Advanced Search Results

Ram Murat S/O Shri Santoo Vs. Commissioner, Azamgarh Division,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 5; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 2(14) and 24; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1990 - Sections 3 and 4; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Distribution (Amendment) Order, 2004 - Sections 21, 27 and 28

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3419

Advocate for Respondent : Anju Kumar, ;V.K. Singh, ;Deepak Jaiswal and ;Gulab Chand, Advs. and ;S.C.

R.K. Rastogi, J.1. The petitioners in all these 32 writ petitions were licensees of the fair price shops. Their licences have been cancelled on the ground that either they themselves or their wives or other family...

Gulab Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1274

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Kumar Aditya, Adv. and ;Anuj Kumar, S.C.

Yatindra Singh, J. 1. A public auction for grant of fisheries rights for ten years was held on 10th September. 1990 in respect of a pond in old Khasra Nos. 1439. 1617 and 1624 (area about...

Mathai Lal Dube Vs. District Magistrate, Sant Ravidas Nagar and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 115A, B and C, 117, 122A, 122A(2) and C, 126 and 127; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1950 - Rules 115A, B and C Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 226; Panchayat Raj Act

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2752; (2000)3UPLBEC2604

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Sahi, ;G.K. Singh, ;Anuj Kumar, ;V.K. Tiwari, ;Gyan Prakash, ;R.K. Pandey, ;S.Cs., ;R.N. Singh and ;Vinay Malviya, Advs.

V.M. Sahai, J.1. The petitioner is a member of Gaon Sabha, Chauri Khas, Tehsil Bhadohi, district SantRavidas Nagar (in brief gaon sabha). He has filed this petition for quashing transfer of gaon sabha land, by the...

ishrat Jahan Vs. Vth A.D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 57 - Order 38, Rule 11 and 11A - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 2A - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1762

Advocate for Respondent : Anuj Kumar Srivastava, C.S.C.

A.N. Varma, J.1. One Humayum Mirza, predecessor of the petitioner, who was plaintiff before the trial court instituted a suit, being Regular Suit No. 205 of 1982, against the opposite parties for grant of an injunction.2....

Kashmir Singh S/O Deedar Singh Vs. Amarjeet Singh Alleged Son of Gurub ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 153(2), 172 and 186

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2838

Advocate for Respondent : M.C. Joshi, ;Anuj Kumar, Advs. and ;S.C.

S.N. Srivastava, J.1. Dispute arises out of proceedings under Section 186 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act.2. It transpires from the record that on the basis of some report the Lekhpal that the Bhumidhar is...

Ved Prakash Agrawal Vs. Nagar Palika

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1235

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Nigam, ;Riyaz Ahmad and ;Anuj Kumar Srivastava, Advs.

N.K. Mehrotra, J.1. This is second civil appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment and decree dated 30.8.1979 passed by the Vth Additional Distinct Judge, Hardoi in Civil Appeal...

Ram Asrey S/O Sri Adhya Prasad Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary Rev ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Revenue Act - Sections 33 and 39; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2084

Advocate for Respondent : Anuj Kumar, Addl. S.C. and ;S.C.

S.K. Singh, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned State Counsel and Sri Anuj Kumar, learned advocate who appeared for Land Management Committee.2. Prayer in this petition is to quash the proceedings in Case No....

Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Mr. Gajendra Singh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 17 and 55(1); Factories Act; Copyright Act, 1914 - Sections 5; Copyright Act, 1911; Workmen's Compensation Act; Evidence Act - Sections 40 to 42 and 43; Dramatic Copyright Act, 1833

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR532; 2007(6)BomCR700; (2007)109BOMLR2072; 2008BusLR161(Bom); LC2007(3)299; 2008(36)PTC53(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Veerendra Tulzapurkar, Sr. Adv., ;Amit Jamsandekar, ;Darius Dalal, ;Hemlata Marathe, ;Rashmi Thakur, Advs., i/b., Jehangir Gulabbhai and Bilmoria and Daruwalla for Defendant No. 1 and ;Ravi Kadam, Adv

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. Defendant No. 2 is one Ms.Karuna Raju Samtani and Defendant No. 3 is Star (India) Limited.2. The suit is filed for a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants from infringing the Plaintiff's copyright in...

Onkar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 11 and 184; Navy (Ceremonial Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provision) Regulations, 1963 - Regulations 268(1) and 269; Navy Service Pension and Gratuity Pension Regulations (Navy), 1964 - Regulations 78 and 79

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR247

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok H. Bathija, Adv., S.M. Shah and ;;S.M. Shah, ;R.C. Master and ;R.K. Sharma, Advs. in W.P. No. 2289 of 2000

A.P. Shah, J.1. These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution involve common question relating to the right to receive pension and since this question is common to all the writ petitions, they are being...

Union of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174

D.P. Mohapatra, J. 1. Leave granted.2. The question that arises for determination in these appeals is whether an Artificer Apprentice of Indian Navy who has been given a re-engagement for a certain period after obtaining his...