Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: aravind kumar · Page 1 of about 702 results (0.144 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 27 2008

The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. Rep. by Its General Manager and Co ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-27-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 11A, 21, 42, 47A, 49A, 49A(3), 49B, 49B(2), 50A, 50B, 56 and 56(1)

Reported in : 2009(3)KarLJ612; 2008(3)KCCRSN194; 2008(4)AIRKarR77; AIR2008NOC2416; 2008AIHC2768

Advocate for Respondent : Kesvy, Adv. and Co. in W.P. Nos. 27522/2004 and 46244/2004 for Respondent No. 1,; Aravind Kumar, ASG for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in Writ Petition No. 46244/2004,; Aravind Kumar, AGA in W.P. No. 2752

ORDERA.S. Bopanna, J.1. Common questions of fact and law arise in all these petitions. As such, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. In W.P. No. 46244/04, the first petitioner claims to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2007

B. Usha W/O Vishwanath S.V. and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka by Its Sec ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-13-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 7(1), 46, 67, 67-A, 68, 69, 80, 94 and 146(3); Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975; Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Rules; Provident Fund Act; Indian Penal Code; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008(2)KarLJ565; 2008(1)KCCRSN81; 2008(1)AIRKarR490; 2008LabIC(NOC)340(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : S.Z.A. Khureshi, AGA for R-1-4, ;Ashok Haranahalli, Adv. for R-5, ;Aravind Kumar, Adv. for R-6 to 14 & 16 to 24, ;B. Rudragowda, Adv. for R-15 in Writ Petition No. 42718 of 2004, ;S.Z.A. Khureshi,

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.Re: WP No. 42718 of 2004:1. Writ petition by as many as nine persons, some of whom were working as non-teaching staff at the Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Residential School, Ragigudda, Shimoga as well...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2007

Commissioner of Customs Vs. I2 Technologies Software Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-02-2007

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(44), 15, 15(1), 23, 23(2), 46, 47, 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 62, 64, 68, 71, 72, 72(1), 72(2), 111, 112, 114, 117 and 130(1); Customs Rules; Customs Regulations; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2008(128)ECC245; 2008(154)LC245(Karnataka); 2007(217)ELT176(Kar); 2008(3)AIRKarR166(DB)

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Ravishankar, Adv.

Arali Nagaraj, J.1. This appeal is filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore, under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') questioning the correctness of the order dated 23.8.2005 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 01 2004

T.S. Subbaraju Vs. T.A. Shivarama Setty and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-01-2004

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2004Kant479; 2004(7)KarLJ190

Advocate for Respondent : N. Ram Bhat, ;Arvind Kumar, ;M.R. Rajagopal, Advs.

Ram Mohan Reddy, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiff has preferred this appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, calling in question the legality and validity of the judgment and decree dated 8-11-2001 dismissing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2007

K. Sathya Murthy Vs. the Secretary Ministry for Industry and Commerce ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-29-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1949 - Sections 5; Patents Act, 1970; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005

Reported in : 2007(4)KarLJ686; 2007(4)KCCRSN260; 2007(3)AIRKarR40.

Advocate for Respondent : R. Muralidharan, ;Kumaran and ;Sagar, Advs., for R3, ;Aravind Kumar, ASQ for Rl, ;B. Papegowda, ACGSC, ;Ashok Haranahalli, CGSC, ;C. Shashikarantha, ACGSC for Rl, R2 and R4, ;G.V. Shantharaju, Sr. Cou

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. In response to the order and direction dated 3-11-2006 passed/issued by this Court calling upon the learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for respondent No. 1 - Government of India to respond to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 2009

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by the Chief Secretary ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-25-2009

Subject : Environment

Acts : Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 12, 18, 19, 21, 29, 33A, 34, 34(1) and 38; Arms Act, 1959; Environmental Protection Act, 1986; Wildlife (Protection) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 6(1); Constitution of India - Articles 48A and 51A

Advocate for Respondent : Aravind Kumar, Assistant Solicitor General, ;Udaya Holla, Adv. General, ;M.R. Naik, Sr. Adv., ;N. Ravindranath Kamath, Adv., ;Niloufer Akber, AGA, ;S.S. Haveri, Adv. (Amicus Curiae), ;P.M. Naik, Adv.

P.D. Dinakaran, C.J.1. The silent beauty and salient features of the nature and environment are described by our Great National Poet, Sri Rabindranath Tagore in 'GITANJALI', Poem 45, as hereunder:Have you not heard his silent steps?He...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2001

Ajit NaraIn Haksar and ors. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Central Exci ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-31-2001

Subject : ExciseCriminal

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9, 9(1), 9(2) and 9AA; Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 1985; Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190(1), 200, 319 and 482

Reported in : 2001(78)ECC326; 2000LC19(Karnataka); ILR2002KAR2175; 2002(4)KarLJ107

Advocate for Respondent : Aravind Kumar, Additional Bentral Government Standing Counsel

ORDERG. Patribasavan Goud, J.1. Alleging evasion of payment of duty under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 ('Act' for short) punishable under Sections 9(1) and 9-AA of the Act, respondent-Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2006

P. Gopal Raju, Prop. Global Engg. Works Vs. the Secretary, Government ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-21-2006

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 85(2); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 32

Reported in : ILR2006KAR3523

Advocate for Respondent : Aravind Kumar, Adv. for R.1 and 2

1. The appellant is before this Court calling in question the order dated 1.9.2003 passed by the VI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore city in Arbitration suit No. 5/2001. By the said judgment and order, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2004

Ajith Singh and ors. Vs. General Manager, Mysore Telecom District and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-06-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 7; Telegraph Rules, 1951 - Rules 2 (PP) and 443

Reported in : AIR2004Kant203; ILR2004KAR1043; 2004(4)KarLJ70

Advocate for Respondent : Aravind Kumar, ACGSC

ORDERH. Rangavittalachar, J.1. Writ petitioners are the sons of one Bindar Singh who was a subscriber to the telephone No. 497877. The said telephone was disconnected from service on 16-2-1999 for non-payment of telephone charges. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 2009

Sri Sathyamoorthy S/O. Perumal Vs. the Secretary to the Government of ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-11-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 10, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 13, 17, 17(2), 17(4), 17A, 18 and 23C; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1) and 617; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 4A, 5, 7A(1), 7D(2), 10, 12, 15(1), 21(2), 22, 24A, 26, 31(1), 35, 40(2), 58, 59, 59(1) and 63A; Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules; Civil Service Order, 1982; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2009(6)KarLJ327

Advocate for Respondent : Aravind Kumar, Assistant Solicitor General for R1-3 and ;Udaya Holla, Adv. General and ;Basavaraj Kareddy, Government Adv. for R4-R8

P.D. Dinakaran, C.J.1. This Public Interest Litigation is riled by Sri Sathyamoorthy, claiming to be a public spirited citizen, interested in safeguarding the public at large, against the exploitation of iron ore minerals in Karnataka.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial