Advanced Search Results

NavIn Chandra Vs. Basic Shiksha Adhikari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Junior High School (Payment of Salary to Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1978; Basic Education Act

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC510; (2005)2UPLBEC1227

Advocate for Respondent : Anupam Shukla and ;P.K. Sharma, Advs. and ;S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Anil Bhushan on behalf of the petitioner, Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents 1, 3 and 4, Sri Anupam Shukla and Pramod Kumar Sharma on behalf of respondent No. 2.2. The...

Devendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

(1) Cr.A.No.2253/2007 Cr.A.No.2330/2007 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: JABALPUR Division Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Saksena Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C.Sinho CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2253/2007 1. Devendra Singh, son of Jagannath Singh Yadav, aged 36 years, r/o Rajendra...

Rinku Baheti versus Sandesh Sharda

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1355; (2025) 3 SCC 686

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1355 : 2024 INSC 1014 Rinku Baheti v. Sandesh Sharda (Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 278 of 2023) 19 December 2024 [B.V. Nagarathna* and Pankaj Mithal, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether the...

Anupam Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Prabhakar Singh

Writ Appeal No.383/2013 (Anupam Shukla versus State of M.P.and otheRs.24.6.2013 Shri Navneet Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Kumaresh Pathak, learned Deputy Advocate General for the respondents No.1 to 3. Shri Prabhakar Singh, learned counsel...

Dr. Krishna Kant Trivedi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1907; [2002(94)FLR19]; (2002)2UPLBEC1945

Advocate for Respondent : Anupam Shukla, Adv. and ;Pushpendra Singh, S.C.

M. Katju and Rakesh Tiwari, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner, inter alia, has claimed that he should be considered for promotion for the post of Assistant Alcohol Technologist. This is precisely...

Rohitas Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : U. P. Palika Centralised Services Rules, 1966 - Rule 31; Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC641; [2001(89)FLR574]; (2001)3UPLBEC2064

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C.

Jagdish Bhalla, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order of termination of his services dated 24.3.1998, contained in Annexure-1 to the writ...