Advanced Search Results

Silver Audio Systems Vs. Associated Electronic and Electrical Industri ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 451 and 452; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78, 79 and 85;

Reported in : ILR1986KAR217

Advocate for Respondent : S. Rangarajan, Senior Adv., ;K.G. Raghavan for R-1 and ;P.M. Appaji, HCGP for R-2.

ORDERKudoor, J.1. The order that gave rise to this Criminal Petition is the order dated 19-1-1984 passed by the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore City, in P.C.R. No. 115 of 1983 on an application I....

Ningappa Shivappa Gowri and ors. Vs. Kalavathi and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 495; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : ILR1986KAR211

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Appaji, Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. This Criminal Petition one under S. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure arose out of a private complaint filed by the 1st respondent Smt. Kalavathi against the petitioner (the accused) for offences punishable under...

M.Venugopal Vs. 1.The District Magistrate Cum

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:14. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.13733 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 of 2012 and 1 of 2013 M.Venugopal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Magistrate cum District Collector,...

Kishan Chand Sood Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 182

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi231

Jagjit Singh, J.(1) The short question involved in this case is as to whether the complaint filed against Kishan Chand Sood by Shri Devi Das Sharma, Station House Officer of the Roshanara Police Station, Delhi, purporting...

1.The Chief Educational Officer, Vs. 1.S.Christy

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Appeal (MD)No.463 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Kanyakumari District at...

Tarun Kumar Vs The Commissioner of customs

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.01.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.4044 of 2023 Tarun Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.2.Intelligence Officer, Chennai - 17. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed...

The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Tmt.Thangammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN C.M.A.(MD)No.778 of 2006 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2006 The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Trichy.Appellant Vs 1.Tmt.Thangammal 2.Karthigai Vani 3.Uma...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Bundi Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Bundi

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CompanyContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 14, Rule 4 - Order 41, Rule 1; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 14 and 55; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 93, 98 and 115; Constitution of India - Articles 13(3); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 84; Constract Act, 1872 - Sections 56 and 65

Reported in : AIR1970Raj36

Advocate for Respondent : M.B.L. Bhargava and; S.K. Zindal, Advs.

Lodha, J.1. This first appeal by the State of Rajasthan (which will hereinafter be called the State) arises out of a suit filed by it against the defendant Bundi Electric Supply Company Limited, Bundi (which will...

New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Vs. 1)p.Pandi

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN CMA(MD)No.601 of 2006 and CMP(MD)No.3436 of 2006 New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Through its Branch Manager, Dr.Thirumalai Plaza Complex, 82, Pudu...

Deo Sansthan Chinchwad and ors. Vs. Chintaman Dharnidhar Deo and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3 and 31(2)

Reported in : AIR1962Bom214; (1961)63BOMLR692; ILR1962Bom101

Advocate for Respondent : Y.S. Chitale, Adv. for ;H.R. Gokhale, Adv.

Gokhale, J.(1) This is an appeal by the original defendants against a decree passed in favour of the plaintiffs-respondents awarding Rs. 14,457, costs of the suit and interest at 3 per cent from date of suit...