102, 103, 105, 113 and 129; Army Rules, 1959; Indian Army Act, 1911; U.K. Act; Court Martial (Appeals) Act, 1951; Court Martial (appeals) Act, 1968; Uniform Code of Military Justice Act, 1950; Administration of justice Act, 1968; Military Justice Act, 1968; Constitution of India - Article 71(2), 233 and 235; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 107(2)

Reported in : AIR2000SC3425; JT2000(5)SC135; 2000(4)SCALE221; (2000)5SCC742; 2000(2)LC1317(SC); (2000)2UPLBEC1642

ORDERR.P. Sethi, J.1. Leave granted.2. Finding that the Judge Advocate was lower in rank to the accused facing trial before a General Court Martial (hereinafter referred to as 'GCM'), the Division Bench of the High Court...

Sanjay Paper and Chemical Industries Ltd. Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2006All106

Advocate for Respondent : S.P.K. Tripathi, ;Tej Pratap Tewari, Advs. and ;Vivek Kumar Birla, S.C.

ORDERVineet Saran, J.1. Original Suit No. 119 of 2002 was filed by Shakuns Moterik Company Ltd. against the petitioner M/s. Sanjay Paper and Chemical Industries Ltd. Along with the suit, an injunction application was also filed,...

State of U.P./District Judge Vs. Arun Kumar Yadava Son of Sri Ram Auta ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008CriLJ117

Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.1. This reference has come up before this Court for taking proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act on the basis of a letter dated 5.9.2005 of Shri Abdul Qayum, Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial...

Municipal Council Vs. Balwinder Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2000(86)FLR513]; JT1999(10)SC489; (2000)IILLJ532SC; (2001)9SCC394; (2000)3UPLBEC2715

G.B. Pattanaik and; Umesh C. Banerjee, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. The appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 27-4-1999. The High Court in the impugned judgment without even...

Kamla Devi Vs. Munni Devi Tripathi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3951

Poonam Srivastav, J. 1. In the instant writ petition, the order dated 29.5.2009, releasing the house in dispute passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 13, Kanpur Nagar in Rent Revision No. 38 of 2008,...

Geeta Devi and anr. Vs. Daulati Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 4

Reported in : RLW2003(3)SC404; 2003(4)SCALE2; (2003)12SCC123

Lakshmanan, J. 1. The short question that arises for consideration in these appeals is : Whether a party to the compromise decree can file a petition under Section 4 of the Partition Act, 1893 where parties...

Chandrika Prasad Shukla Vs. Director of Education and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16F(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC377; (2004)1UPLBEC434

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Mishra and ;A.K. Mishra, Advs. and ;S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer for quashing the order dated 19.2.1991 passed by the Director of Education and also for a direction to pay to the petitioner arrears of...

Kishan Lal Mahadeo Pershad and anr. Vs. I.K. Sharma and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 - Sections 19(4); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1974Delhi32; 9(1973)DLT303; 1973RLR315

Advocate for Respondent : Jai Bhagwan Goel, Adv.

ORDER1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner challenges the order of the Competent Authority under the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 by which respondent No. 2 herein...

Satish Kumar Goel Vs. State and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)841; 2000CriLJ2177; 84(2000)DLT199; 2000(52)DRJ823

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.C. Mittal, Standing Counsel, ; Mr. P.N. Lekhi, Senior Advocate and ;

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1. This is a writ petition whereby the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to register an FIR in terms of the report/complaint made by the petitioner and for direction to respondents...

Radhika Garg Vs. Delhi University and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Delhi University Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 4

Reported in : 119(2005)DLT225

Advocate for Respondent : Maninder Acharya, Adv.

Gita Mittal, J.1. These writ petitions raise questions relating to the manner of exercise of the discretion conferred on the respondents to permit migrations of students from one course and institutions under the Delhi University to...