Advanced Search Results

K.K. Jerath Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 438

Reported in : AIR1998SC1934; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)722; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)76; 1998(2)BLJR1477; 1998CriLJ2555; JT1998(2)SC658; RLW1998(2)SC246; 1998(2)SCALE471; (1998)4SCC80

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Jaitley and ; Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Advs., ; Indu Malhot

S. Rajendra Babu, J. 1. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code for grant of bail apprehending his arrest. The High Court which had granted an interim relief earlier on...

G.D. Sharma Vs. University Grants Commission and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 25(2)

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)917; 81(1999)DLT731; 1999(51)DRJ160

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arun Jaitley, Sr. Adv., ; Ms. Vimla Sinha and ; Ms. Ash

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J. 1. By this order I shall dispose of CM Nos. 7842/99 and 8025/99. 2. Let me state the facts in brief first. Petitioner is working as 'Senior fellow and Head' Higher Education Unit,...

Shubh Mangal Merchantile (P.) Ltd. Vs. Trion Restaurants (India) Pvt. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR2000Delhi13; 79(1999)DLT777; 1999(50)DRJ437

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Jaitley, Senior Adv., ; Amar Gupta and ; Jyoti Mehndir

M.S.A. Siddiqui, J.1. By this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks the following interim reliefs against the respondents :'(a) pass ad interim injunction against respondents from appointing and/or...

Madan Lamba and Smt. Sneh Lamba Vs. Jagdish Lamba and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 2003(1)ARBLR517(Delhi); 102(2002)DLT885; 2003(68)DRJ261

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Jaitley, Sr. Adv. and ; D.P. Sharma, Adv. for R-1 and R-2 in FAO(OS) Nos. 224, 227 and 238/2002, R

Usha Mehra, J.1. 'Interminable, time consuming, complex and expensive court procedures impelled jurists to search for an alternative forum, less formal, more effective and speedy for resolution of disputes avoiding procedural claptrap and this led then...

R.K. Mittal and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 45(1991)DLT589; (1992)IILLJ428Del

S.N. Sapra, J. (1) By this writ petition, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek to challenge the order dated September 20,1990, (annexure A), issued by Delhi Development Authority, respondent...

Ramesh Motiram Ramchandani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1995Supp(2)SCC139

K. Ramaswamy and; N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. This Court issued notice on 30-11-1992 on the representation that the case of the petitioner was identical to the case of V.K. Jain and he is entitled to relief granted...

Aaa Film Motion Picture Producers and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1999Delhi178; ILR1998Delhi763

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.C. Mittal, Adv.

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1. These two petitions raise common questions. thereforee, both the writ petitions are being disposed of together. The first petitioner, AAA Film Motion Picture Producers, is a sole proprietary firm of the second...

Modi Rubber Ltd. Vs. Guardian International Corp.

Court : Delhi

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16 and 18; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 82; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 6, 6.1, 9, 11, 17, 18, 19 to 24, 25 and 36; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 39 and 56; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 14, 14(1), 16, 21, 23, 41, 41(1) and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 20 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148A - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 39; LCIA Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 226

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR133(Delhi); 141(2007)DLT822

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Chandhiok and ; Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advs., ; Mann, ;

Gita Mittal, J.1. This petition raises two very interesting questions which are required to be answered. The first question raised is whether a party can seek interim relief on the ground that the other side has...

Navjyoti Coo-group Housing Society Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1993SC155; JT1992(5)SC621; 1992(2)SCALE548; (1992)4SCC477; [1992]Supp1SCR709a

Advocate for Respondent : Arjun Jaitly, ; Harish N. Salve, ; A.K. Gnaguli, ;

ORDERG.N. Ray, J.1. Legality and validity of the policy decision of Government of India dated January 20, 1990, containing the guidelines regarding the procedure for allotment of land by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to...

Housing Urban Development Authority and Another Vs. Kewal Krishan Goel ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1996IVAD(SC)548; JT1996(6)SC62; 1996(4)SCALE327; (1996)4SCC249; [1996]Supp2SCR587; 1996(2)LC287(SC); (1996)3UPLBEC1947

Advocate for Respondent : Pardeep Gupta and ; N.S. Bisht, ; Mahabir Singh, Advs.

ORDERG.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted.2. In these three appeals directed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court the common question of law is involved and as such are heard together and are being...